JW

<<<"The document contains information on C****-** cases, hospitalizations and deaths in England between Aug. 23 and Sept 19, 2021.

Indeed, of 1,521 over-80s who died from C****-** during this time, 1,272 were fully v******ted, the data shows. Forty-three had received one v*****e dose, while 198 were unv******ted. Meanwhile, 607 out of 801 70 to 79-year-olds who died from C****-** had received two v*****e doses (164 hadn’t been v******ted) and of 411 fully v******ted 60- to 69-year-olds, 258 were fully v******ted (125 were unv******ted).

However, the numbers alone miss the context necessary to understand the impact of C****-** v*****es. This data does not show that people who are fully v******ted against C****-** are more likely to die from the v***s.

When much of a population has been v******ted, most infections and deaths are “expected to be among those v******ted”, Dr Muge Cevik, a clinical lecturer in infectious diseases and medical v******y at the University of St Andrews, previously told Reuters.">>>


RE the highlighted: What he is actually saying is that the "v*****e" has no effect on the disease. If the "v******ted" continue to get sick and die then what is the point of the "v*****e".