One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Dissent is Terrorism
Page <prev 2 of 2
Oct 10, 2021 17:00:07   #
Radiance3
 
American Vet wrote:
As reported earlier this week, Attorney General Merrick Garland sent a memo to the FBI announcing a “partnership among federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement to address threats against school administrators, boards members, teachers and staff” as well as “a series of measures designed to address the rise in criminal conduct directed toward school personnel” in response to a National School Board Association letter claiming parental opposition to school mandates, like mask mandates, and ideology, such as CRT, “could be the equivalent to a form of domestic terrorism and h**e crimes.”

https://defconnews.com/2021/10/10/over-60-gop-members-of-congress-demand-answers-from-doj-for-targeting-parents/
As reported earlier this week, Attorney General Me... (show quote)

===================
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1992/09/dissent-in-n**i-germany/532725/

History repeats itself. During 1943, and beyond, Germany k**led and locked up all those who expressed dissention from the German -Hitlerian Totalitarian government. The Germans' children were taken by the government from their parents, indoctrinated them to the Marxist style to follow and obey.

The Germans parents could never intervene in the lives of their children. And if they do, off to the guillotine.

This present United States government is similarly taking away the rights of their parents their desires to help their children develop the guidelines of moral, educational, and ethical standards. Biden and his DOJ, denied parents of teaching their children to share their kids the Christian virtues of life.

The DOJ acts like a Gestapo, by denying the parents shape their children to achieve their best, to instill wisdom, character, and ethics, and all the virtues of living a Christian life.

DOJ focus on their schools indoctrination how to shape the young minds of their children without parents' consent. That is Hitlerian style of 1943.

Reply
Oct 11, 2021 05:37:09   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Threats go beyond "dissent"


I suppose l*****t buttwipes like A****a and B*M don't constitute threats, but pissed off parents who are concerned about what their kids are being taught are terrorists. Nice to see where your loyalty lies. it ain't with the Constitution I believe you once took an oath to protect.

Reply
Oct 11, 2021 06:14:12   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
Kevyn wrote:
Use your minuscule mind to look up the legal definition of terrorism. He couldn’t be more right.


What are the three key elements in the definition of terrorism?
This customary rule requires the following three key elements: (i) the perpetration of a criminal act (such as murder, kidnapping, hostage-taking, arson, and so on), or threatening such an act; (ii) the intent to spread fear among the population (which would generally entail the creation of public danger) or directly.

What is the CIA's definition of terrorism?
2656f (d), defines terrorism as "premeditated, politically motivated violence. perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents."
The difficulty in assigning a truly comprehensive definition to terrorism lies in the fact that not only is it challenging to be specific when motives, targets, and methods differ so broadly from case to case, but the complexity of untangling the overlaps within each of these categories makes the task virtually impossible.
The universal definition of terrorism, as it stands, holds little practical use, outside of serving as a broad summary of the phenomenon. Surely the concern of academics and policy-makers should lie in creating a set of definitions that reflect the variation between motivations and allow for the most effective means of fighting the terrorist threat.
https://www.e-ir.info/2009/05/14/why-has-defining-terrorism-proved-so-difficult/

Reply
 
 
Oct 11, 2021 07:10:05   #
Big Kahuna
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
I suppose l*****t buttwipes like A****a and B*M don't constitute threats, but pissed off parents who are concerned about what their kids are being taught are terrorists. Nice to see where your loyalty lies. it ain't with the Constitution I believe you once took an oath to protect.


The only thing Ipm minor wants to protect is his own sorrowful a$$.

Reply
Oct 11, 2021 09:41:32   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
Kevyn wrote:
Use your minuscule mind to look up the legal definition of terrorism. He couldn’t be more right.


Youu couldn't be more wrong!

Reply
Oct 11, 2021 09:42:19   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
American Vet wrote:
Terrorism is the use of force or violence against persons or property in violation of
the criminal laws of the United States for purposes of intimidation, coercion, or
ransom
https://www.fema.gov/pdf/areyouready/terrorism.pdf


Threatening to hold school boards accountable at the next e******n does not constitute terrorism.

As your teacher and mentor, I encourage you to try a unique approach - thinking. I understand it is an alien concept to you; but do try it sometime.
Terrorism is the use of force or violence against ... (show quote)



Reply
Oct 11, 2021 11:52:55   #
Kevyn
 
American Vet wrote:
Terrorism is the use of force or violence against persons or property in violation of
the criminal laws of the United States for purposes of intimidation, coercion, or
ransom
https://www.fema.gov/pdf/areyouready/terrorism.pdf


Threatening to hold school boards accountable at the next e******n does not constitute terrorism.

As your teacher and mentor, I encourage you to try a unique approach - thinking. I understand it is an alien concept to you; but do try it sometime.
Terrorism is the use of force or violence against ... (show quote)

Threats of violence are an entirely different matter and should be treated as such.

Reply
 
 
Oct 11, 2021 13:14:21   #
okie don
 
CRT is not good for America and must be stopped.

Reply
Oct 11, 2021 13:38:34   #
American Vet
 
Kevyn wrote:
Threats of violence are an entirely different matter and should be treated as such.


Indeed they are: And, in these cases, extremely rare and are handled at the local level.

Reply
Oct 11, 2021 17:49:04   #
martsiva
 
Radiance3 wrote:
===============
Dissent is a constitutional process. The DOJ is disarming the American people of their constitutional duties, as provided also at the Declaration of Independence.

Excerpt.
We hold these t***hs to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.-

-That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and t***sient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
=============== br i Dissent is a constitutional... (show quote)



Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.