lpnmajor wrote:
Threats go beyond "dissent"
I suppose l*****t buttwipes like A****a and B*M don't constitute threats, but pissed off parents who are concerned about what their kids are being taught are terrorists. Nice to see where your loyalty lies. it ain't with the Constitution I believe you once took an oath to protect.
Kevyn wrote:
Use your minuscule mind to look up the legal definition of terrorism. He couldn’t be more right.
What are the three key elements in the definition of terrorism?
This customary rule requires the following three key elements: (i) the perpetration of a criminal act (such as murder, kidnapping, hostage-taking, arson, and so on), or threatening such an act; (ii) the intent to spread fear among the population (which would generally entail the creation of public danger) or directly.
What is the CIA's definition of terrorism?
2656f (d), defines terrorism as "premeditated, politically motivated violence. perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents."
The difficulty in assigning a truly comprehensive definition to terrorism lies in the fact that not only is it challenging to be specific when motives, targets, and methods differ so broadly from case to case, but the complexity of untangling the overlaps within each of these categories makes the task virtually impossible.
The universal definition of terrorism, as it stands, holds little practical use, outside of serving as a broad summary of the phenomenon. Surely the concern of academics and policy-makers should lie in creating a set of definitions that reflect the variation between motivations and allow for the most effective means of fighting the terrorist threat.
https://www.e-ir.info/2009/05/14/why-has-defining-terrorism-proved-so-difficult/
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
I suppose l*****t buttwipes like A****a and B*M don't constitute threats, but pissed off parents who are concerned about what their kids are being taught are terrorists. Nice to see where your loyalty lies. it ain't with the Constitution I believe you once took an oath to protect.
The only thing Ipm minor wants to protect is his own sorrowful a$$.
Kevyn wrote:
Use your minuscule mind to look up the legal definition of terrorism. He couldn’t be more right.
Youu couldn't be more wrong!
American Vet wrote:
Terrorism is the use of force or violence against persons or property in violation of
the criminal laws of the United States for purposes of intimidation, coercion, or
ransom
https://www.fema.gov/pdf/areyouready/terrorism.pdfThreatening to hold school boards accountable at the next e******n does not constitute terrorism.
As your teacher and mentor, I encourage you to try a unique approach - thinking. I understand it is an alien concept to you; but do try it sometime.
Terrorism is the use of force or violence against ... (
show quote)
Threats of violence are an entirely different matter and should be treated as such.
CRT is not good for America and must be stopped.
Kevyn wrote:
Threats of violence are an entirely different matter and should be treated as such.
Indeed they are: And, in these cases, extremely rare and are handled at the local level.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.