It is getting harder and harder for the l*****ts goofs to defend their position (Page 4): A 6 year old would have figured it out concerning the pull out.Just the reverse of what he...

markinny

A 6 year old would have figured it out concerning the pull out.Just the reverse of what he did. SHAME ON THIS INEPT, DELUSIONAL OLD FOOL. The left will be crushed at the polls next year. congress will be ours! when you have no common sense like the left, your days are numbered. C,M,ON MAN.

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

drlarrygino wrote:

Coos you are full of more doodo than Slo Pedo Joe's underwear. The only thing you researched was Debbie Does Dallas and you were left out.

Yep you are one burning mass of mature intelligence

Carol Kelly

lpnmajor wrote:

Something they learned from the goofballs on the right.

I beg you pardon.

Big Kahuna

Coos Bay Tom wrote:

Yep you are one burning mass of mature intelligence

Thanks Coos.

grandaddyw Loc: FLORIDA

how about gas prices and putting thousands of workers out of work.illegal coming into our country. This will change the country with drugs and everything that goes with it. We might be in war soon.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Linzo wrote:

Well what do you call it when women get paid less for doing the same job for example? I call that social discrimination and definitely an injustice. If believing equal pay for equal work makes me a progressive, then I am proud to be a progressive. If you don’t believe in equal pay then I believe you are living in the past and need to catch up with the progressive society.

Women don’t make less when dollars per hour are considered. Such a B.S. argument.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/no-women-dont-make-less-money-than-men

microphor Loc: Home is TN

JFlorio wrote:

Women don’t make less when dollars per hour are considered. Such a B.S. argument.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/no-women-dont-make-less-money-than-men

In the past, that was true, not anymore. First hand experience on the topic. That's not to say there are not bias people out there who might try to get away with paying less to one sex over the other. It's not legal and the repercussions include retro pay.

federally indicted mattoid

Coos Bay Tom wrote:

Yep you are one burning mass of mature intelligence

Lol, Tom

I thought it.... but decided to never engage the child.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

useful mattoid 45 wrote:

Lol, Tom

I thought it.... but decided to never engage the child.

Good thing. That child would kick your butt.

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

useful mattoid 45 wrote:

Lol, Tom

I thought it.... but decided to never engage the child.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

microphor wrote:

In the past, that was true, not anymore. First hand experience on the topic. That's not to say there are not bias people out there who might try to get away with paying less to one sex over the other. It's not legal and the repercussions include retro pay.

I have been working since 1973 in various places in south Texas. In ALL that time, the ONLY place I have heard of women being paid less than men is in managerial jobs where each individual negotiates his own pay with his boss. And THAT was only in movies and TV and in the occasional news article. I have NEVER seen it happen in person.
That, of course, does not prove it did not happen in the past, nor that it is not going on somewhere, but it is illegal, and I tend to suspect it happens mostly in 'woke' companies in blue cities.
A couple of decades ago this was a hot button issue, and I did some research. I can't speak for today, but at that time the supposed 'lower pay' for women was a lie. It was based on adding up the number of working men and their combined salaries, and comparing it to the number of working women and THEIR combined salaries. Statistical nonsense, since women in general CHOOSE to work part time jobs or to be employed in lower paying positions more than men do. At the time, at least, there was no significant number of situations where men and women working comparable jobs were making different amounts of money and benefits.

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

working class stiff wrote:

That's not how it works....the accusation of a crime is made by you (something was 'stolen'), the burden of proof is on you. Let's see the evidence.

Your childish 'I'm rubber , you're glue....' response tells me you have nothing. You see, it is pretty easy for me to defend my position.

No single court would take up the vast evidence usually with phony excuses. The evidence is there and slowly coming out. Racine County in Wisconsin just indicted 5 out of 6 people on their state e******n commission with felony charges. They investigated it at the County Sheriff level and are moving forward. It is a slow process. But it was fraud and of that, there is no doubt. Just one example.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

LogicallyRight wrote:

No single court would take up the vast evidence usually with phony excuses. The evidence is there and slowly coming out. Racine County in Wisconsin just indicted 5 out of 6 people on their state e******n commission with felony charges. They investigated it at the County Sheriff level and are moving forward. It is a slow process. But it was fraud and of that, there is no doubt. Just one example.

What i***t lemming progressives don’t get, or won’t admit is fraud is seldom prosecuted. Couple reasons: Often times, the side being accused of fraud is the side in power. Their Justice Department is not interested. Also, prosecutors like a big splash. Most are political whores and like cases already tied up with a big bow on them. Fraud is hard to prove and not very exciting.

working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina

LogicallyRight wrote:

No single court would take up the vast evidence usually with phony excuses. The evidence is there and slowly coming out. Racine County in Wisconsin just indicted 5 out of 6 people on their state e******n commission with felony charges. They investigated it at the County Sheriff level and are moving forward. It is a slow process. But it was fraud and of that, there is no doubt. Just one example.

No single court? There were over 60 suits brought and all of them dismissed, including by judges appointed by Trump himself. His own DHS and DOJ said these were fair and honest e******n.

The Racine indictments are about family members questioning why their elderly relatives in long term care facilities were allowed to v**e. Just another red herring. Pathetic.

working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina

JFlorio wrote:

What i***t lemming progressives don’t get, or won’t admit is fraud is seldom prosecuted. Couple reasons: Often times, the side being accused of fraud is the side in power. Their Justice Department is not interested. Also, prosecutors like a big splash. Most are political whores and like cases already tied up with a big bow on them. Fraud is hard to prove and not very exciting.

What a sad and pathetic troll you've become.