One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The BIG Lie on human fetal cells used for the Vax and Other Medical Research
Oct 14, 2021 08:45:03   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
Cliff Notes Version of this story:

"On October 6, with the help of James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas (PV), a whistleblower at P****r revealed, in leaked internal emails, that company executives have been, in PV’s words, “telling staff to be secretive about the use of human fetal tissue in laboratory testing of the C***D v*****e.

The video cites an email from the company’s senior director of worldwide research admitting that “One or more cell lines with an origin that can be traced back to human fetal tissue has been used in laboratory tests associated with the v*****e program.” The firm’s chief scientific officer specifically identifies the cell line involved as “HEK293T cells … (which) are ultimately derived from an aborted fetus.”” WHY, you may ask!

"In August, the University of Pittsburgh effectively made a horrifying admission. The Center for Medical Progress, which had to enlist the help of Judicial Watch before the university would respond to its Freedom of Information Act request, explained that the school’s GUDMAP program (full name: GenitoUrinary Development Molecular Anatomy Project), with the help of area Planned Parenthood a******n providers, was “allowing babies, some of the age of viability, to be delivered alive, and then k*****g them by cutting their kidneys out.

"K*****g a delivered-alive baby is textbook infanticide.

"The HEK293 line was created in the early 1970s. Months before the University of Pittsburgh’s admissions, AnnaMaria Cardinalli, an extraordinarily perceptive and conscientious writer, detailed the damning t***h about its origins at Crisis Magazine in January:

… To harvest a viable embryonic kidney … sufficiently healthy children old enough to have adequately-developed kidneys must be removed from the womb, alive, typically by cesarean section, and have their kidneys cut out. This must take place without anesthesia for the child, which would lessen the viability of the organs.

… The deliberate k*****g of an unwanted child (a little girl, in the case of HEK 293) took place in the tortuous manner it did precisely to obtain her organs for research. The harvest of her organs was the direct cause of her death, prior to which, she was a living child, outside the womb."

"In the decades since HEK293’s creation, its two most directly involved scientists, Drs. Alex van der Eb and Franklin Graham, have been vague in explaining the cell line’s origins."

"Cardinalli, who was not aware of Graham’s possible “miscarriage” speculation when she wrote her article, asserted that “There is no way that a spontaneous a******n could result in the cell line (as the kidneys cannot remain viable past the brief window in which they must be harvested).” It’s quite revealing that Dr. Graham speculated about something which seems so clearly impossible."

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/exclusive-p****rs-nervousness-c***d-v*****es-origins-conceals-horror-story/

Reply
Oct 14, 2021 08:56:23   #
skyrider
 
ACP45 wrote:
Cliff Notes Version of this story:

"On October 6, with the help of James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas (PV), a whistleblower at P****r revealed, in leaked internal emails, that company executives have been, in PV’s words, “telling staff to be secretive about the use of human fetal tissue in laboratory testing of the C***D v*****e.

The video cites an email from the company’s senior director of worldwide research admitting that “One or more cell lines with an origin that can be traced back to human fetal tissue has been used in laboratory tests associated with the v*****e program.” The firm’s chief scientific officer specifically identifies the cell line involved as “HEK293T cells … (which) are ultimately derived from an aborted fetus.”” WHY, you may ask!

"In August, the University of Pittsburgh effectively made a horrifying admission. The Center for Medical Progress, which had to enlist the help of Judicial Watch before the university would respond to its Freedom of Information Act request, explained that the school’s GUDMAP program (full name: GenitoUrinary Development Molecular Anatomy Project), with the help of area Planned Parenthood a******n providers, was “allowing babies, some of the age of viability, to be delivered alive, and then k*****g them by cutting their kidneys out.

"K*****g a delivered-alive baby is textbook infanticide.

"The HEK293 line was created in the early 1970s. Months before the University of Pittsburgh’s admissions, AnnaMaria Cardinalli, an extraordinarily perceptive and conscientious writer, detailed the damning t***h about its origins at Crisis Magazine in January:

… To harvest a viable embryonic kidney … sufficiently healthy children old enough to have adequately-developed kidneys must be removed from the womb, alive, typically by cesarean section, and have their kidneys cut out. This must take place without anesthesia for the child, which would lessen the viability of the organs.

… The deliberate k*****g of an unwanted child (a little girl, in the case of HEK 293) took place in the tortuous manner it did precisely to obtain her organs for research. The harvest of her organs was the direct cause of her death, prior to which, she was a living child, outside the womb."

"In the decades since HEK293’s creation, its two most directly involved scientists, Drs. Alex van der Eb and Franklin Graham, have been vague in explaining the cell line’s origins."

"Cardinalli, who was not aware of Graham’s possible “miscarriage” speculation when she wrote her article, asserted that “There is no way that a spontaneous a******n could result in the cell line (as the kidneys cannot remain viable past the brief window in which they must be harvested).” It’s quite revealing that Dr. Graham speculated about something which seems so clearly impossible."

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/exclusive-p****rs-nervousness-c***d-v*****es-origins-conceals-horror-story/
Cliff Notes Version of this story: br br "On... (show quote)


APC, this is so horrific that it will take me a while to think of words to be able to reply.

Reply
Oct 14, 2021 09:24:19   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
This is horrible! Not human but satan in action!

Reply
Oct 14, 2021 10:38:51   #
currahee506
 
"Evolution, C*******m, N**iism, and Satanism," are all philosophical packages of lies that, once they get into a person's core through intense indoctrination, like the kind that has been going on for decades in the "public schools" of the country, produces monsters that support this kind of murderous activity. The fact that these monsters cover it up shows that they know it is wrong and will be the recipients of hell.

Reply
Oct 14, 2021 13:19:06   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
ACP45 wrote:
Cliff Notes Version of this story:

"On October 6, with the help of James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas (PV), a whistleblower at P****r revealed, in leaked internal emails, that company executives have been, in PV’s words, “telling staff to be secretive about the use of human fetal tissue in laboratory testing of the C***D v*****e.

The video cites an email from the company’s senior director of worldwide research admitting that “One or more cell lines with an origin that can be traced back to human fetal tissue has been used in laboratory tests associated with the v*****e program.” The firm’s chief scientific officer specifically identifies the cell line involved as “HEK293T cells … (which) are ultimately derived from an aborted fetus.”” WHY, you may ask!

"In August, the University of Pittsburgh effectively made a horrifying admission. The Center for Medical Progress, which had to enlist the help of Judicial Watch before the university would respond to its Freedom of Information Act request, explained that the school’s GUDMAP program (full name: GenitoUrinary Development Molecular Anatomy Project), with the help of area Planned Parenthood a******n providers, was “allowing babies, some of the age of viability, to be delivered alive, and then k*****g them by cutting their kidneys out.

"K*****g a delivered-alive baby is textbook infanticide.

"The HEK293 line was created in the early 1970s. Months before the University of Pittsburgh’s admissions, AnnaMaria Cardinalli, an extraordinarily perceptive and conscientious writer, detailed the damning t***h about its origins at Crisis Magazine in January:

… To harvest a viable embryonic kidney … sufficiently healthy children old enough to have adequately-developed kidneys must be removed from the womb, alive, typically by cesarean section, and have their kidneys cut out. This must take place without anesthesia for the child, which would lessen the viability of the organs.

… The deliberate k*****g of an unwanted child (a little girl, in the case of HEK 293) took place in the tortuous manner it did precisely to obtain her organs for research. The harvest of her organs was the direct cause of her death, prior to which, she was a living child, outside the womb."

"In the decades since HEK293’s creation, its two most directly involved scientists, Drs. Alex van der Eb and Franklin Graham, have been vague in explaining the cell line’s origins."

"Cardinalli, who was not aware of Graham’s possible “miscarriage” speculation when she wrote her article, asserted that “There is no way that a spontaneous a******n could result in the cell line (as the kidneys cannot remain viable past the brief window in which they must be harvested).” It’s quite revealing that Dr. Graham speculated about something which seems so clearly impossible."

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/exclusive-p****rs-nervousness-c***d-v*****es-origins-conceals-horror-story/
Cliff Notes Version of this story: br br "On... (show quote)



Remember “Soylent Green… it’s people…”?

Well, here we are.

Now that we know that aborted baby parts are used in the making of the v*****es, I certainly cannot, under any circumstance, take the v*****e. It would be being complicit in murder. It would be the opposite of Christianity. Christ laid down his life for us, which is the opposite of murdering others to save one’s own life.

All Christians should declare religious exemptions from these ungodly v*****es!

You cannot legally be discriminated for religious convictions in the USA. Know your rights!

Here is a place for help, but there are others…

Peggy Hall…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmfziRj3StQ

Here’s a t***scribed excerpt…

"Let's talk about how you can successfully get your religious exemption without all of the shenanigans of your employer, It is absolutely astonishing to me when I hear from healthy Americans that have submitted their religious exemption. (Again you're invoking it, you're notifying your employer because you are exempt) And then they come back with all of this gobbledygook saying “it's company policy and you can't defy it and you have to follow it or we're going to show you the door”.
"That's against the law. That would be like your boss saying it's company policy that you have to sleep with the boss, we like to be one big happy family here, and we think that it's really good for team building when you sleep with the boss, and if you don't do it we're going to show you the door.”
"I want you to use that type of analogy when it comes to your body and what your employer is requiring you to do with your body... It is an unwanted intrusion of your body, period. Now you're going to invoke your… religious exemption…whereby you state I am exempt from these activities, they do not apply to me. That's what exemption means. And then you go about the process of accommodation. I've done videos on this before and I hope that you're going binge watch my religious exemption playlist because I've got 75 and counting videos, I've got hundreds and hundreds of videos on my YouTube channel and yes I'm on Rumble and b***hute and Peggyhill.TV for the add free censorship free deep dive. I'm on telegram, I'm on Instagram, I'm on Facebook. My goal is to be everywhere you are in everywhere everyone is so that they will get this important information about their rights.
"Listen you are protected by civil rights law you are protected by title 7 of the US Civil Rights Act of 1964. It says you have the right to be free from discrimination at the workplace. They cannot discriminate against you because your medical condition or disability or your age or your g****r or your skin color or your religious views. So you state I am exempt from these activities because they conflict with my sincerely held religious beliefs.
"Now here's where people are getting into hot water they're bringing in other aspects that do not apply to their religious exemption. I just saw one right now where the employee was requesting of the employer, “I want to have in writing that you are going to be liable for any side effects that occur to me because of this activity you're requiring me to do and I also want to know that you are, there were a couple of things that they said along these lines, but they had nothing to do with your religious exemption. That may be true that you want to find those things out. But you have got to stick strictly to your religious views when you are seeking a religious exemption. Don't talk about the science, don't talk about the medicine, don't talk about the side effects, don't talk about friends of yours and what happened to them, don't talk about The WHO, and you know that guy that used to run Microsoft, don't talk about all of that when you're seeking an accommodation for your religious views. Your employer is going to find every way they can to fight back so keep it simple, keep it clear ,keep it concise, keep it short.
“For me I would state in a simple paragraph: I am notifying you that I am exempt from this activity based on my sincerely held religious views that God created me with an i****e s****m and I will not alter his design. It is a sin against my God given conscience to allow unwanted intrusions into my body which is a temple of the Holy Spirit.”
“I would just leave it at that.”


For more:
https://www.thehealthyamerican.org/religious-exemptions

https://www.thehealthyamerican.org/fact-sheet-for-religious-exemptions

Reply
Oct 14, 2021 13:43:59   #
skyrider
 
TommyRadd wrote:
Remember “Soylent Green… it’s people…”?

Well, here we are.

Now that we know that aborted baby parts are used in the making of the v*****es, I certainly cannot, under any circumstance, take the v*****e. It would be being complicit in murder. It would be the opposite of Christianity. Christ laid down his life for us, which is the opposite of murdering others to save one’s own life.

All Christians should declare religious exemptions from these ungodly v*****es!

You cannot legally be discriminated for religious convictions in the USA. Know your rights!

Here is a place for help, but there are others…

Peggy Hall…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmfziRj3StQ

Here’s a t***scribed excerpt…

"Let's talk about how you can successfully get your religious exemption without all of the shenanigans of your employer, It is absolutely astonishing to me when I hear from healthy Americans that have submitted their religious exemption. (Again you're invoking it, you're notifying your employer because you are exempt) And then they come back with all of this gobbledygook saying “it's company policy and you can't defy it and you have to follow it or we're going to show you the door”.
"That's against the law. That would be like your boss saying it's company policy that you have to sleep with the boss, we like to be one big happy family here, and we think that it's really good for team building when you sleep with the boss, and if you don't do it we're going to show you the door.”
"I want you to use that type of analogy when it comes to your body and what your employer is requiring you to do with your body... It is an unwanted intrusion of your body, period. Now you're going to invoke your… religious exemption…whereby you state I am exempt from these activities, they do not apply to me. That's what exemption means. And then you go about the process of accommodation. I've done videos on this before and I hope that you're going binge watch my religious exemption playlist because I've got 75 and counting videos, I've got hundreds and hundreds of videos on my YouTube channel and yes I'm on Rumble and b***hute and Peggyhill.TV for the add free censorship free deep dive. I'm on telegram, I'm on Instagram, I'm on Facebook. My goal is to be everywhere you are in everywhere everyone is so that they will get this important information about their rights.
"Listen you are protected by civil rights law you are protected by title 7 of the US Civil Rights Act of 1964. It says you have the right to be free from discrimination at the workplace. They cannot discriminate against you because your medical condition or disability or your age or your g****r or your skin color or your religious views. So you state I am exempt from these activities because they conflict with my sincerely held religious beliefs.
"Now here's where people are getting into hot water they're bringing in other aspects that do not apply to their religious exemption. I just saw one right now where the employee was requesting of the employer, “I want to have in writing that you are going to be liable for any side effects that occur to me because of this activity you're requiring me to do and I also want to know that you are, there were a couple of things that they said along these lines, but they had nothing to do with your religious exemption. That may be true that you want to find those things out. But you have got to stick strictly to your religious views when you are seeking a religious exemption. Don't talk about the science, don't talk about the medicine, don't talk about the side effects, don't talk about friends of yours and what happened to them, don't talk about The WHO, and you know that guy that used to run Microsoft, don't talk about all of that when you're seeking an accommodation for your religious views. Your employer is going to find every way they can to fight back so keep it simple, keep it clear ,keep it concise, keep it short.
“For me I would state in a simple paragraph: I am notifying you that I am exempt from this activity based on my sincerely held religious views that God created me with an i****e s****m and I will not alter his design. It is a sin against my God given conscience to allow unwanted intrusions into my body which is a temple of the Holy Spirit.”
“I would just leave it at that.”


For more:
https://www.thehealthyamerican.org/religious-exemptions

https://www.thehealthyamerican.org/fact-sheet-for-religious-exemptions
Remember “Soylent Green… it’s people…”? br br We... (show quote)


Good post, TommyRadd.

Reply
Oct 14, 2021 15:23:09   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
skyrider wrote:
Good post, TommyRadd.


Thanks. For me, Peggy Hall's analogy of "sleeping with the boss" was pretty powerful! I can't believe I just recently heard about her. The information is what is important. Of course the PTB don't want anyone knowing any of this stuff.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.