Triple V******ted Defense Secretary Tests Positive For C****-**!!
So much for getting V******ted, only BIG PHARMA is making out.
U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin tested positive for C****-** on Sunday after experiencing symptoms at home while on leave.
The Department of Defense released a statement in which Austin noted that he is thankful his symptoms are mild due to being fully v******ted.
“My doctor made clear to me, my fully v******ted status — and the booster I received in early October — have rendered the infection much milder than it would otherwise have been,” Austin said in the statement.
The Defense Secretary stressed in the statement and in a series of tweets that his infection is not an indication that the v*****es are ineffective. If that is true, why is it that more have died V******ted than un-V******ted?
This is an airborne illness': Dr. Scott Gottlieb says cloth masks don't provide a lot of protection against C****-**, it only face decoration.
Capt-jack wrote:
Triple V******ted Defense Secretary Tests Positive For C****-**!!
So much for getting V******ted, only BIG PHARMA is making out.
U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin tested positive for C****-** on Sunday after experiencing symptoms at home while on leave.
The Department of Defense released a statement in which Austin noted that he is thankful his symptoms are mild due to being fully v******ted.
“My doctor made clear to me, my fully v******ted status — and the booster I received in early October — have rendered the infection much milder than it would otherwise have been,” Austin said in the statement.
The Defense Secretary stressed in the statement and in a series of tweets that his infection is not an indication that the v*****es are ineffective. If that is true, why is it that more have died V******ted than un-V******ted?
This is an airborne illness': Dr. Scott Gottlieb says cloth masks don't provide a lot of protection against C****-**, it only face decoration.
Triple V******ted Defense Secretary Tests Positive... (
show quote)
OK Capt-jack, I'll take a wild stab in the dark at that question. Because it's a death shot ???
Capt-jack wrote:
Triple V******ted Defense Secretary Tests Positive For C****-**!!
So much for getting V******ted, only BIG PHARMA is making out.
U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin tested positive for C****-** on Sunday after experiencing symptoms at home while on leave.
The Department of Defense released a statement in which Austin noted that he is thankful his symptoms are mild due to being fully v******ted.
“My doctor made clear to me, my fully v******ted status — and the booster I received in early October — have rendered the infection much milder than it would otherwise have been,” Austin said in the statement.
The Defense Secretary stressed in the statement and in a series of tweets that his infection is not an indication that the v*****es are ineffective. If that is true, why is it that more have died V******ted than un-V******ted?
This is an airborne illness': Dr. Scott Gottlieb says cloth masks don't provide a lot of protection against C****-**, it only face decoration.
Triple V******ted Defense Secretary Tests Positive... (
show quote)
Hey, Cap! How are you doing? Have a good Christmas? If you don't mind, where did you get the information that more jabbed have died than unjabbed? I have been trying to get those numbers, but I have not been able to find any government or credible medical claims that give those figures. It seems almost like they are being concealed.
Capt-jack wrote:
Triple V******ted Defense Secretary Tests Positive For C****-**!!
So much for getting V******ted, only BIG PHARMA is making out.
U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin tested positive for C****-** on Sunday after experiencing symptoms at home while on leave.
The Department of Defense released a statement in which Austin noted that he is thankful his symptoms are mild due to being fully v******ted.
“My doctor made clear to me, my fully v******ted status — and the booster I received in early October — have rendered the infection much milder than it would otherwise have been,” Austin said in the statement.
The Defense Secretary stressed in the statement and in a series of tweets that his infection is not an indication that the v*****es are ineffective. If that is true, why is it that more have died V******ted than un-V******ted?
This is an airborne illness': Dr. Scott Gottlieb says cloth masks don't provide a lot of protection against C****-**, it only face decoration.
Triple V******ted Defense Secretary Tests Positive... (
show quote)
Why are you asking such a ridiculous question, just do a Google search
RandyBrian wrote:
Hey, Cap! How are you doing? Have a good Christmas? If you don't mind, where did you get the information that more jabbed have died than unjabbed? I have been trying to get those numbers, but I have not been able to find any government or credible medical claims that give those figures. It seems almost like they are being concealed.
I did a google search. This article presents death rate facts in a simple to understand presentation. The conclusion is that death rates among unv******ted is much greater than death rates among v******ted. I could not find any evidence to dispute this claim.
https://ourworldindata.org/c***d-deaths-by-v******tion
DASHY wrote:
I did a google search. This article presents death rate facts in a simple to understand presentation. The conclusion is that death rates among unv******ted is much greater than death rates among v******ted. I could not find any evidence to dispute this claim.
https://ourworldindata.org/c***d-deaths-by-v******tionOf course you can't find the information to dispute this claim. It's all been censored and squashed.
Helloooo, anyone in there?
RandyBrian wrote:
Hey, Cap! How are you doing? Have a good Christmas? If you don't mind, where did you get the information that more jabbed have died than unjabbed? I have been trying to get those numbers, but I have not been able to find any government or credible medical claims that give those figures. It seems almost like they are being concealed.
Here is information about v*****e deaths only...this is as of December 15 to present:
https://www.medalerts.org/v***sdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=CAT&EVENTS=ON&VAX=C***D19Here is information about C***d deaths. (Scroll down for the interactive chart that shows daily deaths) I checked from December 14, which had 824,817 deaths to January 2, which had 849,408 deaths....with a difference of 22,591 Deaths.
https://www.worldometers.info/c****av***s/country/us/21,
So totals, V*****e deaths from December 15= 21,002 and deaths from Coved from December 14=22,591.
The numbers, given the dates, seem just about even according to these data, with a slight increase in C***d deaths. I suspect that since C***d has been around longer than the v*****es and its deaths are slightly higher than v*****e deaths now, that these numbers will increase exponentially over time, with C***d deaths eventually taking a clear lead over v*****e deaths.
EmilyD wrote:
Here is information about v*****e deaths only...this is as of December 15 to present:
https://www.medalerts.org/v***sdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=CAT&EVENTS=ON&VAX=C***D19Here is information about C***d deaths. (Scroll down for the interactive chart that shows daily deaths) I checked from December 14, which had 824,817 deaths to January 2, which had 849,408 deaths....with a difference of 22,591 Deaths.
https://www.worldometers.info/c****av***s/country/us/21,
So totals, V*****e deaths from December 15= 21,002 and deaths from Coved from December 14=22,591.
The numbers, given the dates, seem just about even according to these data, with a slight increase in C***d deaths. I suspect that since C***d has been around longer than the v*****es and its deaths are slightly higher than v*****e deaths now, that these numbers will increase exponentially over time, with C***d deaths eventually taking a clear lead over v*****e deaths.
Here is information about v*****e deaths only...th... (
show quote)
A report from an Indiana life insurance company raises serious concerns.
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/what-if-the-largest-experiment-on
skyrider wrote:
Of course you can't find the information to dispute this claim. It's all been censored and squashed.
Helloooo, anyone in there?
Where do you get your information to dispute this claim?
Things are starting to look like our government doesn't care HOW people die - either with or without being v******ted - but THAT they die. Now we have Omicron, which is highly t***smissible, yet mild. What's next? A highly t***smissible and fatal v***s?
Remember, Democrats thrive on chaos...the bigger the chaos the better for them to get away with c***ting, lying and sneaking around. This year we'd better watch our backs, closely. Things are going to get really unstable and chaotic as the year progresses, imo.
Do you think that a report by an Insurance Company about a possible increase in death rates might be intended to scare people into buying life insurance policies? If anything, it raises serious concerns about the ethics of the insurance company.
EmilyD wrote:
Things are starting to look like our government doesn't care HOW people die - either with or without being v******ted - but THAT they die. Now we have Omicron, which is highly t***smissible, yet mild. What's next? A highly t***smissible and fatal v***s?
Remember, Democrats thrive on chaos...the bigger the chaos the better for them to get away with c***ting, lying and sneaking around. This year we'd better watch our backs, closely. Things are going to get really unstable and chaotic as the year progresses, imo.
Things are starting to look like our government do... (
show quote)
Remember, Trump presided over one of the most chaotic administrations in American history.
https://freshairarchive.org/collections/trump-years
Capt-jack wrote:
Triple V******ted Defense Secretary Tests Positive For C****-**!!
The question is why you believe such a ridiculous thing? Getting C***d when you have been v******ted is a different prospect from getting it when you aren't.
woodguru wrote:
The question is why you believe such a ridiculous thing? Getting C***d when you have been v******ted is a different prospect from getting it when you aren't.
You say something as ridiculous as that and think people ever take you seriously? My God, Woodguru, that is right up there with the most inane thing thing you have ever said!! Wow!...amazing!
DASHY wrote:
Do you think that a report by an Insurance Company about a possible increase in death rates might be intended to scare people into buying life insurance policies? If anything, it raises serious concerns about the ethics of the insurance company.
There are plenty of underhanded sales tricks around, but I think calling that one of them, might be a real stretch.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.