Democrat Ketanji Brown Jackson Defends Her Record of Letting P*******es Off the Hook
Mar 22, 2022 18:50:56 #
If she protects p*******es, she will be approved by all democrats.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/ketanji-brown-jackson-defends-record-letting-p*******es-off-hook-video/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=the-gateway-pundit&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=daily
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/ketanji-brown-jackson-defends-record-letting-p*******es-off-hook-video/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=the-gateway-pundit&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=daily
Mar 22, 2022 19:28:39 #
Ri-chard wrote:
If she protects p*******es, she will be approved by all democrats.
The stupidity of this "let them off the hook" narrative is mind numbing...60 months versus 72 months is not letting someone off the hook, but when people run with the headlines and don't look at the case this is what we are left with.
She is far better as an unbiased judge that will adhere to the law without bringing religious "values" into her rulings than Barrett will ever be.
Mar 22, 2022 19:46:22 #
woodguru wrote:
The stupidity of this "let them off the hook" narrative is mind numbing...60 months versus 72 months is not letting someone off the hook, but when people run with the headlines and don't look at the case this is what we are left with.
She is far better as an unbiased judge that will adhere to the law without bringing religious "values" into her rulings than Barrett will ever be.
She is far better as an unbiased judge that will adhere to the law without bringing religious "values" into her rulings than Barrett will ever be.
That's a slap on the wrist for that kind of heinous crime. A former university professor Michael J. Pepe, 68, a p*******e, was sentenced to 210 years in prison by a Los Angeles judge for molesting underage girls in Cambodia.
Mar 22, 2022 21:42:57 #
woodguru wrote:
The stupidity of this "let them off the hook" narrative is mind numbing...60 months versus 72 months is not letting someone off the hook, but when people run with the headlines and don't look at the case this is what we are left with.
She is far better as an unbiased judge that will adhere to the law without bringing religious "values" into her rulings than Barrett will ever be.
She is far better as an unbiased judge that will adhere to the law without bringing religious "values" into her rulings than Barrett will ever be.
Your abject ignorance on this subject, and nearly all others, is what's truly "mind numbing".
Mar 23, 2022 09:02:18 #
River Reb
Loc: MS Delta
woodguru wrote:
The stupidity of this "let them off the hook" narrative is mind numbing...60 months versus 72 months is not letting someone off the hook, but when people run with the headlines and don't look at the case this is what we are left with.
She is far better as an unbiased judge that will adhere to the law without bringing religious "values" into her rulings than Barrett will ever be.
She is far better as an unbiased judge that will adhere to the law without bringing religious "values" into her rulings than Barrett will ever be.
Unbiased? I doubt it.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.