One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
This would fix the government of these United States nicely, if we followed this constitutional law..
Page <prev 2 of 13 next> last>>
Oct 26, 2021 14:45:52   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
permafrost wrote:
What is Section 3 of the 14th Amendment?
Ratified in the aftermath of the Civil War, Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly disqualifies any person from public office who, having previously taken an oath as a federal or state office holder, engaged in i**********n or r*******n.Feb 26, 2021

February 26, 2021 Press Release

WASHINGTON – Congressman Steve Cohen (TN-09), the Chairman of the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties, today introduced a measure to enforce Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibiting those who have engaged in i**********n or r*******n against the United States from holding public office.

Ratified in the aftermath of the Civil War, Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly disqualifies any person from public office who, having previously taken an oath as a federal or state office holder, engaged in i**********n or r*******n. This disability can only be removed by a two-thirds v**e of each House of Congress. Having lived through that violent r*******n, the framers of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment were concerned that office holders who had engaged in i**********n might again serve in the very State and Federal governments they had previously sought to violently o*******w.

Congressman Cohen made the following statement:

“The J****** 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol demonstrates that the concerns that prompted ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment remain relevant today. On that day, a mob violently stormed the United States Capitol in an attempt to impede the constitutional function of our democracy and overturn the 2020 e******n results. This was the first time the Capitol had been invaded since the War of 1812. It is important that we enforce the constitutional provision establishing that any office holders who violated their oaths of office and engaged in this i**********n cannot be trusted with public office.”

The legislation introduced today would create a modern mechanism to enforce this section of the Constitution through a cause of action for the Attorney General before a three-judge panel. Should the Attorney General prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that an officeholder or former officeholder engaged in i**********n or r*******n, that individual would be disqualified from holding public office.

Also under this legislation, disqualified individuals would forfeit any benefits derived from their service in federal office and would be prohibited from obtaining contracts with the federal government. The bill also amends the Former Presidents Act so that an individual disqualified under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to this legislation would not be considered a “former President” for the purpose of receiving benefits under the Act.
What is Section 3 of the 14th Amendment? br Ratifi... (show quote)
Corruption in our federal government is astronomical, it is epic, Biblical, it is so far removed from the principles of our founding that our Constitution isn't even recognizable.

And, you think focusing on an incident that occurred on one day in our nation's history and using that as an excuse to throw a few senators and reps out of congress is gonna fix the government?

Get freaking real, will ya?

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 14:48:37   #
The Ms.
 
permafrost wrote:
stated in the Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3: No Person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or e*****r of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in i**********n or r*******n against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a v**e of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

If the J****** 6 Commission finds any elected Official guilty, they should be out.
stated in the Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3: No ... (show quote)


Nice try! NOT!!!!!

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 14:49:48   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
proud republican wrote:
She was UNARMED!!!!!!!!


She was a t*****r and an I**********nist, and a s******nist .
Unarmed is the least of it. She was told to cease and desist , she was warned,
And continued. If she could have gotten in and opened the doors, tell me how that might have turned out ?
Do you think because she was unarmed they should’ve, invited her in for tea and biscuits ?????

Reply
 
 
Oct 26, 2021 14:53:03   #
WinkyTink Loc: Hill Country, TX
 
proud republican wrote:
She was UNARMED!!!!!!!!


These clowns are fun to trigger.

I get titillated thinking about them distraught and mired in h**e for the right while having to endure the governance of the current, short lived, administration.

Let's go Brandon!
MAGA!

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 14:53:46   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Milosia2 wrote:
She was a t*****r and an I**********nist, and a s******nist .
Unarmed is the least of it. She was told to cease and desist , she was warned,
And continued. If she could have gotten in and opened the doors, tell me how that might have turned out ?
Do you think because she was unarmed they should’ve, invited her in for tea and biscuits ?????



Reply
Oct 26, 2021 14:54:31   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Milosia2 wrote:
She was a t*****r and an I**********nist, and a s******nist .
Unarmed is the least of it. She was told to cease and desist , she was warned,
And continued. If she could have gotten in and opened the doors, tell me how that might have turned out ?
Do you think because she was unarmed they should’ve, invited her in for tea and biscuits ?????


She was not warned, she had no chance, she was going through the window when she was shot...Yes, she made a mistake!! But she did not deserve to die like that!!! PERIOD!

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 14:56:23   #
WinkyTink Loc: Hill Country, TX
 
proud republican wrote:
She was not warned, she had no chance, she was going through the window when she was shot...Yes, she made a mistake!! But she did not deserve to die like that!!! PERIOD!


At the hands of a keystone kop coward, no less.

Reply
 
 
Oct 26, 2021 14:59:22   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
wtroxell wrote:
At the hands of a keystone kop coward, no less.


Who btw left his gun unattended in the bathroom..

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 15:02:09   #
MajG
 
permafrost wrote:
stated in the Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3: No Person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or e*****r of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in i**********n or r*******n against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a v**e of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

If the J****** 6 Commission finds any elected Official guilty, they should be out.
stated in the Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3: No ... (show quote)



Perfect.
General Milley the poster boy for paragraph One. We can shoot Peelousy too.
Then down the list to the last minute illegal e******n rule changes at state level.

Thanks for the post!

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 15:07:03   #
MajG
 
proud republican wrote:
She was not warned, she had no chance, she was going through the window when she was shot...Yes, she made a mistake!! But she did not deserve to die like that!!! PERIOD!


These frightened whining children may sing a different tune if it was their Mom or Sis or Child.
It was clear to all:

A Coward plastic cop in ambush murdered a defenseless girl.
Next...Capital punishment for shoplifters if you are Pro Trump. Noose, Bullet or Electric Chair? You don't need to actually do anything.

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 15:09:59   #
MajG
 
proud republican wrote:
Are these uh our people, permy???LET'S GO BRANDON!! 😀😁😁


He's got a ManCrush on Trump. Can't discuss a thing with out bringing in the Golden sweetie of his dreams.

Reply
 
 
Oct 26, 2021 15:14:35   #
MajG
 
Milosia2 wrote:
She was a t*****r and an I**********nist, and a s******nist .
Unarmed is the least of it. She was told to cease and desist , she was warned,
And continued. If she could have gotten in and opened the doors, tell me how that might have turned out ?
Do you think because she was unarmed they should’ve, invited her in for tea and biscuits ?????


Here he is folks- The Frightened child.
Makes up stories out of cowardly fear.
Even with 100 lb advantage and her on the other side of the door Coward-Cop couldn't resist a free shot at murder. His supports are of the same mamby pamby mousy countenance, Safe in Mommies basement.

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 15:33:06   #
The Ms.
 
Milosia2 wrote:
She was a t*****r and an I**********nist, and a s******nist .
Unarmed is the least of it. She was told to cease and desist , she was warned,
And continued. If she could have gotten in and opened the doors, tell me how that might have turned out ?
Do you think because she was unarmed they should’ve, invited her in for tea and biscuits ?????


And would you be of the same mindset if she was Black????

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 15:35:47   #
WinkyTink Loc: Hill Country, TX
 
MajG wrote:
Perfect.
General Milley the poster boy for paragraph One. We can shoot Peelousy too.
Then down the list to the last minute illegal e******n rule changes at state level.

Thanks for the post!


Good clear thinking and response!

Reply
Oct 26, 2021 15:39:26   #
American Vet
 
permafrost wrote:
Not a lie in the bunch... .


Really?

The why haven't you posted where I made that comment?
"you also think the very rich do not need to pay tax"
Of course, you could provide some post/evidence/proof I said that or just remain a proven liar.

Then why haven't you posted where President Trump's father was convicted of 'defrauding the government?
"I did not mean to say daddy trump worked for the government.. he used the federal financing to build housing, the defrauded the govt."
Got anything to back up that blatant lie, permy?

And why haven't you posted the proof that he was murdered?
"permafrost wrote:
But none the less a casualty of the i**********n at the capital of our nation on J** 6th 2021.. making his death a murder by the attacking mob.."
And another lie.

I can answer why you haven't: Because you have no proof/data/evidence. You just have diarrhea of the mouth (or keyboard in this case) and spew forth lies. You are pathetic......

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.