Current cry.. (Page 3): You stated that this was Rittenhouse's first offense. My point is there was """" NO OFFENSE""""...

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

DASHY wrote:

This was the first time Rittenhouse was charged with murder after k*****g 2 men and injuring a third. He had not been charged with murder before this most recent incident. His self-defense claim set him free.

You stated that this was Rittenhouse's first offense.

My point is there was """" NO OFFENSE""""

DASHY

Michael Rich wrote:

You stated that this was Rittenhouse's first offense.

My point is there was """" NO OFFENSE""""

There was no murder conviction in the court of law. K*****g someone is certainly offensive. As a result of these offensive k*****gs, Rittenhouse was charged with 5 felonies. He was found not guilty by reason of self-defense on all charges.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

DASHY wrote:

There was no murder conviction in the court of law. K*****g someone is certainly offensive. As a result of these offensive k*****gs, Rittenhouse was charged with 5 felonies. He was found not guilty by reason of self-defense on all charges.

Then there was No Offense.

DASHY

nwtk2007 wrote:

Then there was No Offense.

I bet the three men who were shot by Rittenhouse found the shootings offensive. Only one lived to tell his story.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

DASHY wrote:

I bet the three men who were shot by Rittenhouse found the shootings offensive. Only one lived to tell his story.

Yes, his story about how he was about to shoot Rittenhouse.

But Rittenhouse committed NO offense. None.

DASHY

nwtk2007 wrote:

Yes, his story about how he was about to shoot Rittenhouse.

But Rittenhouse committed NO offense. None.

Only if you believe k*****g somebody is OK. Rittenhouse committed NO crime. I believe k*****g someone is a major offense against another person.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

DASHY wrote:

Only if you believe k*****g somebody is OK. Rittenhouse committed NO crime. I believe k*****g someone is a major offense against another person.

K*****g in self defense IS ok!

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

DASHY wrote:

There was no murder conviction in the court of law. K*****g someone is certainly offensive. As a result of these offensive k*****gs, Rittenhouse was charged with 5 felonies. He was found not guilty by reason of self-defense on all charges.

You don't possess the intellectual honesty to admit you were mistaken?

Rehashing the charges in no way causes Rittenhouse to be guilty of any offense.

"K*****g someone is certainly "offensive"?

K*****g and Murder are two different animals.

If it's self defense, there is no offense.

DASHY

Michael Rich wrote:

You don't possess the intellectual honesty to admit you were mistaken?

Rehashing the charges in no way causes Rittenhouse to be guilty of any offense.

"K*****g someone is certainly "offensive"?

K*****g and Murder are two different animals.

If it's self defense, there is no offense.

The self defense claim for k*****g someone is what convinced a 12-member jury, after 4 days of deliberations, to find the defendant NOT GUILTY of the federal offense of murder. Am I mistaken that two people are dead and a third person injured as a result of Rittenhouse shooting his semi-automatic rifle in their direction?

America 1 Loc: South Miami

DASHY wrote:

I bet the three men who were shot by Rittenhouse found the shootings offensive. Only one lived to tell his story.

It is simple, k**l or be k**led.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

DASHY wrote:

The self defense claim for k*****g someone is what convinced a 12-member jury, after 4 days of deliberations, to find the defendant NOT GUILTY of the federal offense of murder. Am I mistaken that two people are dead and a third person injured as a result of Rittenhouse shooting his semi-automatic rifle in their direction?

Are you a bot?

DASHY

America 1 wrote:

It is simple, k**l or be k**led.

K*****g another human being, even in self defense, should never be thought of as simple. K*****g should be used as a last resort not a "simple" response to a dangerous situation.

America 1 Loc: South Miami

DASHY wrote:

K*****g another human being, even in self-defense, should never be thought of as simple. K*****g should be used as a last resort not a "simple" response to a dangerous situation.

The decision is simple, not the act, k**l or be k**led.
Using your method in this case, you would not be here to debate the issue.
Twist, spin, and turn all you want.
The outcome is simply you are dead.

DASHY

Michael Rich wrote:

You don't possess the intellectual honesty to admit you were mistaken?

Rehashing the charges in no way causes Rittenhouse to be guilty of any offense.

"K*****g someone is certainly "offensive"?

K*****g and Murder are two different animals.

If it's self defense, there is no offense.

If a person is found not guilty of murder in a court of law, is the victim still dead?

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

DASHY wrote:

If a person is found not guilty of murder in a court of law, is the victim still dead?

They were NOT victims!!