Some restaurants require a jacket in order to be seated, almost all places of business require shirts and shoes to enter. Even nudist colonies require guests to put towels down when they sit on the furniture. These requirements in some instances are buy the business and others by health code. Why do the whiners feel a mask mandate is any different?
Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
Kevyn wrote:
Some restaurants require a jacket in order to be seated, almost all places of business require shirts and shoes to enter. Even nudist colonies require guests to put towels down when they sit on the furniture. These requirements in some instances are buy the business and others by health code. Why do the whiners feel a mask mandate is any different?
Why don't they mandate masks and v******tions for the myriad of other contagious diseases then?
Kevyn wrote:
Some restaurants require a jacket in order to be seated, almost all places of business require shirts and shoes to enter. Even nudist colonies require guests to put towels down when they sit on the furniture. These requirements in some instances are buy the business and others by health code. Why do the whiners feel a mask mandate is any different?
If you need to ask this question then you're beyond help and have no knowledge of our Constitution, declaration of Independence or the Bill of Rights.. And The Supreme Court of the United States rulings..
lindajoy wrote:
If you need to ask this question then you're beyond help and have no knowledge of our Constitution, declaration of Independence or the Bill of Rights.. And The Supreme Court of the United States rulings..
Please site them, you don’t even have a right to be topless in public.
Parky60 wrote:
Why don't they mandate masks and v******tions for the myriad of other contagious diseases then?
They do and have for years
Kevyn wrote:
Please site them, you don’t even have a right to be topless in public.
You wouldn’t understand…had enough dialogue with you to come to this conclusion given past discussion.
lindajoy wrote:
You wouldn’t understand…had enough dialogue with you to come to this conclusion given past discussion.
I never read or respond to his posts. Not worth the time.
Liberty Tree wrote:
I never read or respond to his posts. Not worth the time.
Agreed… He’s just gaslighting you to take up your time.
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
Kevyn wrote:
Some restaurants require a jacket in order to be seated, almost all places of business require shirts and shoes to enter. Even nudist colonies require guests to put towels down when they sit on the furniture. These requirements in some instances are buy the business and others by health code. Why do the whiners feel a mask mandate is any different?
Requirements of patrons by a business on their own property is one thing. Federal mandates on businesses or citizens using government police powers to enforce their mandates is another and is f*****m.
As far as the question of constitutionality, I suppose, since many have deemed the constitution as fluid, that everything in their minds is constitutional if they deem it so. Once something is deemed constitutional, due to precedent, it is always constitutional. That is the road we have been going down for a hundred years. That is why our freedoms, rights and privacy have been dying from the death of a thousand cuts as federal government power and overreach grows.
While do you feel the need to attack people for whining about f*****m?
Kevyn wrote:
Some restaurants require a jacket in order to be seated, almost all places of business require shirts and shoes to enter. Even nudist colonies require guests to put towels down when they sit on the furniture. These requirements in some instances are buy the business and others by health code. Why do the whiners feel a mask mandate is any different?
Does a mask work? What purpose does it serve besides showing compliance?
Kevyn wrote:
Some restaurants require a jacket in order to be seated, almost all places of business require shirts and shoes to enter. Even nudist colonies require guests to put towels down when they sit on the furniture. These requirements in some instances are buy the business and others by health code. Why do the whiners feel a mask mandate is any different?
I think customers should be able to tell restaurants that they can refuse to wear masks, shirts, or shoes. Right now thanks to Democrats, customers can tell businesses to add items to their menus. If those items are not added to the menus those customers can get the businesses fined and shut down, so why quibble over masks, shirts, shoes, or even pants ? I am specifically referring to forcing businesses to add Gay Wedding Cakes to their menus.
Kevyn wrote:
Please site them, you don’t even have a right to be topless in public.
Wrong again, as per the norm.
Kevyn wrote:
Please site them, you don’t even have a right to be topless in public.
Because being topless in public where there are small children is offensive to almost every adult in this country. It's obscene and offensive to show private areas to pubic. There's adult only strip clubs for that.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.