Retired669

He's fun to mess with and he doesn't seem to be a frickin lunatic like many of the others.. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Airforceone

Ya your right and he is amusing. I have been working for. 2 weeks digging out all the so called Job creation bills passed by the GOP in the house and being blocked in the Senate. I will be posting in a few days. These TP folks are going to k**l me but these are the bills.

RETW Loc: Washington

Well son, let me see if I can enlighten your bad, on a few points.

1. Now I don’t know what war you were in, nor do I care, except to say thank you for your service. 20 years is a long time, and I am sure you did a fine job. But do not for one moment think that you are the only one that was. I became real intimate with the earth in North Korea. And have witnessed many of my friends die, lose legs, arms faces and worse. I know full well the horrors of war. So lets act like men shall we. Because if you can not do that, you do have a problem.

I never said, nor did I for even one second believe what I posted, would be taken as a complaint. It was not intended to be. It was a statement of fact. These are some of the things you have to accept as responsibility
when running or owning a business. It goes with the territory. It was to me an honor and a privilege to do so.

2. So again I ask you. What part of taking someone’s money away from them is right?

Perhaps this is not the country you want

3. If it is a socialist country you want. By all means go to China. If it’s a dictator ship you crave, you might want to try Cuba or Russia. If it is religious zealots that turns you on, by all means try Iran or one of the many countries over there that are into that life.

You said in your post you have never had to make payroll, nor have you ever had a small or large business.
So why is it, you feel compelled to comment on the workings of someone that has. You see, unbridled passion, bespeaks of stupidity. Now I for one moment don’t think that of you, but on the other hand. One never knows does one?

Have a good day

RETW

VladimirPee

N**i? Not me son. They were economic liberals.

Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas

They were jingoistic, Tea Party nationalist r****ts.

VladimirPee

Tea Party isn't r****t at all. If anything the goon in the White House has displayed more r****m in the past few weeks than anyone in a TP. N**i's were populists and used class warfare just like todays Dems. The embraced National Healthcare, Mandated pensions, Rent control, Forced Profit Sharing, Bans on War profits. In fact on issues other than nationalism and immigration the N**i Platform was a l*****t document

Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas

Not true, there are individuals who attend Tea Party rallies and openly display the Confederate F**g. Birthers further the "lie" that Obama was born in Kenya, a r****t sentiment, to be sure. N**is promoted the notion of a "Superior Race". You're a N**i, face it. Oh, did I mention that they were jingoists, what better way to describe "Right Wing" nuts?

VladimirPee

Birthers are not TP In fact the birther movement was started by a Hillary Supporter. Philip Berg a Lawyer from Philly.

Nobody in the Tea Party is promoting N**i ideals and you know it

Lets face it. You are a moron who gets his ass kicked in every debate on facts so you have no choice but to resort to this idiocy

Retired669

I've seen the number of bills anywhere from 40 to 390 passed by the congress waiting in the senate around these boards the past several weeks. Not long ago I checked one of the links provided by the wing nut and the first three bills amounted to nothing but less regulation and tax cuts and you guessed it the defunding of the ACA itself. I quit after that since it was useless. I'm closer to the lower number of bills passed seeing how lazy the congress is and damn are they lazy. These people don't believe anything that doesn't fall inside their ideology so what you're doing is great but probably a waste of time as far as getting them to listen much less understand.. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

VladimirPee

Retired I guess you didn't look close enough. But even if those bills are partisan bills you seem to agree with obstruction based on ideology.

Retired669

I agree to throw in the trash can any bill that try's to defund the ACA 3D. Reid is still waiting on all those jobs bills the cons ran on before the 2010 e******ns. They seem to have got lost on the way to the senate. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Airforceone

Typical over dramatization of facts. I owed my own business and never had any problems.

Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas

It sure sounded like whining, to me. I thank you for your service. I too don't care which war you were in, but by your post it seems apparent you were in the Korean War.

Now I've seen this argument many times...

"So why is it, you feel compelled to comment on the workings of someone that has."

I don't have to have been in every situation to have a say about something. You're the one that decided to lay out all the hardships, of being a business owner. Why did you feel the need to tell me about it? Let's see exactly why you decided to share something, with me, that according to you, I "don’t have a clue" of what I'm talking about. Here's your diatribe...


"No longer do I have to spend 12,14,16
hour days working. Or the many weeks on end, I spent at the job 7 days a week,
making sure my employees got paid instead of me. No more do have to worry about the health of those very same employees, or there families. No more do I have to wonder and plan for, what new and inventive ways the EPA, or OSHA, or the DOTP, city planers, the water regulation board, county, state, or federal
Agencies will put in the way of business, just so I can pay those very same employees. How very nice of you to say that.
I do suspect you don’t have a clue just what the hell I'm talking about.
So please enlighten me as to what part of taking some ones money from them they did not earn, is in anyway right?"


Sounds like a little bitterness, to me. I can only surmise you're trying to tell me just how terrible you had it. Something I pointed out in my previous post. So why don't you take the guess work out of why you posted that whine, instead of me guessing. Because if I'm guessing, I guess you're whining.

It seems to me that your biggest whine is about paying taxes. I guess that is what you're talking about when you say...

"So please enlighten me as to what part of taking some ones money from them they did not earn, is in anyway right."

You make little childish statements like..." So lets act like men shall we". By all means, quit your whining and we'll all "act like men". And the "man" I know you are knows full well "taxes" have been around longer than you and I have been alive. So quit whining about taxes. Now if you're whining about something else, please enlighten me as to what exactly you mean by..."taking some ones money from them they did not earn..."

Let's speak frankly all you seem to do is whine about the government, at least from what I've read. You claim it is "Socialistic". That whine is extremely old and false. And used by many, many Conservatives, because they think it gives them sort of advantage, in a debate. Actually it makes them look ignorant. Are some government programs socialistic, in nature, yes. Obviously Social Security, Medicare and now the ACA. But does that make our economic system "Socialistic", in nature? No. Our economic system is Capitalistic in nature and we have a "Free Market" economy. And so far, our posts have been about business, which falls under the economic category. So clean your act up, define what you're talking about and don't confuse the fact that government programs are "Socialistic", in nature, with the fact we live with a Capitalistic economy.

Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas

From everything I see, it is you that is the moron. When you refuse to accept facts.

Also, You're big on that "gets his ass kicked in every debate..." argument, aren't you? You definitely suffer from an inferiority complex. I suspect most of you insecure little "Cons" are trying in some desperate way to make yourselves look big. What is that "get your ass kicked", in every debate", small man argument about, anyways? Does it bother you that you are associated with N**iism? Face it you're a little man with visions of grandeur. TweedleDennisDee don't tell me that your avatar is actually a picture of you? I should have known.

And I'll bet that a majority of Tea Party members are "Birthers". And I'll take your word for who started the "Birther" nonsense, although no one really gives a sh1t. But what exactly are you trying to say, when you say that the i***t that began the rumor is, was or will be a Hillary supporter? Does that mean something? Is there some significance to that statement? Or is it like so many of your other statements, meaningless?

VladimirPee

Bruce

You have not won an issue on any subject with me EVER. There are a combination of reasons behind this. First is your flawed ideology and second is your lack of intelligence. You just aren't very smart as I have proven time and time again. You are a parrot who repeats talking points and when challenged you are incapable of defending them so you revert to your talking points. I have dealt with clowns like you in political chat for 18 years and you are by far one of the dumbest.


The Birther movement was started by a Democrat
Philip Jay Berg (born April 13, 1944) is an American attorney who brought a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) lawsuit charging president George W. Bush and 154 others with complicity in the 9/11 attacks, and another suit challenging the eligibility of Barack Obama to become President of the United States.

Berg, whose office is in Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania, is a former chairman of the Democratic Party of Montgomery County, in suburban Philadelphia and a former member of the Democrat State Committee. He is a paid life member of the NAACP.

He is a former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania.

On June 19, 2013, Berg's license to practice law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania was suspended for two years.