We can't have people serving who won't follow orders. Where in the oath to obey superiors does it add "unless you don't like those orders"?
Where does it say you must take a "drug" that can likely k**l you? You know damn well that mandate is illegal. But don't despair , you will soon have your beloved Tyrannical Dictator Country, and you will live in the lap of luxury.
Where does it say you must take a "drug" that can likely k**l you? You know damn well that mandate is illegal. But don't despair , you will soon have your beloved Tyrannical Dictator Country, and you will live in the lap of luxury.
We can't have people serving who won't follow orders. Where in the oath to obey superiors does it add "unless you don't like those orders"?
***We can't have people serving who won't follow orders. Where in the oath to obey superiors does it add "unless you don't like those orders"? >>>We can't have people serving who won't follow their illegal orders. Hmmm. Maybe we can't have superiors in the military handing out illegal orders.
TruePatriot49Loc: The Democratic People's Republic Rhode Island
lpnmajor wrote:
We can't have people serving who won't follow orders. Where in the oath to obey superiors does it add "unless you don't like those orders"?
Majorpain, when I was in the Military, I was taught to obey all legal Orders and that I didn't have to obey any illegal or immoral orders. It is illegal to order someone to take an experimental drug. The "approved" P****r "v*****e " is not available in this country and may never be produced for the USA as the legal protection for P****r would go away. All the people who were injured or died from taking the approved "v*****e " could sue P****r and put them out of business. The Evil c*******t Democrats cannot allow one of their biggest contributors to be financially hurt. They care nothing about the Military though.