Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
If J** 6th was an i**********n, why have none of the more than 700 people arrested been charged with i**********n? Do you actually think i**********ns occur in some sort of vacuum with no i**********nists?
And the first trial the defendant was charged with s******n or do you think s******n and i**********n are words that don't carry the same meaning?
And shouldn't you be asking Chris Wallace by what logic did he thinks J** 6 was an i**********n? If you looked him up I am sure he would tell you the reason for his rhetoric.