House Select Committee
Feb 1, 2022 20:57:59 #
Congressman Jamie Raskin said, “the committee is planning hearings that are similar to Trump’s second impeachment trial”.
Is Raskin saying that they are going to fabricate evidence like they did during Trump’s second impeachment trial?
Raskin was one of them that fabricated evidence.
Is Raskin saying that they are going to fabricate evidence like they did during Trump’s second impeachment trial?
Raskin was one of them that fabricated evidence.
Feb 1, 2022 21:42:56 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
[quote=One Patriot]Congressman Jamie Raskin said, “the committee is planning hearings that are similar to Trump’s second impeachment trial”.
Is Raskin saying that they are going to fabricate evidence like they did during Trump’s second impeachment trial?
Raskin was one of them that fabricated 1
Yeap, that's exactly what he's saying!😡
Is Raskin saying that they are going to fabricate evidence like they did during Trump’s second impeachment trial?
Raskin was one of them that fabricated 1
Yeap, that's exactly what he's saying!😡
Feb 1, 2022 23:32:43 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
One Patriot wrote:
Congressman Jamie Raskin said, “the committee is planning hearings that are similar to Trump’s second impeachment trial”.
Is Raskin saying that they are going to fabricate evidence like they did during Trump’s second impeachment trial?
Raskin was one of them that fabricated evidence.
Is Raskin saying that they are going to fabricate evidence like they did during Trump’s second impeachment trial?
Raskin was one of them that fabricated evidence.
Good. Why they’re wasting time with this they won’t be doing something even more destructive to the country. Besides, 3-0 will look good on Trumps résumé.
Feb 2, 2022 11:48:11 #
One Patriot wrote:
Congressman Jamie Raskin said, “the committee is planning hearings that are similar to Trump’s second impeachment trial”.
Is Raskin saying that they are going to fabricate evidence like they did during Trump’s second impeachment trial?
Raskin was one of them that fabricated evidence.
Is Raskin saying that they are going to fabricate evidence like they did during Trump’s second impeachment trial?
Raskin was one of them that fabricated evidence.
There was no evidence fabricated . It was abundantly available.
As the senate refused it into trumps trial, doesn’t Mean there wasn’t any,
Trumps trial consisted of no evidence, no testimony , no witnesses .
They called it a trial but on what planet are these things disallowed in a court of Law ?
Feb 2, 2022 16:37:17 #
Milosia2 wrote:
There was no evidence fabricated . It was abundantly available.
As the senate refused it into trumps trial, doesn’t Mean there wasn’t any,
Trumps trial consisted of no evidence, no testimony , no witnesses .
They called it a trial but on what planet are these things disallowed in a court of Law ?
As the senate refused it into trumps trial, doesn’t Mean there wasn’t any,
Trumps trial consisted of no evidence, no testimony , no witnesses .
They called it a trial but on what planet are these things disallowed in a court of Law ?
You are either ignorant to the facts or you are lying. Look it up!
Feb 2, 2022 18:32:32 #
One Patriot wrote:
You are either ignorant to the facts or you are lying. Look it up!
No . You look it up.
The republicans refused to allow the mueller report into trumps trial. So, no evidence,
Not guilty.
It’s how they roll . Are you blind ?
Deaf ? Or C***d c*********d ?
So , the 3rd world kangaroo court you're striving to avoid is already here.
And you keep defending them.
Blaming everyone that isn't you.
Feb 2, 2022 18:40:06 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
Milosia2 wrote:
No . You look it up.
The republicans refused to allow the mueller report into trumps trial. So, no evidence,
Not guilty.
It’s how they roll . Are you blind ?
Deaf ? Or C***d c*********d ?
So , the 3rd world kangaroo court you're striving to avoid is already here.
And you keep defending them.
Blaming everyone that isn't you.
The republicans refused to allow the mueller report into trumps trial. So, no evidence,
Not guilty.
It’s how they roll . Are you blind ?
Deaf ? Or C***d c*********d ?
So , the 3rd world kangaroo court you're striving to avoid is already here.
And you keep defending them.
Blaming everyone that isn't you.
LOL. none of what you just said is true.
Feb 2, 2022 18:40:24 #
[quote=proud republican]
That’s not what he’s saying. He’s saying
It will be conducted exactly the same only without the interventions of the wicked republicans defending trump. At all costs.
Same sort of trial only this time with real evidence, real testimonies, real transcripts,
Real witnesses, and a Real Judge.
In a real courtroom.
And with a real Donald Trump standing trial for his lifetime of criminal behavior.
Nobody to save his sorry worthless azz this time.
Justice for those who have been wronged in one way or another , by Trump.
Lied to , c***ted by, and stolen from.
Another point I forgot to make. Is
When trump came to court he only had 2 charges against him. There were 10 charges of obstruction, but they decided the two would accomplish the obvious outcome
Predisposed. They knew the republicans would let him walk so their effort was more symbolic than official.
He was impeached twice. Never punished, only impeached.
This time will be a whole different animal.
For poor Donald Jemima Trump.
One Patriot wrote:
Congressman Jamie Raskin said, “the committee is planning hearings that are similar to Trump’s second impeachment trial”.
Is Raskin saying that they are going to fabricate evidence like they did during Trump’s second impeachment trial?
Raskin was one of them that fabricated 1
Yeap, that's exactly what he's saying!😡
Is Raskin saying that they are going to fabricate evidence like they did during Trump’s second impeachment trial?
Raskin was one of them that fabricated 1
Yeap, that's exactly what he's saying!😡
That’s not what he’s saying. He’s saying
It will be conducted exactly the same only without the interventions of the wicked republicans defending trump. At all costs.
Same sort of trial only this time with real evidence, real testimonies, real transcripts,
Real witnesses, and a Real Judge.
In a real courtroom.
And with a real Donald Trump standing trial for his lifetime of criminal behavior.
Nobody to save his sorry worthless azz this time.
Justice for those who have been wronged in one way or another , by Trump.
Lied to , c***ted by, and stolen from.
Another point I forgot to make. Is
When trump came to court he only had 2 charges against him. There were 10 charges of obstruction, but they decided the two would accomplish the obvious outcome
Predisposed. They knew the republicans would let him walk so their effort was more symbolic than official.
He was impeached twice. Never punished, only impeached.
This time will be a whole different animal.
For poor Donald Jemima Trump.
Feb 2, 2022 18:41:11 #
JFlorio wrote:
LOL. none of what you just said is true.
Please point out what you think is false.
Feb 2, 2022 22:23:16 #
Milosia2 wrote:
No . You look it up.
The republicans refused to allow the mueller report into trumps trial. So, no evidence,
Not guilty.
It’s how they roll . Are you blind ?
Deaf ? Or C***d c*********d ?
So , the 3rd world kangaroo court you're striving to avoid is already here.
And you keep defending them.
Blaming everyone that isn't you.
The republicans refused to allow the mueller report into trumps trial. So, no evidence,
Not guilty.
It’s how they roll . Are you blind ?
Deaf ? Or C***d c*********d ?
So , the 3rd world kangaroo court you're striving to avoid is already here.
And you keep defending them.
Blaming everyone that isn't you.
Are you brain dead? That’s the first impeachment! We are talking about the second impeachment! WOW...
Feb 2, 2022 23:11:08 #
One Patriot wrote:
Are you brain dead? That’s the first impeachment! We are talking about the second impeachment! WOW...
So what was different ?
He walked on both because the candy azz republicans were scared chitless of him.
And they still are. As soon as one stands up to him , they all will, and we’ll have a new p**********l candidate .
Feb 2, 2022 23:44:44 #
Milosia2 wrote:
So what was different ?
He walked on both because the candy azz republicans were scared chitless of him.
And they still are. As soon as one stands up to him , they all will, and we’ll have a new p**********l candidate .
He walked on both because the candy azz republicans were scared chitless of him.
And they still are. As soon as one stands up to him , they all will, and we’ll have a new p**********l candidate .
First, I’m not a Republican! So, you can bring Trump or any other Republican you want up. It doesn’t change the facts!
Second, trying to throw names around only proves you don’t have a leg to stand on in this conversation (figuratively speaking).
Third, they did fabricate evidence in Trump second impeachment. That is a proven fact! Try to prove me wrong.
Feb 2, 2022 23:58:53 #
Feb 3, 2022 00:04:36 #
Milosia2 wrote:
That’s not what he’s saying. He’s saying br It wil... (show quote)
Wicked Republicans? Poor thing are you feeling picked on. If we give you a trophy like the winners get will you stop crying?
Feb 3, 2022 00:05:40 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.