permafrost Loc: Minnesota

From Quora....

Wouldn't a fourth Arizona 2020 e******n audit urged by Dr Kelli Ward, be truly substantive if all audit staff properly interviewed v**ers for which signatures seemed unclear, missing or duplicated? Surely anything less is incompetent, wasting money?
I live in Phoenix. If ANYONE came to my door, after almost 2 YEARS of this crap, and dared to challenge anything about my b****t, my signature, or anything else, I would go postal.

I am fed up with these huge-truck-driving, rude-bumper-sticker-showing, f**e-patriot “Lets-Go-Brandon”ing arseholes holding my state hostage on the word of a would-be dictator who refuses to accept that he lost.

It used to be a private matter who you v**ed for. Now, these jerks want to take away my permanent b****t, and make me stand in line in the Arizona heat for hours, so that they can look over my shoulder and make sure I’m not an illegal or a c***t or an animated dead person, and then ask me who I v**ed for on the way out.

Just. Stay. Away. From. Me.

(breathes in paper bag)

Liberty Tree

One person does not speak for everyone except in the liberal mind.

River Reb Loc: MS Delta

Phoenix, Minnesota?

guzzimaestro

More delusional rantings, move to Canada, you'll be happier there

moldyoldy

How many Arizona audits have to be laughed out of court before they stop wasting money.

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

As long as zealots are allowed to continue these audits we have not seen the last of them. Pretty sickening how one sick and dilusional man could completely destroy our e******n system.

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

I believe that’s a policy that
More describes the right.
The left has far more individual thinkers
Than the N**i Right.
The right also has far Terrorists.
The congressional right sets the model by all v****g Nein ! Nein ! Nein !
They all v**e the Same.
All good little N**is.

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

How about no more until they pay for the last ones.

Liberty Tree

Spoken like a delusional, rabid Marxist.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

It's called bullying and intimidation. The way to treat bullies, who are cowards to the core, is to call their bluff - jump through as many hoops as they place before you.......................and v**e them out.......................then remove the hoops.

Simple Sam Loc: USA

This is just my opinion, so no real sources. But it appears that if you have nothing to hide, then allow investigations until the t***h is ferreted out. Also my thoughts, if a b****t can not be traced back to a real person who is an American citizen who meets the criteria for v****g, then put them in a box, put them on a shelf and purge them from the total v**es. If e******n official, not canvasser, come across a person who is similar to the one depicted in your source, then their b****t should not be counted. It is obvious he/she has something to hide.

In the end, the true president, even if it is biden (and he sure has not been good for Americans) is sworn in, then most Americans will accept him as the winner. As it stands, many people that v**ed for biden are now suffering remorse, as you can see from his poll numbers and even the C*******t News Network is waking up.

it is also apparent that the individual in your source can not be the voice of Arizona, evidenced by the huge turn out for President Trump just a few days ago in Arizonia. Biden and democrats in general are in big trouble across America. So settle down, accept what Clinton established as the new normal in e******ns.

moldyoldy

Unfortunately the state gets stuck with the bill.

Simple Sam Loc: USA

Not true!

"The requester pays for the recount and is refunded if the recount reveals substantial error or fraud. Requested recounts rely on a request made by an interested party. When this happens, the party is usually responsible for the costs, unless the recount overturns the e******n results. If that happens, the state or county will cover the cost."

moldyoldy

'T***h is t***h': Trump dealt blow as Republican-led Arizona audit reaffirms Biden win

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/arizona-republicans-release-findings-widely-panned-e******n-audit-2021-09-24/

moldyoldy

Maybe yes, maybe no.

A recount is a process by which v**es cast in an e******n are re-tabulated to verify the accuracy of the original results. Recounts typically occur in the event of a close margin of victory, following accusations of e******n f***d, or due to the possibility of administrative errors.

Who pays for a recount typically depends upon whether the recount is automatic or requested. As of October 2020, 20 states had a statutory provision allowing for automatic recounts, and 43 states had a statutory provision allowing for requested recounts.

Automatic recounts are circumstantial, meaning they are not requested, but rather come into effect if e******n results meet certain criteria. Common criteria include a close v**e margin, which is a margin of victory between two candidates within a specified percentage or a raw number of v**es. If an e******n ends within that margin, certain states' laws mandate a recount. In the event of an automatic recount, states or counties usually cover the costs.[1][3]

Requested recounts require an interested party to ask for a recount. When an interested party requests a recount, he or she is normally responsible for most of the costs, unless the recount overturns the e******n results, in which case the state or county covers the cost.[4][5] In some states, such as Delaware, the state covers the cost of a requested recount regardless of the outcome.[6]

Additionally, some states cover the cost of a requested recount even if it does not overturn the initial result, but instead meets some other criteria. In Colorado, if a requested recount changes the e******n result so that it would have triggered an automatic recount, the state covers the costs.[7] Alaska pays for requested recounts if they change the results by four percent or more in favor of the requestor.[8]