Garland has been coming under increasing criticism for not going after those in trump's administration involved in attempting to overturn the e******n.
Of course the right will scream and yell about any attempts to hold anyone accountable being nothing but overreach by the Biden administration going after trump people the left h**es. Meanwhile the left sees it as avoiding any optics of political bias, saying that not going after anyone that broke the law is worse than using the office to go after political foes.
Well, Garland made it clear that he intends to act with a blind eye towards any political agendas, and adhere to the rule of law. He vowed that anyone including those at the top who have broken laws will be prosecuted...
In conjunction with that the house has indicated that they will be pursuing the clearly stated letter of the law pertaining to interfering with the faithful execution of e******n procedures, and that there could be as many as a thousand people with sights set on them for criminal prosecution referrals. There has already been talk that over a hundred republicans could be in violation of supporting an attempted c**p.
woodguru wrote:
Garland has been coming under increasing criticism for not going after those in trump's administration involved in attempting to overturn the e******n.
Of course the right will scream and yell about any attempts to hold anyone accountable being nothing but overreach by the Biden administration going after trump people the left h**es. Meanwhile the left sees it as avoiding any optics of political bias, saying that not going after anyone that broke the law is worse than using the office to go after political foes.
Well, Garland made it clear that he intends to act with a blind eye towards any political agendas, and adhere to the rule of law. He vowed that anyone including those at the top who have broken laws will be prosecuted...
In conjunction with that the house has indicated that they will be pursuing the clearly stated letter of the law pertaining to interfering with the faithful execution of e******n procedures, and that there could be as many as a thousand people with sights set on them for criminal prosecution referrals. There has already been talk that over a hundred republicans could be in violation of supporting an attempted c**p.
Garland has been coming under increasing criticism... (
show quote)
No blind eye with Garland. Both of his eyes are fixed on Republican enemies. Selective prosecution will reign. Only positive is he is not on the SCOTUS.
woodguru wrote:
Garland has been coming under increasing criticism for not going after those in trump's administration involved in attempting to overturn the e******n.
Of course the right will scream and yell about any attempts to hold anyone accountable being nothing but overreach by the Biden administration going after trump people the left h**es. Meanwhile the left sees it as avoiding any optics of political bias, saying that not going after anyone that broke the law is worse than using the office to go after political foes.
Well, Garland made it clear that he intends to act with a blind eye towards any political agendas, and adhere to the rule of law. He vowed that anyone including those at the top who have broken laws will be prosecuted...
In conjunction with that the house has indicated that they will be pursuing the clearly stated letter of the law pertaining to interfering with the faithful execution of e******n procedures, and that there could be as many as a thousand people with sights set on them for criminal prosecution referrals. There has already been talk that over a hundred republicans could be in violation of supporting an attempted c**p.
Garland has been coming under increasing criticism... (
show quote)
This should free up a few Congressional Seats.
To allow them to continue as Congressmen is ludicrous.
Liberty Tree wrote:
No blind eye with Garland. Both of his eyes are fixed on Republican enemies. Selective prosecution will reign. Only positive is he is not on the SCOTUS.
Selective Prosecution ?
That’s funny right there.!
That is not what this is. The I**********nists know who they are. The s******nists know who they are . The t*****rs know who they are. They are easy to find because they are the ones who still think they are right, and everyone else is wrong.
That is not selective prosecution. Selective Prosecution is a N**i Tool used to arrest civilians who are against the status quo. And used to harass opponents.
SGM B
Loc: TEXAS but live in Alabama now
woodguru wrote:
Garland has been coming under increasing criticism for not going after those in trump's administration involved in attempting to overturn the e******n.
Of course the right will scream and yell about any attempts to hold anyone accountable being nothing but overreach by the Biden administration going after trump people the left h**es. Meanwhile the left sees it as avoiding any optics of political bias, saying that not going after anyone that broke the law is worse than using the office to go after political foes.
Well, Garland made it clear that he intends to act with a blind eye towards any political agendas, and adhere to the rule of law. He vowed that anyone including those at the top who have broken laws will be prosecuted...
In conjunction with that the house has indicated that they will be pursuing the clearly stated letter of the law pertaining to interfering with the faithful execution of e******n procedures, and that there could be as many as a thousand people with sights set on them for criminal prosecution referrals. There has already been talk that over a hundred republicans could be in violation of supporting an attempted c**p.
Garland has been coming under increasing criticism... (
show quote)
Really? I guess I missed that.
“There has already been talk that over a hundred republicans could be in violation of supporting an attempted c**p.”
Which bunch of buffoons are doing the talking? Sounds like it might be Adam S**t and the RINO Liz Cheney.
woodguru wrote:
Garland has been coming under increasing criticism for not going after those in trump's administration involved in attempting to overturn the e******n.
Of course the right will scream and yell about any attempts to hold anyone accountable being nothing but overreach by the Biden administration going after trump people the left h**es. Meanwhile the left sees it as avoiding any optics of political bias, saying that not going after anyone that broke the law is worse than using the office to go after political foes.
Well, Garland made it clear that he intends to act with a blind eye towards any political agendas, and adhere to the rule of law. He vowed that anyone including those at the top who have broken laws will be prosecuted...
In conjunction with that the house has indicated that they will be pursuing the clearly stated letter of the law pertaining to interfering with the faithful execution of e******n procedures, and that there could be as many as a thousand people with sights set on them for criminal prosecution referrals. There has already been talk that over a hundred republicans could be in violation of supporting an attempted c**p.
Garland has been coming under increasing criticism... (
show quote)
There was no attempted c**p. Your following of the Democratic propaganda is strong. Most Americans know this "i**********n" talk is nothing but political theatrics and couldn't care less about J****** 6th.
SGM B
Loc: TEXAS but live in Alabama now
Milosia2 wrote:
Selective Prosecution ?
That’s funny right there.!
That is not what this is. The I**********nists know who they are. The s******nists know who they are . The t*****rs know who they are. They are easy to find because they are the ones who still think they are right, and everyone else is wrong.
That is not selective prosecution. Selective Prosecution is a N**i Tool used to arrest civilians who are against the status quo. And used to harass opponents.
Well hell, oh magnanimous one - tell us, if you can - the name of any protester who has been charged, or convicted of “i**********n”. 🧐🧐
Milosia2 wrote:
Selective Prosecution ?
That’s funny right there.!
That is not what this is. The I**********nists know who they are. The s******nists know who they are . The t*****rs know who they are. They are easy to find because they are the ones who still think they are right, and everyone else is wrong.
That is not selective prosecution. Selective Prosecution is a N**i Tool used to arrest civilians who are against the status quo. And used to harass opponents.
EWE are really a sad case
Is that the tattoo on your left ball. The large one. The size of a marble.
woodguru wrote:
Garland has been coming under increasing criticism for not going after those in trump's administration involved in attempting to overturn the e******n.
Of course the right will scream and yell about any attempts to hold anyone accountable being nothing but overreach by the Biden administration going after trump people the left h**es. Meanwhile the left sees it as avoiding any optics of political bias, saying that not going after anyone that broke the law is worse than using the office to go after political foes.
Well, Garland made it clear that he intends to act with a blind eye towards any political agendas, and adhere to the rule of law. He vowed that anyone including those at the top who have broken laws will be prosecuted...
In conjunction with that the house has indicated that they will be pursuing the clearly stated letter of the law pertaining to interfering with the faithful execution of e******n procedures, and that there could be as many as a thousand people with sights set on them for criminal prosecution referrals. There has already been talk that over a hundred republicans could be in violation of supporting an attempted c**p.
Garland has been coming under increasing criticism... (
show quote)
Blah, blah, blah. The fact that you need evidence and not Demoncrat mind reading may have something to do with that.
SGM B wrote:
Really? I guess I missed that.
“There has already been talk that over a hundred republicans could be in violation of supporting an attempted c**p.”
Which bunch of buffoons are doing the talking? Sounds like it might be Adam S**t and the RINO Liz Cheney.
Well if there's been "talk", it must be true. Evidence unnecessary?
woodguru wrote:
Garland has been coming under increasing criticism for not going after those in trump's administration involved in attempting to overturn the e******n.
Of course the right will scream and yell about any attempts to hold anyone accountable being nothing but overreach by the Biden administration going after trump people the left h**es. Meanwhile the left sees it as avoiding any optics of political bias, saying that not going after anyone that broke the law is worse than using the office to go after political foes.
Well, Garland made it clear that he intends to act with a blind eye towards any political agendas, and adhere to the rule of law. He vowed that anyone including those at the top who have broken laws will be prosecuted...
In conjunction with that the house has indicated that they will be pursuing the clearly stated letter of the law pertaining to interfering with the faithful execution of e******n procedures, and that there could be as many as a thousand people with sights set on them for criminal prosecution referrals. There has already been talk that over a hundred republicans could be in violation of supporting an attempted c**p.
Garland has been coming under increasing criticism... (
show quote)
He should be prosecuting Christopher Wray.
For abuse of the Constitution.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.