Did you know....?
Nov 22, 2021 07:30:47 #
that pharmaceutical companies spend more on MARKETING their drugs, than they do on the RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT of those drugs?
If that alone was not a concern, how about the whistleblower, Brook Jackson report on the P****r v*****e Safety Integrity Trial? https://noqreport.com/2021/11/15/in-depth-p****r-whistleblower-sinks-v*****e-trial-integrity/
So, let me recap. The V*****e Companies spend more on Marketing than R&D, they get an extraordinary product liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act, they have a proven track record of fraud, manipulation and suppression of safety study data*, and the supposed government watchdogs# over these "pinnacles of virtue" are themselves, captured and paid off by the very industry that they are supposed to regulate. Doesn't that just want to make you run out and immediately get your BOOSTER shot? to keep up your supply of "spike proteins"?
* P****r and Johnson & Johnson plead guilty to “misbranding with the intent to defraud or mislead” and paying “kickbacks to health care providers to induce them to prescribe [their] drugs,” resulting in fines of $2.3 billion in 2009 and $2.2 billion in 2013, respectively.
* P****r settled another lawsuit for “manipulating studies” and “suppressing negative findings” just a few years later.
...................
# The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) worked behind the scenes with company Biogen to alter previously conducted trials of their $56,000 per year Alzheimer’s treatment, and “by removing the subset of people for whom the drug didn’t work, they found a slight statistical effect in favor of the drug.” Even after doing this, an advisory committee v**ed 10–0 against approving the drug. The FDA approved the drug anyway, causing three committee members to resign.
# In that case, the third-party advisors did the right thing. This is not always the case: a study by Science Magazine tracking 107 FDA advisors for four years found that 62 percent received money from related drug makers, with 25 percent receiving over $100,000 and 6 percent receiving over $1 million. It only takes a few corrupt advisors to fix a panel and feign medical consensus.
# In 2017, it was revealed that the acting Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director for heart disease and stroke prevention had been secretly communicating with Coca-Cola, providing guidance on how “to influence world health authorities on sugar and beverage policy matters.”
If that alone was not a concern, how about the whistleblower, Brook Jackson report on the P****r v*****e Safety Integrity Trial? https://noqreport.com/2021/11/15/in-depth-p****r-whistleblower-sinks-v*****e-trial-integrity/
So, let me recap. The V*****e Companies spend more on Marketing than R&D, they get an extraordinary product liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act, they have a proven track record of fraud, manipulation and suppression of safety study data*, and the supposed government watchdogs# over these "pinnacles of virtue" are themselves, captured and paid off by the very industry that they are supposed to regulate. Doesn't that just want to make you run out and immediately get your BOOSTER shot? to keep up your supply of "spike proteins"?
* P****r and Johnson & Johnson plead guilty to “misbranding with the intent to defraud or mislead” and paying “kickbacks to health care providers to induce them to prescribe [their] drugs,” resulting in fines of $2.3 billion in 2009 and $2.2 billion in 2013, respectively.
* P****r settled another lawsuit for “manipulating studies” and “suppressing negative findings” just a few years later.
...................
# The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) worked behind the scenes with company Biogen to alter previously conducted trials of their $56,000 per year Alzheimer’s treatment, and “by removing the subset of people for whom the drug didn’t work, they found a slight statistical effect in favor of the drug.” Even after doing this, an advisory committee v**ed 10–0 against approving the drug. The FDA approved the drug anyway, causing three committee members to resign.
# In that case, the third-party advisors did the right thing. This is not always the case: a study by Science Magazine tracking 107 FDA advisors for four years found that 62 percent received money from related drug makers, with 25 percent receiving over $100,000 and 6 percent receiving over $1 million. It only takes a few corrupt advisors to fix a panel and feign medical consensus.
# In 2017, it was revealed that the acting Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director for heart disease and stroke prevention had been secretly communicating with Coca-Cola, providing guidance on how “to influence world health authorities on sugar and beverage policy matters.”
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.