Regarding LIFE...
JW wrote:
It is not survivable.
True, living is a death sentence.
JW wrote:
It is not survivable.
So if I go to hell because I'm an evile Democrat I haven't survived life?
Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
PeterS wrote:
So if I go to hell because I'm an evile Democrat I haven't survived life?
No you'll go to hell because you haven't accepted Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior Pete.
Parky60 wrote:
No you'll go to hell because you haven't accepted Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior Pete.
Pety is a total, complete, phony, Parky. I asked him to answer a simple yes or no question, and have since
asked him 3 more times to answer. As expected , nothing.
Parky60 wrote:
No you'll go to hell because you haven't accepted Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior Pete.
If I haven't survived life how can I go to hell?
skyrider wrote:
Pety is a total, complete, phony, Parky. I asked him to answer a simple yes or no question, and have since
asked him 3 more times to answer. As expected , nothing.
Sorry Skyrider, I don't follow every threat I respond to. Repeat your question and I'll do my best to reply. If I don't PM me and remind me of the thread...
PeterS wrote:
Sorry Skyrider, I don't follow every threat I respond to. Repeat your question and I'll do my best to reply. If I don't PM me and remind me of the thread...
skyrider (topic starter rank #14) (online) Joined: Dec 16, 2020 Posts: 3867
PeterS wrote:
So if you get a v*****e how has Tyranny succeeded?
Succeeded because it would have forced me to do something that is likely dangerous to myself.
Here's a question for you that I want you to answer.
If an A.D. (airworthiness directive) was issued warning of wing spar cracks in a model of aircraft,
would you fly it before the flaw was corrected? Would you take your family with you?
Simple yes or no question.
Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
PeterS wrote:
If I haven't survived life how can I go to hell?
Hey Petey...news flash...there is eternal life after death. And you're either going to spend it with God or you ain't...your choice.
skyrider wrote:
skyrider (topic starter rank #14) (online) Joined: Dec 16, 2020 Posts: 3867
PeterS wrote:
So if you get a v*****e how has Tyranny succeeded?
Succeeded because it would have forced me to do something that is likely dangerous to myself.
Here's a question for you that I want you to answer.
If an A.D. (airworthiness directive) was issued warning of wing spar cracks in a model of aircraft,
would you fly it before the flaw was corrected? Would you take your family with you?
Simple yes or no question.
skyrider (topic starter rank #14) (online) Joined:... (
show quote)
No I wouldn't fly it so how does that relate to the C***d v*****e. Are there cracks in this model of aircraft? If so, where are they at?
PeterS wrote:
No I wouldn't fly it so how does that relate to the C***d v*****e. Are there cracks in this model of aircraft? If so, where are they at?
Not specifically at present. However they are detected from time to time and and all of the fleet of the same same one in question is immediately grounded. It is an analogy to the topic at hand.
In the past , a medical treatment that caused only 35 deaths out of millions was stopped immediately.
Why then, does the C***d vax, which is documented to have caused at minimum 40,000 deaths, but likely 10 times that, and millions of injuries continue to be used?
If you would not fly the plane because of the possibility of death or injury, why then would you take a vax, knowing the possible outcome could be death or injury. From my perspective, that indicates a complete lack of consistency
in evaluating risk. Looks to me like a thought process that is easily influenced and controlled by propaganda.
What say you?
Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
skyrider wrote:
Not specifically at present. However they are detected from time to time and and all of the fleet of the same same one in question is immediately grounded. It is an analogy to the topic at hand.
In the past , a medical treatment that caused only 35 deaths out of millions was stopped immediately.
Why then, does the C***d vax, which is documented to have caused at minimum 40,000 deaths, but likely 10 times that, and millions of injuries continue to be used?
If you would not fly the plane because of the possibility of death or injury, why then would you take a vax, knowing the possible outcome could be death or injury. From my perspective, that indicates a complete lack of consistency
in evaluating risk. Looks to me like a thought process that is easily influenced and controlled by propaganda.
What say you?
Not specifically at present. However they are dete... (
show quote)
I can't tell you the number of times that I've observed people like Pete, being l*****ts, being unable to understand analogies. They take everything literally. It's quite humorous at times.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.