eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Natural immunity vs. V*****e-induced immunity: the issue that terrifies the pro-v**x mafia
by Jon Rappoport
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
As my readers know, I’ve been proving, for the past year, that the SARS-CoV-2 v***s doesn’t exist. Therefore, the whole issue of immunity is a non-starter. Immune to what? To a phantom. A myth. A superstition. A fairy tale. A collective hallucination.

NEVERTHELESS, I make frequent forays into the fantasy bubble-world, where millions and millions of people believe the v***s is real, the case numbers are real, and the v*****e is relevant. I do this to point out the ridiculous contradictions and internal inconsistencies and lies within that bubble.

I’m making another such foray now. For the purposes of argument only, I’ll assume the v***s is real and v***l immunity is real and discussion about the v*****e is relevant.

A key question within the bubble: is naturally acquired immunity, achieved through infection by the v***s, equivalent to, or better than, immunity acquired as a result of v******tion?

The answer to that question is vital for the pro-v**x mafia. They MUST claim natural immunity is inferior. Otherwise, their goose is cooked.

Otherwise, their whole brutal campaign to force shots into arms is doomed.

Enter Senator Rand Paul. The other day, in a hearing, he took Biden’s Health and Human Services Secretary, Xavier Becerra, to the woodshed, to the cleaners, to school.

Infowars reporter Steve Watson wrote a piece covering Rand Paul’s merciless critique:

“Referring to a recent Israeli study that found v******ted people are up to seven times more likely to get C****-** than those who have natural immunity, Paul told Becerra that Americans should be allowed to take a ‘Look at a study with 2.5 million people and say you know what? Looks like my [natural] immunity is as good as the v*****e’ or not.”

“’Maybe in a free country, I ought to be able to make that decision,’ Paul urged.”

“’Instead, you’ve chosen to travel the country calling people like Johnathan Isaac, and others, myself included, flat-earthers,’ the Senator continued, adding ‘We find that very insulting. It goes against the science’.”

“Paul then asked Becerra if he was a qualified medical doctor, knowing that he isn’t.”

“’So you’re not a medical doctor. Do you have a science degree?’ Paul further questioned, knowing that Becerra doesn’t.”

“’You alone are on high and you’ve made these decisions, a lawyer with no scientific background, no medical degree…this is an arrogance coupled with an authoritarianism that is unseemly and un-American,’ Paul blasted.

“’You sir, are the one ignoring the science. The vast preponderance of scientific studies, dozens and dozens, show robust, long-lasting [natural] immunity after infection,’ the Senator further charged, demanding that Becerra should apologise for being dishonest.”

If natural immunity is superior to v*****e-acquired immunity, then millions and millions of people who have been labeled “C***D cases” and recovered…don’t need the v*****e.

Oops.

Wait. There’s more. A few months ago, the FDA issued a strange edict that confused many medical professionals. The agency suddenly announced that C***D antibody tests would no longer be considered useful or accurate.

The hidden reason for that decision is becoming clear. Widespread antibody testing would reveal that an EXTRAORDINARY number of people developed v***l infections and recovered. A far greater number than anyone expected or assumed. They have antibodies against the v***s and they’re healthy.

And THAT revelation would sink the pro-v**x ship to the bottom of the sea. Because, obviously, all those antibody-positive people developed natural immunity to the v***s and have no need for a v*****e.

Then, on top of all this, the PCR test, when run at a sensitivity of 35 cycles or above, also indicates millions and millions of people are infected by the v***s and recover nicely. THOSE people as well would need no v*****e.

Getting the picture?

The total tonnage of scientific bulls**t required to argue that everyone should be v******ted is titanic.

Hence, we have F***i, sold-out talking news heads, v*****e mandates, lying doctors, lying public health officials, etc.

It would not surprise me at all if it turned out that 80-90 percent of the population---subjected to testing and re-testing---at one time or another qualified as C***D cases---and recovered nicely or were never sick in the first place…AND THEREFORE HAVE NO NEED FOR A V*****E.

---And that concludes today’s episode of Lunatics on the Loose inside the Mad Mad World Where People Believe the V***s is Real and the V*****e is Relevant and Necessary. As I say, I make forays into that world to demonstrate the contradictions and lies the liars are spouting, even on their own terms.

The liars are no more reliable than drunks in a bar at 2AM.

However, they’re a lot more dangerous.

okie don

The v*****e is a money maker.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

As always; follow the money.

Pretty sinister if you ask me.

Jlw Loc: Wisconsin

Yep and now P****r says it won't disclose the recipe for the shot. Why give up their money maker

okie don

Seems to me that when a manufacturer of a product is released from legal liability if the product fails or causes injury something is seriously wrong!

Jlw Loc: Wisconsin

Yeppers

hbmac10

The PCR test is totally unreliable. A group of doctors took 8 swabs from an individual and sent the swabs to 8 different labs and the results were mixed for pos and neg. the doctors then two individuals that had symptoms and they both tested positive. They then did a blood test and found both individuals actually had two different types of flu and not c***d.

I watched a video where a PCR test was done on a glass of coca cola, a kwie fruit and an orange and they all tested positive for c***d.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Hard to believe anything the government puts out.
Any agendas here?

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

DeSantis And Psaki Trade Barbs As Texas And Florida Block V*****e Mandates
https://youtu.be/ncyd2PqFUZQ

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Just a refresher;

30 facts you NEED to know: Your C***d Cribsheet
https://off-guardian.org/wp-content/medialibrary/c***d-facts-banner2.jpg?x13635

A collection of all the arguments you’ll ever need.

We get a lot of e-mails and private messages along these lines “do you have a source for X?” or “can you point me to mask studies?” or “I know I saw a graph for mortality, but I can’t find it anymore”. And we understand, it’s been a long 18 months, and there are so many statistics and numbers to try and keep straight in your head.

So, to deal with all these requests, we decided to make a bullet-pointed and sourced list for all the key points. A one-stop-shop.

Here are key facts and sources about the alleged “p******c”, that will help you get a grasp on what has happened to the world since January 2020, and help you enlighten any of your friends who might be still trapped in the New Normal fog (click links to skip):

“C***d deaths” – Lockdowns – PCR Tests – “asymptomatic infection” – Ventilators – Masks – V*****es – Deception & Foreknowledge

*

PART I: “C***D DEATHS” & MORTALITY
1. The survival rate of “C***d” is over 99%. Government medical experts went out of their way to underline, from the beginning of the p******c, that the vast majority of the population are not in any danger from C***d.


Almost all studies on the infection-fatality ratio (IFR) of C***d have returned results between 0.04% and 0.5%. Meaning C***d’s survival rate is at least 99.5%.

*

2. There has been NO unusual excess mortality. The press has called 2020 the UK’s “deadliest year since world war two”, but this is misleading because it ignores the massive increase in the population since that time. A more reasonable statistical measure of mortality is Age-Standardised Mortality Rate (ASMR):


By this measure, 2020 isn’t even the worst year for mortality since 2000, In fact since 1943 only 9 years have been better than 2020.

Similarly, in the US the ASMR for 2020 is only at 2004 levels: