Concrete Barriers Are Going Up Around The White House And Here’s The Reason Why (Photos&Video)
Jan 13, 2022 16:42:12 #
kemmer wrote:
.
That savage mob didn’t need any “coercing” to attack the Capitol; the creatures were chanting “Hang Mike Pence”, h*****g from the building, and busting the windows and doors.
That savage mob didn’t need any “coercing” to attack the Capitol; the creatures were chanting “Hang Mike Pence”, h*****g from the building, and busting the windows and doors.
Similar to Seattle, Portland, and Minneapolis.
Jan 13, 2022 17:13:01 #
Ri-chard wrote:
Why were the Pentagon cameras down on 9/11? No record of what the incoming was.
The collective testimonies of 110 eyewitnesses, including military personnel and pilots, plus aircraft wreckage, including the FDR, confirmed an American Airlines Boeing 757-223, registration # N644AA, crashed into the Pentagon.
Jan 13, 2022 17:15:01 #
kemmer wrote:
Who created your reality?It’s astonishing how you Trump loons have created your own reality.
Jan 13, 2022 17:26:37 #
Conservative Girl wrote:
I'm sure everyone has different conclusions .... especially when the News Organizations are silent.
But why are the white house cameras down, too? https://defiantamerica.com/concrete-barriers-are-going-up-around-the-white-house-and-heres-the-reason-why-photosvideo/
But why are the white house cameras down, too? https://defiantamerica.com/concrete-barriers-are-going-up-around-the-white-house-and-heres-the-reason-why-photosvideo/
Your defiant america web site serves f**e news to the right-wing. The white house has a live camera outside you can see there is no wall. You've been duped. Again.
Jan 13, 2022 17:30:07 #
kemmer wrote:
.
That savage mob didn’t need any “coercing” to attack the Capitol; the creatures were chanting “Hang Mike Pence”, h*****g from the building, and busting the windows and doors.
That savage mob didn’t need any “coercing” to attack the Capitol; the creatures were chanting “Hang Mike Pence”, h*****g from the building, and busting the windows and doors.
I'm sorry, the first thing I did when I read this was laugh. Savage mob??!!!
.....................................
Jan 13, 2022 17:30:49 #
Justice101 wrote:
They aren't tall enough to protect that lying old fool in the white house. The spaces in the barriers might be intended for the gunners. Watch out protesters! 
If anyone believes this story, I ask you, who's the fool?
Jan 13, 2022 17:50:03 #
EmilyD wrote:
What makes you think I am not upset? I am very ups... (show quote)
The number of troops is 10,000, and the whole story is a proven lie you can find the facts on any fact check source. Multiple sites have called it a false story. But don't let the facts get in your way.
Jan 13, 2022 18:06:58 #
Geo wrote:
The number of troops is 10,000, and the whole story is a proven lie you can find the facts on any fact check source. Multiple sites have called it a false story. But don't let the facts get in your way.
Yes, I'm sorry, you're right. It was 10,000. That was a typo, but I can't find a single site that says that is a proven lie other than a biased "fact check" site. I don't believe any "fact check" site - they are all privately owned, and they are all biased, with Snopes (left leaning), Politifact (left leaning) and Mediabiasfactcheck (right leaning) the main ones that are so obviously biased, anyone that believes them is fooling themselves.
There are a lot of sites that say this DID happen. Show me one where it says this is a proven lie. Otherwise, I don't believe a word of what you're saying.
Jan 13, 2022 19:05:02 #
Ri-chard wrote:
Why were the Pentagon cameras down on 9/11? No record of what the incoming was.
They weren't down, they posted 9/11 pictures from the security cameras.
Jan 13, 2022 19:30:21 #
Jan 13, 2022 19:46:40 #
[quote=EmilyD]Yes, I'm sorry, you're right. It was 10,000. That was a typo, but I can't find a single site that says that is a proven lie other than a biased "fact check" site. I don't believe any "fact check" site - they are all privately owned, and they are all biased, with Snopes (left leaning), Politifact (left leaning) and Mediabiasfactcheck (right leaning) the main ones that are so obviously biased, anyone that believes them is fooling themselves.
There are a lot of sites that say this DID happen. Show me one where it says this is a proven lie. Otherwise, I don't believe a word of what
Of course you don't want to believe a fact check site, that should tell you something, when someone tells you the t***h you deny it. When someone tells you something that fits what you want to believe, you don't question it. The perfect republican.
There is no block wall around the white house. You were duped.
There are a lot of sites that say this DID happen. Show me one where it says this is a proven lie. Otherwise, I don't believe a word of what
Of course you don't want to believe a fact check site, that should tell you something, when someone tells you the t***h you deny it. When someone tells you something that fits what you want to believe, you don't question it. The perfect republican.
There is no block wall around the white house. You were duped.
Jan 13, 2022 20:31:44 #
kemmer wrote:
It’s astonishing how you Trump loons have created your own reality.
Isn't it.
They don't even try to find the t***h. They just listen to a few cockeyed propagandists (you know who I mean) and are continuing the great tradition of being dittoheads.
Jan 13, 2022 20:32:19 #
Jan 13, 2022 20:37:41 #
[quote=Geo]
There may not be but you should not put so much blind trust in ‘fact check’ sites. That says a lot
Used to be it was the democrats who rightly questioned the institutions they now so blindly trust.
EmilyD wrote:
Yes, I'm sorry, you're right. It was 10,000. That ... (show quote)
There may not be but you should not put so much blind trust in ‘fact check’ sites. That says a lot
Used to be it was the democrats who rightly questioned the institutions they now so blindly trust.
Jan 13, 2022 21:22:55 #
[quote=Geo]
Where did I say there was a block wall? There is one being built as the original poster has pointed out. And we are wondering what it's all about. I guess we'll find out soon enough. There is speculation that it is everything from a water fountain to pr********n for some kind of battle. I don't know how someone can be "duped" when no one knows what's going on and why there is equipment placing concrete blocks in front of the White House.
You can go ahead and believe fact check sites. If you read my earlier post, you would have seen that the three sites I listed were not all liberal fact check sites. When I said I don't believe them, that means I don't believe ANY of them, whether they lean left or right. They are all biased. Some are part of newscasts, and some are privately owned. All of them, in my opinion and in my experience, are biased. What I will believe is something that is true fact and cannot be disproved. Opinions are not facts.
EmilyD wrote:
Yes, I'm sorry, you're right. It was 10,000. That ... (show quote)
Geo wrote:
Of course you don't want to believe a fact check site, that should tell you something, when someone tells you the t***h you deny it. When someone tells you something that fits what you want to believe, you don't question it. The perfect republican.
There is no block wall around the white house. You were duped.
There is no block wall around the white house. You were duped.
Where did I say there was a block wall? There is one being built as the original poster has pointed out. And we are wondering what it's all about. I guess we'll find out soon enough. There is speculation that it is everything from a water fountain to pr********n for some kind of battle. I don't know how someone can be "duped" when no one knows what's going on and why there is equipment placing concrete blocks in front of the White House.
You can go ahead and believe fact check sites. If you read my earlier post, you would have seen that the three sites I listed were not all liberal fact check sites. When I said I don't believe them, that means I don't believe ANY of them, whether they lean left or right. They are all biased. Some are part of newscasts, and some are privately owned. All of them, in my opinion and in my experience, are biased. What I will believe is something that is true fact and cannot be disproved. Opinions are not facts.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.