The Right Is Looking To Forcibly Take Minority Control, While The Left Just Wants F**r E******ns And Respect For Majorities
In a state we are seeing a different dynamic than the e*******l college that decides the US p**********l e******ns, in states we are seeing red controlled states that may have a significant edge in registered v**ers that favors democrats. We know and fully understand that these states v**e heavily republican in lightly populated rural areas, and democrat in heavily populated cities and suburbs...
...and republicans don't like it, they reject the constitutional and democratic premise that supports majority control, republicans do not support highly populated cities being allowed to control how the state does things.
This is in a nut shell the same premise that fuels the national concept of sparsely populated states having the same say that states with huge populations do.
Democracy is about majority control, not any of the concepts that shift control to minority populations
With all this horse crap about fraud, democrats typically outnumber republicans with registered v**ers, when they get out the v**e they win, that's how it works...and the bottom line is that the right wants nothing to do with making it easier to v**e for those democratic majorities living in cities. They want nothing to do with making v****g safer and more secure when making it easier to v**e comes with that territory. The want chaos and confusion so that e******ns can be contested and overturned.
The right knows full well that making v****g easier and more secure means they lose the control their minorities have c***ted and fought to keep.
woodguru wrote:
In a state we are seeing a different dynamic than the e*******l college that decides the US p**********l e******ns, in states we are seeing red controlled states that may have a significant edge in registered v**ers that favors democrats. We know and fully understand that these states v**e heavily republican in lightly populated rural areas, and democrat in heavily populated cities and suburbs...
...and republicans don't like it, they reject the constitutional and democratic premise that supports majority control, republicans do not support highly populated cities being allowed to control how the state does things.
This is in a nut shell the same premise that fuels the national concept of sparsely populated states having the same say that states with huge populations do.
Democracy is about majority control, not any of the concepts that shift control to minority populations
With all this horse crap about fraud, democrats typically outnumber republicans with registered v**ers, when they get out the v**e they win, that's how it works...and the bottom line is that the right wants nothing to do with making it easier to v**e for those democratic majorities living in cities. They want nothing to do with making v****g safer and more secure when making it easier to v**e comes with that territory. The want chaos and confusion so that e******ns can be contested and overturned.
The right knows full well that making v****g easier and more secure means they lose the control their minorities have c***ted and fought to keep.
In a state we are seeing a different dynamic than ... (
show quote)
Sadly , this won’t benefit any of them.
The onslaught is nothing more than angry Oligarchian ideology.
Nothing to do with republicans. Americans,
American values , freedoms Liberties,
Democracy.
woodguru wrote:
In a state we are seeing a different dynamic than the e*******l college that decides the US p**********l e******ns, in states we are seeing red controlled states that may have a significant edge in registered v**ers that favors democrats. We know and fully understand that these states v**e heavily republican in lightly populated rural areas, and democrat in heavily populated cities and suburbs...
...and republicans don't like it, they reject the constitutional and democratic premise that supports majority control, republicans do not support highly populated cities being allowed to control how the state does things.
This is in a nut shell the same premise that fuels the national concept of sparsely populated states having the same say that states with huge populations do.
Democracy is about majority control, not any of the concepts that shift control to minority populations
With all this horse crap about fraud, democrats typically outnumber republicans with registered v**ers, when they get out the v**e they win, that's how it works...and the bottom line is that the right wants nothing to do with making it easier to v**e for those democratic majorities living in cities. They want nothing to do with making v****g safer and more secure when making it easier to v**e comes with that territory. The want chaos and confusion so that e******ns can be contested and overturned.
The right knows full well that making v****g easier and more secure means they lose the control their minorities have c***ted and fought to keep.
In a state we are seeing a different dynamic than ... (
show quote)
***The Right Is Looking To Forcibly Take Minority Control, While The Left Just Wants F**r E******ns And Respect For Majorities
>>>As usual, pure bull schitte. Not worth reading.
Where's Bad Bob when we need him....
woodguru wrote:
In a state we are seeing a different dynamic than the e*******l college that decides the US p**********l e******ns, in states we are seeing red controlled states that may have a significant edge in registered v**ers that favors democrats. We know and fully understand that these states v**e heavily republican in lightly populated rural areas, and democrat in heavily populated cities and suburbs...
...and republicans don't like it, they reject the constitutional and democratic premise that supports majority control, republicans do not support highly populated cities being allowed to control how the state does things.
This is in a nut shell the same premise that fuels the national concept of sparsely populated states having the same say that states with huge populations do.
Democracy is about majority control, not any of the concepts that shift control to minority populations
With all this horse crap about fraud, democrats typically outnumber republicans with registered v**ers, when they get out the v**e they win, that's how it works...and the bottom line is that the right wants nothing to do with making it easier to v**e for those democratic majorities living in cities. They want nothing to do with making v****g safer and more secure when making it easier to v**e comes with that territory. The want chaos and confusion so that e******ns can be contested and overturned.
The right knows full well that making v****g easier and more secure means they lose the control their minorities have c***ted and fought to keep.
In a state we are seeing a different dynamic than ... (
show quote)
So your in favor of New York and Los Angeles deciding for the whole country who will be our president? With maybe Chicago and San Francisco . Four cities and two or three states may have a majority of v**es but isn't any way a majority of the country.
LogicallyRight wrote:
***The Right Is Looking To Forcibly Take Minority Control, While The Left Just Wants F**r E******ns And Respect For Majorities
>>>As usual, pure bull schitte. Not worth reading.
He just post this BS to fire people up. Ignore him.
Liberty Tree wrote:
He just post this BS to fire people up. Ignore him.
Yep. He's a bonifide candidate for the rubber room.
Ever notice how when the red team was in charge, we lived in a representative republic, but when the blue team has the slimmest majority, it's majority rule?
woodguru wrote:
In a state we are seeing a different dynamic than the e*******l college that decides the US p**********l e******ns, in states we are seeing red controlled states that may have a significant edge in registered v**ers that favors democrats. We know and fully understand that these states v**e heavily republican in lightly populated rural areas, and democrat in heavily populated cities and suburbs...
...and republicans don't like it, they reject the constitutional and democratic premise that supports majority control, republicans do not support highly populated cities being allowed to control how the state does things.
This is in a nut shell the same premise that fuels the national concept of sparsely populated states having the same say that states with huge populations do.
Democracy is about majority control, not any of the concepts that shift control to minority populations
With all this horse crap about fraud, democrats typically outnumber republicans with registered v**ers, when they get out the v**e they win, that's how it works...and the bottom line is that the right wants nothing to do with making it easier to v**e for those democratic majorities living in cities. They want nothing to do with making v****g safer and more secure when making it easier to v**e comes with that territory. The want chaos and confusion so that e******ns can be contested and overturned.
The right knows full well that making v****g easier and more secure means they lose the control their minorities have c***ted and fought to keep.
In a state we are seeing a different dynamic than ... (
show quote)
The left cares nothing about f**r e******ns. They know the odds are against them.
woodguru wrote:
In a state we are seeing a different dynamic than the e*******l college that decides the US p**********l e******ns, in states we are seeing red controlled states that may have a significant edge in registered v**ers that favors democrats. We know and fully understand that these states v**e heavily republican in lightly populated rural areas, and democrat in heavily populated cities and suburbs...
...and republicans don't like it, they reject the constitutional and democratic premise that supports majority control, republicans do not support highly populated cities being allowed to control how the state does things.
This is in a nut shell the same premise that fuels the national concept of sparsely populated states having the same say that states with huge populations do.
Democracy is about majority control, not any of the concepts that shift control to minority populations
With all this horse crap about fraud, democrats typically outnumber republicans with registered v**ers, when they get out the v**e they win, that's how it works...and the bottom line is that the right wants nothing to do with making it easier to v**e for those democratic majorities living in cities. They want nothing to do with making v****g safer and more secure when making it easier to v**e comes with that territory. The want chaos and confusion so that e******ns can be contested and overturned.
The right knows full well that making v****g easier and more secure means they lose the control their minorities have c***ted and fought to keep.
In a state we are seeing a different dynamic than ... (
show quote)
You are absolutely correct. Now, don't you wish we lived in a democracy? pffft.
woodguru wrote:
In a state we are seeing a different dynamic than the e*******l college that decides the US p**********l e******ns, in states we are seeing red controlled states that may have a significant edge in registered v**ers that favors democrats. We know and fully understand that these states v**e heavily republican in lightly populated rural areas, and democrat in heavily populated cities and suburbs...
...and republicans don't like it, they reject the constitutional and democratic premise that supports majority control, republicans do not support highly populated cities being allowed to control how the state does things.
This is in a nut shell the same premise that fuels the national concept of sparsely populated states having the same say that states with huge populations do.
Democracy is about majority control, not any of the concepts that shift control to minority populations
With all this horse crap about fraud, democrats typically outnumber republicans with registered v**ers, when they get out the v**e they win, that's how it works...and the bottom line is that the right wants nothing to do with making it easier to v**e for those democratic majorities living in cities. They want nothing to do with making v****g safer and more secure when making it easier to v**e comes with that territory. The want chaos and confusion so that e******ns can be contested and overturned.
The right knows full well that making v****g easier and more secure means they lose the control their minorities have c***ted and fought to keep.
In a state we are seeing a different dynamic than ... (
show quote)
If the left wanted f**r e******ns, they would have had one. They didn't. Some us saw with our own eyes observers being pushed so far way they couldn't see what was or wasn't being counted, we saw the woman yelling at the old lady that they had agreed hoe she would v**e, we saw discarded b****ts, we saw counters sent home because "they were done counting for the night", only to then witness b****ts pulled from under a table and fed into machines, we went to bed with Trump leading, then all of a sudden, right after count starting again , Biden ahead. You can say these things prove nothing but they at least prove we need to better manage v****g and counting sites.
archie bunker wrote:
Yep. He's a bonifide candidate for the rubber room.
Ever notice how when the red team was in charge, we lived in a representative republic, but when the blue team has the slimmest majority, it's majority rule?
Woody just posts garbage to try and rile people up. Then he scurries off
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.