Presently, Texas is suing the Federal government over their mandate restriction (in order to try and prevent the spread of all c***d v***ses), and YET, now after the wide spread in Texas, from almost 50% unv****d citizens, it's experiencing a large contamination rate and they would like Federal assistance. Well... well.. well, isn't that a shameful and embarrassing predicament.

Luckily there is a grownup in the room and instead of getting a slap down, they'll get their help. But lets look at this suit, does anyone else see the coincidence with the Red State of Texas's debt and their suit against the Biden Administration?

Presently, Texas is suing the Federal government over their mandate restriction (in order to try and prevent the spread of all c***d v***ses), and YET, now after the wide spread in Texas, from almost 50% unv****d citizens, it's experiencing a large contamination rate and they would like Federal assistance. Well... well.. well, isn't that a shameful and embarrassing predicament.

Luckily there is a grownup in the room and instead of getting a slap down, they'll get their help. But lets look at this suit, does anyone else see the coincidence with the Red State of Texas's debt and their suit against the Biden Administration?

Presently, Texas is suing the Federal government over their mandate restriction (in order to try and prevent the spread of all c***d v***ses), and YET, now after the wide spread in Texas, from almost 50% unv****d citizens, it's experiencing a large contamination rate and they would like Federal assistance. Well... well.. well, isn't that a shameful and embarrassing predicament.

Luckily there is a grownup in the room and instead of getting a slap down, they'll get their help. But lets look at this suit, does anyone else see the coincidence with the Red State of Texas's debt and their suit against the Biden Administration?

Presently, Texas is suing the Federal government over their mandate restriction (in order to try and prevent the spread of all c***d v***ses), and YET, now after the wide spread in Texas, from almost 50% unv****d citizens, it's experiencing a large contamination rate and they would like Federal assistance. Well... well.. well, isn't that a shameful and embarrassing predicament.

Luckily there is a grownup in the room and instead of getting a slap down, they'll get their help. But lets look at this suit, does anyone else see the coincidence with the Red State of Texas's debt and their suit against the Biden Administration?

If there is a grown up in that room it's not from anybody in the federal govt. Biden has been sneaking UNTESTED i*****l a***ns into this country via night flights. The feds have been spreading around thousands of infected i******s not just in Texas but all over the country. On top of that they have opened the borders to the drug cartels and are k*****g thousands of people. FJB has thousands of deaths on his soul. The lefties either have no ability to see what is happening or do not care. Explain coincidence between texas debt & suit against biden.

https://theconversation.com/no-v******ted-people-are-not-just-as-infectious-as-unv******ted-people-if-they-get-c***d-171302

No, v******ted people are not ‘just as infectious’ as unv******ted people if they get C***D
November 17, 2021 1.59pm EST

How concerned should we be? Are v******ted people just as contagious as unv******ted? What does this mean for future plans for reopening?

These studies only show a similar peak v***l load, which is the highest amount of v***s in the system over the course of the study.

But v******ted people clear the v***s faster, with lower levels of v***s overall, and have less time with very high levels of v***s present.

Therefore, v******ted people are, on average, likely to be less contagious.

Let us explain.

While the peak load may be similar, v******ted people are likely to have lower v***l load overall, and therefore be less contagious.

Given v*****es speed the clearance of C***D from the body, v******ted people have less opportunity to spread the v***s overall.

This appears to be the case even with the more infectious Delta variant.

We know being fully v******ted reduces the likelihood of catching C***D even if the v*****es aren’t perfect (none are) and there are breakthrough infections.

While it’s difficult to estimate the rate of breakthrough infections accurately, studies have estimated they occur in 0.2% to 4% of people. In reality, this means that for every 100 v******ted people, somewhere between 0.2 and 4 of them would get C***D.

So, while in the rare instance where a breakthrough infection occurs, there may be a similar v***l load, and possibly a similar infectiousness, there remain much fewer v******ted people getting C***D.

Do you all study courses in circular talk? Reminds me of a sales rep I had for pet food products, he was doing nothing as far as I could tell, so I refused to pay him. His argument was a piece of particularly moronic brilliance.
1. He hadn't done anything because I wasn't paying him
A. I asked why I owed him anything for a period of time he admitted he hadn't been doing anything because he hadn't been getting paid
2. He circled around to saying pay me for that period and I'll show you what I can do, I responded with show me what you can do and I'll pay you, but I am not paying anything for a period where you did nothing.

He kept arguing I owed him for this period of time when he had done nothing...I told him he could sue me but he was not going to get paid for a period when he hadn't done anything.

As this conversation evolved I told him I needed to see some tangible proof he had actually gotten my product placed in pet stores...he starts saying that that is somehow proprietary information, I told him that if he couldn't provide reports that showed whether he was doing his job he was utterly useless to me, I would depend on the regional distributors to do the job of getting it into pet stores.

Do you all study courses in circular talk? Reminds me of a sales rep I had for pet food products, he was doing nothing as far as I could tell, so I refused to pay him. His argument was a piece of particularly moronic brilliance.
1. He hadn't done anything because I wasn't paying him
A. I asked why I owed him anything for a period of time he admitted he hadn't been doing anything because he hadn't been getting paid
2. He circled around to saying pay me for that period and I'll show you what I can do, I responded with show me what you can do and I'll pay you, but I am not paying anything for a period where you did nothing.

He kept arguing I owed him for this period of time when he had done nothing...I told him he could sue me but he was not going to get paid for a period when he hadn't done anything.

As this conversation evolved I told him I needed to see some tangible proof he had actually gotten my product placed in pet stores...he starts saying that that is somehow proprietary information, I told him that if he couldn't provide reports that showed whether he was doing his job he was utterly useless to me, I would depend on the regional distributors to do the job of getting it into pet stores.