One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Seven different flavors of STUPID:
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Jan 13, 2022 16:07:54   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
The New Republic dragged BIG TIME for crap piece claiming the filibuster is a racist PLOT against Kamala Harris

THEY’RE ONTO THE GOP! The filibuster is a plot … and a racist one at that … against Kamala Harris.

Yeah, that’s it.

Look for yourself, we’re not even making this nonsense up.

From The New Republic:

Over the course of many years and many think pieces, the case against the filibuster has been laid out. Typically, critics of the Jim Crow relic invoke various historical facts (some of which have apparently been lost on, or willfully ignored by, certain critical members of the Senate), as well as an array of practical and prudential bases. Onto the pile, however fruitlessly, let us add another: The filibuster is a plot against Vice President Kamala Harris—to take away her constitutional right to vote.

Holy sh*t.

Really?

But this part, this is the dumbest:

By a quirk of history, the plot against America is now also a plot against a Black woman’s right to vote. Who says the vice president has nothing to do?

*sigh*


Keith Burgin - The Toxic Something Podcast
@KeithBurgin
Replying to @newrepublic
So... for a couple centuries, the evil members of each minority party have been waiting for Kamala Harris?

Any alien abduction or Bigfoot stories you'd like to lay on us?


Michael Rice 🍻
@MikeRice74
Replying to @newrepublic
Why did Democrats use the filibuster 327 times against Republicans and Trump if it was so bad?
Right?

Were Democrats plotting against Mike Pence then?

So dumb.


Little Larry Sellers
@SpawnOfDanelaw
Replying to @newrepublic
This is 7 different flavors of stupid

This is an insult to seven different flavors of stupid everywhere.


Stephen L. Hall
@StephenLHall
Replying to @newrepublic
Apparently, you have to be an idiot to get published these days.

We’ll try not to take this personally.

HA HA HA HA HA


Tom Maguire
@Tom_Maguire
Replying to @newrepublic
Per the article, the Constitution "created a bicameral legislature, with each house operating by majority rule".

I can't find that in the Constitution. 2/3 for convictions/ expulsions and veto over-rides. Set their own rules otherwise is what I see.

BUT IT’S A PLOT.


Omicron Prime 🗽
@Armyfool1
Replying to @newrepublic
It’s not evenly split there’s 52 votes in bipartisan opposition so she doesn’t get to cast a vote. Also filibuster isn’t unconstitutional. It’s an inconvenience to a majority party.


john palomino
@johnpalomino
Replying to @newrepublic
Wtf is this ? lol

Fair question.

***

Reply
Jan 13, 2022 16:33:47   #
steve66613
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
The New Republic dragged BIG TIME for crap piece claiming the filibuster is a racist PLOT against Kamala Harris

THEY’RE ONTO THE GOP! The filibuster is a plot … and a racist one at that … against Kamala Harris.

Yeah, that’s it.

Look for yourself, we’re not even making this nonsense up.

From The New Republic:

Over the course of many years and many think pieces, the case against the filibuster has been laid out. Typically, critics of the Jim Crow relic invoke various historical facts (some of which have apparently been lost on, or willfully ignored by, certain critical members of the Senate), as well as an array of practical and prudential bases. Onto the pile, however fruitlessly, let us add another: The filibuster is a plot against Vice President Kamala Harris—to take away her constitutional right to vote.

Holy sh*t.

Really?

But this part, this is the dumbest:

By a quirk of history, the plot against America is now also a plot against a Black woman’s right to vote. Who says the vice president has nothing to do?

*sigh*


Keith Burgin - The Toxic Something Podcast
@KeithBurgin
Replying to @newrepublic
So... for a couple centuries, the evil members of each minority party have been waiting for Kamala Harris?

Any alien abduction or Bigfoot stories you'd like to lay on us?


Michael Rice 🍻
@MikeRice74
Replying to @newrepublic
Why did Democrats use the filibuster 327 times against Republicans and Trump if it was so bad?
Right?

Were Democrats plotting against Mike Pence then?

So dumb.


Little Larry Sellers
@SpawnOfDanelaw
Replying to @newrepublic
This is 7 different flavors of stupid

This is an insult to seven different flavors of stupid everywhere.


Stephen L. Hall
@StephenLHall
Replying to @newrepublic
Apparently, you have to be an idiot to get published these days.

We’ll try not to take this personally.

HA HA HA HA HA


Tom Maguire
@Tom_Maguire
Replying to @newrepublic
Per the article, the Constitution "created a bicameral legislature, with each house operating by majority rule".

I can't find that in the Constitution. 2/3 for convictions/ expulsions and veto over-rides. Set their own rules otherwise is what I see.

BUT IT’S A PLOT.


Omicron Prime 🗽
@Armyfool1
Replying to @newrepublic
It’s not evenly split there’s 52 votes in bipartisan opposition so she doesn’t get to cast a vote. Also filibuster isn’t unconstitutional. It’s an inconvenience to a majority party.


john palomino
@johnpalomino
Replying to @newrepublic
Wtf is this ? lol

Fair question.

***
b The New Republic dragged BIG TIME for crap piec... (show quote)


If the Rats eliminate the filibuster, the legislature will impeach Biden two/three times a week, after the midterms!

Reply
Jan 13, 2022 17:09:09   #
Weasel Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
The New Republic dragged BIG TIME for crap piece claiming the filibuster is a racist PLOT against Kamala Harris

THEY’RE ONTO THE GOP! The filibuster is a plot … and a racist one at that … against Kamala Harris.

Yeah, that’s it.

Look for yourself, we’re not even making this nonsense up.

From The New Republic:

Over the course of many years and many think pieces, the case against the filibuster has been laid out. Typically, critics of the Jim Crow relic invoke various historical facts (some of which have apparently been lost on, or willfully ignored by, certain critical members of the Senate), as well as an array of practical and prudential bases. Onto the pile, however fruitlessly, let us add another: The filibuster is a plot against Vice President Kamala Harris—to take away her constitutional right to vote.

Holy sh*t.

Really?

But this part, this is the dumbest:

By a quirk of history, the plot against America is now also a plot against a Black woman’s right to vote. Who says the vice president has nothing to do?

*sigh*


Keith Burgin - The Toxic Something Podcast
@KeithBurgin
Replying to @newrepublic
So... for a couple centuries, the evil members of each minority party have been waiting for Kamala Harris?

Any alien abduction or Bigfoot stories you'd like to lay on us?


Michael Rice 🍻
@MikeRice74
Replying to @newrepublic
Why did Democrats use the filibuster 327 times against Republicans and Trump if it was so bad?
Right?

Were Democrats plotting against Mike Pence then?

So dumb.


Little Larry Sellers
@SpawnOfDanelaw
Replying to @newrepublic
This is 7 different flavors of stupid

This is an insult to seven different flavors of stupid everywhere.


Stephen L. Hall
@StephenLHall
Replying to @newrepublic
Apparently, you have to be an idiot to get published these days.

We’ll try not to take this personally.

HA HA HA HA HA


Tom Maguire
@Tom_Maguire
Replying to @newrepublic
Per the article, the Constitution "created a bicameral legislature, with each house operating by majority rule".

I can't find that in the Constitution. 2/3 for convictions/ expulsions and veto over-rides. Set their own rules otherwise is what I see.

BUT IT’S A PLOT.


Omicron Prime 🗽
@Armyfool1
Replying to @newrepublic
It’s not evenly split there’s 52 votes in bipartisan opposition so she doesn’t get to cast a vote. Also filibuster isn’t unconstitutional. It’s an inconvenience to a majority party.


john palomino
@johnpalomino
Replying to @newrepublic
Wtf is this ? lol

Fair question.

***
b The New Republic dragged BIG TIME for crap piec... (show quote)



This is the first time in history that a President and his Administration has worked so hard against We The People, and America
Its self. Every single day we see something else from Biden that works to hurt us. Just looking at Inflation. This Idiot tells us that it is our fault, and even denies the things that we see first hand on a daily basis.
I will be so happy when they put his Head Stone in place at his Grave Sight.



Reply
 
 
Jan 13, 2022 17:18:25   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
steve66613 wrote:
If the Rats eliminate the filibuster, the legislature will impeach Biden two/three times a week, after the midterms!


Biden and his cronies need to be brought up on charges of treason. He's been working harder for the CCP than he has for Americans who are paying his salary.

Reply
Jan 13, 2022 17:21:58   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
Weasel wrote:
This is the first time in history that a President and his Administration has worked so hard against We The People, and America
Its self. Every single day we see something else from Biden that works to hurt us. Just looking at Inflation. This Idiot tells us that it is our fault, and even denies the things that we see first hand on a daily basis.
I will be so happy when they put his Head Stone in place at his Grave Sight.


Biden is working for Communist China (CCP) using our tax dollars for them instead of us. He's a traitor, and should be charged with treason. He and his cronies need to be executed.

Reply
Jan 13, 2022 17:43:30   #
Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
The New Republic dragged BIG TIME for crap piece claiming the filibuster is a racist PLOT against Kamala Harris

THEY’RE ONTO THE GOP! The filibuster is a plot … and a racist one at that … against Kamala Harris.

Yeah, that’s it.

Look for yourself, we’re not even making this nonsense up.

From The New Republic:

Over the course of many years and many think pieces, the case against the filibuster has been laid out. Typically, critics of the Jim Crow relic invoke various historical facts (some of which have apparently been lost on, or willfully ignored by, certain critical members of the Senate), as well as an array of practical and prudential bases. Onto the pile, however fruitlessly, let us add another: The filibuster is a plot against Vice President Kamala Harris—to take away her constitutional right to vote.

Holy sh*t.

Really?

But this part, this is the dumbest:

By a quirk of history, the plot against America is now also a plot against a Black woman’s right to vote. Who says the vice president has nothing to do?

*sigh*


Keith Burgin - The Toxic Something Podcast
@KeithBurgin
Replying to @newrepublic
So... for a couple centuries, the evil members of each minority party have been waiting for Kamala Harris?

Any alien abduction or Bigfoot stories you'd like to lay on us?


Michael Rice 🍻
@MikeRice74
Replying to @newrepublic
Why did Democrats use the filibuster 327 times against Republicans and Trump if it was so bad?
Right?

Were Democrats plotting against Mike Pence then?

So dumb.


Little Larry Sellers
@SpawnOfDanelaw
Replying to @newrepublic
This is 7 different flavors of stupid

This is an insult to seven different flavors of stupid everywhere.


Stephen L. Hall
@StephenLHall
Replying to @newrepublic
Apparently, you have to be an idiot to get published these days.

We’ll try not to take this personally.

HA HA HA HA HA


Tom Maguire
@Tom_Maguire
Replying to @newrepublic
Per the article, the Constitution "created a bicameral legislature, with each house operating by majority rule".

I can't find that in the Constitution. 2/3 for convictions/ expulsions and veto over-rides. Set their own rules otherwise is what I see.

BUT IT’S A PLOT.


Omicron Prime 🗽
@Armyfool1
Replying to @newrepublic
It’s not evenly split there’s 52 votes in bipartisan opposition so she doesn’t get to cast a vote. Also filibuster isn’t unconstitutional. It’s an inconvenience to a majority party.


john palomino
@johnpalomino
Replying to @newrepublic
Wtf is this ? lol

Fair question.

***
b The New Republic dragged BIG TIME for crap piec... (show quote)


I may be wrong, but I believe the dems were for the filibuster when Trump was in the White House. Now they're totally against it. Strange, isn't it.

Reply
Jan 13, 2022 18:09:28   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
Peaver Bogart wrote:
I may be wrong, but I believe the dems were for the filibuster when Trump was in the White House. Now they're totally against it. Strange, isn't it.


Yes, someone pointed out that the Dems used the filibuster over 300 times when Trump was in office.

Reply
 
 
Jan 13, 2022 18:19:28   #
Bassman65
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
The New Republic dragged BIG TIME for crap piece claiming the filibuster is a racist PLOT against Kamala Harris

THEY’RE ONTO THE GOP! The filibuster is a plot … and a racist one at that … against Kamala Harris.

Yeah, that’s it.

Look for yourself, we’re not even making this nonsense up.

From The New Republic:

Over the course of many years and many think pieces, the case against the filibuster has been laid out. Typically, critics of the Jim Crow relic invoke various historical facts (some of which have apparently been lost on, or willfully ignored by, certain critical members of the Senate), as well as an array of practical and prudential bases. Onto the pile, however fruitlessly, let us add another: The filibuster is a plot against Vice President Kamala Harris—to take away her constitutional right to vote.

Holy sh*t.

Really?

But this part, this is the dumbest:

By a quirk of history, the plot against America is now also a plot against a Black woman’s right to vote. Who says the vice president has nothing to do?

*sigh*


Keith Burgin - The Toxic Something Podcast
@KeithBurgin
Replying to @newrepublic
So... for a couple centuries, the evil members of each minority party have been waiting for Kamala Harris?

Any alien abduction or Bigfoot stories you'd like to lay on us?


Michael Rice 🍻
@MikeRice74
Replying to @newrepublic
Why did Democrats use the filibuster 327 times against Republicans and Trump if it was so bad?
Right?

Were Democrats plotting against Mike Pence then?

So dumb.


Little Larry Sellers
@SpawnOfDanelaw
Replying to @newrepublic
This is 7 different flavors of stupid

This is an insult to seven different flavors of stupid everywhere.


Stephen L. Hall
@StephenLHall
Replying to @newrepublic
Apparently, you have to be an idiot to get published these days.

We’ll try not to take this personally.

HA HA HA HA HA


Tom Maguire
@Tom_Maguire
Replying to @newrepublic
Per the article, the Constitution "created a bicameral legislature, with each house operating by majority rule".

I can't find that in the Constitution. 2/3 for convictions/ expulsions and veto over-rides. Set their own rules otherwise is what I see.

BUT IT’S A PLOT.


Omicron Prime 🗽
@Armyfool1
Replying to @newrepublic
It’s not evenly split there’s 52 votes in bipartisan opposition so she doesn’t get to cast a vote. Also filibuster isn’t unconstitutional. It’s an inconvenience to a majority party.


john palomino
@johnpalomino
Replying to @newrepublic
Wtf is this ? lol

Fair question.

***
b The New Republic dragged BIG TIME for crap piec... (show quote)

With a straight face? Wow

Reply
Jan 13, 2022 18:41:33   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
Bassman65 wrote:
With a straight face? Wow


👍👍👍👍

And the beat goes on...

Reply
Jan 13, 2022 19:27:49   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Peaver Bogart wrote:
I may be wrong, but I believe the dems were for the filibuster when Trump was in the White House. Now they're totally against it. Strange, isn't it.


You know about Senator Tom Cotton's impassioned defense of the filibuster? The speech was first given by Schmuck Schumer when the Dems were in the minority.

Reply
Jan 13, 2022 20:45:45   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Queens, New York City
 
Weasel wrote:
This is the first time in history that a President and his Administration has worked so hard against We The People, and America
Its self. Every single day we see something else from Biden that works to hurt us. Just looking at Inflation. This Idiot tells us that it is our fault, and even denies the things that we see first hand on a daily basis.
I will be so happy when they put his Head Stone in place at his Grave Sight.


Weasel, Trump is the President that worked against the American people, not Biden. It was Trump that urged the mob at his speech to fight like hell to take back your country. That is urging sedition, and a coup, not to mention that he is the first president I can think of that tried to stop the peaceful transfer of power.
Inflation is a world wide phenomena, not just American. It came about because of the effects of the covid 19 pandemic which caused a shortage of goods and services in the world market
Exactly what other things do we see on a daily basis that make him such a terrible President?
The Republican Party refuses to work with him on anything that could help the American people, except for the infrastructure bill. By the way, Trump promised the American people an infrastructure bill, but Never delivered.

Reply
 
 
Jan 13, 2022 22:14:59   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Weasel, Trump is the President that worked against the American people, not Biden. It was Trump that urged the mob at his speech to fight like hell to take back your country. That is urging sedition, and a coup, not to mention that he is the first president I can think of that tried to stop the peaceful transfer of power.
Inflation is a world wide phenomena, not just American. It came about because of the effects of the covid 19 pandemic which caused a shortage of goods and services in the world market
Exactly what other things do we see on a daily basis that make him such a terrible President?
The Republican Party refuses to work with him on anything that could help the American people, except for the infrastructure bill. By the way, Trump promised the American people an infrastructure bill, but Never delivered.
Weasel, Trump is the President that worked against... (show quote)


I'll bet you're one of those who took the Covid vaccination because you think the government is honest?

Reply
Jan 14, 2022 08:40:24   #
billy a Loc: South Florida
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
The New Republic dragged BIG TIME for crap piece claiming the filibuster is a racist PLOT against Kamala Harris

THEY’RE ONTO THE GOP! The filibuster is a plot … and a racist one at that … against Kamala Harris.

Yeah, that’s it.

Look for yourself, we’re not even making this nonsense up.

From The New Republic:

Over the course of many years and many think pieces, the case against the filibuster has been laid out. Typically, critics of the Jim Crow relic invoke various historical facts (some of which have apparently been lost on, or willfully ignored by, certain critical members of the Senate), as well as an array of practical and prudential bases. Onto the pile, however fruitlessly, let us add another: The filibuster is a plot against Vice President Kamala Harris—to take away her constitutional right to vote.

Holy sh*t.

Really?

But this part, this is the dumbest:

By a quirk of history, the plot against America is now also a plot against a Black woman’s right to vote. Who says the vice president has nothing to do?

*sigh*


Keith Burgin - The Toxic Something Podcast
@KeithBurgin
Replying to @newrepublic
So... for a couple centuries, the evil members of each minority party have been waiting for Kamala Harris?

Any alien abduction or Bigfoot stories you'd like to lay on us?


Michael Rice 🍻
@MikeRice74
Replying to @newrepublic
Why did Democrats use the filibuster 327 times against Republicans and Trump if it was so bad?
Right?

Were Democrats plotting against Mike Pence then?

So dumb.


Little Larry Sellers
@SpawnOfDanelaw
Replying to @newrepublic
This is 7 different flavors of stupid

This is an insult to seven different flavors of stupid everywhere.


Stephen L. Hall
@StephenLHall
Replying to @newrepublic
Apparently, you have to be an idiot to get published these days.

We’ll try not to take this personally.

HA HA HA HA HA


Tom Maguire
@Tom_Maguire
Replying to @newrepublic
Per the article, the Constitution "created a bicameral legislature, with each house operating by majority rule".

I can't find that in the Constitution. 2/3 for convictions/ expulsions and veto over-rides. Set their own rules otherwise is what I see.

BUT IT’S A PLOT.


Omicron Prime 🗽
@Armyfool1
Replying to @newrepublic
It’s not evenly split there’s 52 votes in bipartisan opposition so she doesn’t get to cast a vote. Also filibuster isn’t unconstitutional. It’s an inconvenience to a majority party.


john palomino
@johnpalomino
Replying to @newrepublic
Wtf is this ? lol

Fair question.

***
b The New Republic dragged BIG TIME for crap piec... (show quote)


Seven flavors of totalitarian ; Desperate...Shivering-scared...Dangerously stupid...Elitist...Leaderless...Pathetic...Everybody after joey biden. I need to repeat Desperate. fjb

Reply
Jan 14, 2022 09:32:10   #
microphor
 
Peaver Bogart wrote:
I may be wrong, but I believe the dems were for the filibuster when Trump was in the White House. Now they're totally against it. Strange, isn't it.


you're not wrong, they used it over 200 times, just more hypocrisy..

Reply
Jan 14, 2022 09:36:39   #
microphor
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
You know about Senator Tom Cotton's impassioned defense of the filibuster? The speech was first given by Schmuck Schumer when the Dems were in the minority.


yeah I saw that, maybe the dems on OPP should look it up but they want, don't want to know the truth!
https://www.foxnews.com/media/chuck-schumer-filibuster-flashback-2017

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2022 IDF International Technologies, Inc.