JFlorio wrote:
True. I***t progressives would rather blame Trump than China. Wonder if they blame Baldwin and not the guy in charge of the prop gun?
Given that it's Alec Baldwin, they should!!
JFlorio wrote:
70% of those catching C***d in the U.K. Are fully v******ted. Biden .F***i, and the i***ts at the CDC have screwed up the messaging so bad that many don’t trust them. Natural immunity is showing that it has significantly more antibodies than v*****es. Why are you and your ilk ignoring the science? Aren’t there many more v******ted now than under Trump? Then why more deaths? Especially now that we know the v******ted can infect others. Might as well lock your miserable self in your basement with your mask on. You can’t avoid this stuff.
70% of those catching C***d in the U.K. Are fully ... (
show quote)
What a load, unless you can prove such an outrageous claim. Also be specific are your referring to now catching the new Delta version, then yeah that's fully possible that they caught it, and how many died that caught it? What a misleading statement. No one is denying your own immunities may produce more when you catch the v***s. We're ignoring the science, LOL you have got to be kidding me on who's ignoring the science.
The deaths are with 99% of unv******ted, we also have most of the public no longer wearing masks! So the vulnerable unv******ted WILL GET SICK. I can go out all over the place without a mask, wherever I'm aloud, I'm v******ted. I even flew, I'm still good. I'm not the one who needs to hide in a basement with a mask, you are, IF you haven't been v******ted and are afraid you can lock your miserable self up. I'm good with that too!
Cuda2020 wrote:
What a load, unless you can prove such an outrageous claim. Also be specific are your referring to now catching the new Delta version, then yeah that's fully possible that they caught it, and how many died that caught it? What a misleading statement. No one is denying your own immunities may produce more when you catch the v***s. We're ignoring the science, LOL you have got to be kidding me on who's ignoring the science.
The deaths are with 99% of unv******ted, we also have most of the public no longer wearing masks! So the vulnerable unv******ted WILL GET SICK. I can go out all over the place without a mask, wherever I'm aloud, I'm v******ted. I even flew, I'm still good. I'm not the one who needs to hide in a basement with a mask, you are, IF you haven't been v******ted and are afraid you can lock your miserable self up. I'm good with that too!
What a load, unless you can prove such an outrageo... (
show quote)
If that is true Cuda, why do v******ted people need protection from unv******ted people??
Cuda2020 wrote:
What a load, unless you can prove such an outrageous claim. Also be specific are your referring to now catching the new Delta version, then yeah that's fully possible that they caught it, and how many died that caught it? What a misleading statement. No one is denying your own immunities may produce more when you catch the v***s. We're ignoring the science, LOL you have got to be kidding me on who's ignoring the science.
The deaths are with 99% of unv******ted, we also have most of the public no longer wearing masks! So the vulnerable unv******ted WILL GET SICK. I can go out all over the place without a mask, wherever I'm aloud, I'm v******ted. I even flew, I'm still good. I'm not the one who needs to hide in a basement with a mask, you are, IF you haven't been v******ted and are afraid you can lock your miserable self up. I'm good with that too!
What a load, unless you can prove such an outrageo... (
show quote)
None of what I wrote is a load as you do what you always do. Can't debate so you go on a tangent. Look it up. the stats I gave are from the U.K.. If no one is denying natural immunity then why is the Biden administration ignoring it in their mandates? That is ignoring the science. Demanding children wear masks because of C***d that is statistically not a problem for children is not following the science. More children die from the flu than from c***d. Why aren't children mandated to wear masks to avoid the flu? Again, not following the science. Lock downs do not work. Even the i***t progressives know that, yet democrats still pursue them. Again, not following the science. show me a link to the 99% of deaths. I actually do not doubt that number. However; if true, why do you worry about the unv******ted?
JFlorio wrote:
None of what I wrote is a load as you do what you always do. Can't debate so you go on a tangent. Look it up. the stats I gave are from the U.K.. If no one is denying natural immunity then why is the Biden administration ignoring it in their mandates? That is ignoring the science. Demanding children wear masks because of C***d that is statistically not a problem for children is not following the science. More children die from the flu than from c***d. Why aren't children mandated to wear masks to avoid the flu? Again, not following the science. Lock downs do not work. Even the i***t progressives know that, yet democrats still pursue them. Again, not following the science. show me a link to the 99% of deaths. I actually do not doubt that number. However; if true, why do you worry about the unv******ted?
None of what I wrote is a load as you do what you ... (
show quote)
Florio, you are pissing into the wind.
Cuda2020 wrote:
What of it?
Can someone post links to adverse side effects to the jab!!!
Doing stupid…. Posting from CDC on adverse effects when CDC are are the ones pushing the death jab!!!! I have to give you credit…. You do dummy down very well!!!!
The Ms. wrote:
Can someone post links to adverse side effects to the jab!!!
Doing stupid…. Posting from CDC on adverse effects when CDC are are the ones pushing the death jab!!!! I have to give you credit…. You do dummy down very well!!!!
She is a typical progressive. If the information coming from the CDC or any other alphabet agency comes forth while her preferred party is in power then what they say cannot be questioned and is sacrosanct. She follows their mandates and conclusions like a good little lemming. However; if the same information comes out of those exact same agencies while her preferred party is not in power then everything they say should be discounted or ignored. Even if it is the same information.
JFlorio wrote:
She is a typical progressive. If the information coming from the CDC or any other alphabet agency comes forth while her preferred party is in power then what they say cannot be questioned and is sacrosanct. She follows their mandates and conclusions like a good little lemming. However; if the same information comes out of those exact same agencies while her preferred party is not in power then everything they say should be discounted or ignored. Even if it is the same information.
Good definition of a Progressive left Wing-Nut🍷🍷🍷
nwtk2007 wrote:
If that is true Cuda, why do v******ted people need protection from unv******ted people??
They don’t, unless they have a c*********d i****e s****m.
Cuda2020 wrote:
They don’t, unless they have a c*********d i****e s****m.
So why so they need to be protected from the unv******ted?? And given that both v******ted and unv******ted carry the same v***l load and are equally contagious if exposed, again, why do they say they need to be protected from the unv******ted????
The answer is power over people, pure and simple. That and pure politics!!
Cuda2020 wrote:
It’s an outlandish lie.
That is your typical debate answer. Loser.
Cuda2020 wrote:
They don’t, unless they have a c*********d i****e s****m.
Of course! According to Doc Corvair…. From taking those pills that suppress their i****e s****m , right?????
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.