Things liberals believe that conservatives don't.
Oct 3, 2021 10:29:22 #
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
1) The constitution is a fluid document to be redefined to contemporary times.
2) Inalienable rights are limited rights regulated by the government
3) Government tax and spend is investment.
4) A crisis is an opportunity.
5) Bigger government is the solution to every problem.
6) Equitable results is the same as Equal opportunity.
7) USA was founded as and still is a r****t country.
8) Crime is determined by the perpetrator not the action.
9) America needs to fundamentally change.
10) The intended end justifies the means.
2) Inalienable rights are limited rights regulated by the government
3) Government tax and spend is investment.
4) A crisis is an opportunity.
5) Bigger government is the solution to every problem.
6) Equitable results is the same as Equal opportunity.
7) USA was founded as and still is a r****t country.
8) Crime is determined by the perpetrator not the action.
9) America needs to fundamentally change.
10) The intended end justifies the means.
Oct 3, 2021 10:39:38 #
Oct 3, 2021 10:44:11 #
Strycker wrote:
1) The constitution is a fluid document to be rede... (show quote)
Excellent post and a frightening concept, but just what the Democrats want.
Oct 3, 2021 12:13:43 #
Oct 3, 2021 12:36:45 #
Oct 3, 2021 12:43:35 #
Oct 3, 2021 12:48:55 #
Strycker wrote:
1) The constitution is a fluid document to be rede... (show quote)
Hit the nail on the head! A Perfect Ten!
Oct 3, 2021 14:59:32 #
Strycker wrote:
1) The constitution is a fluid document to be rede... (show quote)
#1 is correct , it is a fluid document with provisions in it for updating it.
But we can’t have Donald trump doing it all by himself !
Oct 3, 2021 15:06:58 #
Strycker wrote:
1) The constitution is a fluid document to be redefined to contemporary times.
Liberals don't operate on believing things, they tend to know things to be fact...and the constitution is a set of guidelines that has the fluidity to adapt to changing times built into the mechanism.
Oct 3, 2021 16:02:05 #
woodguru wrote:
Liberals don't operate on believing things, they tend to know things to be fact...and the constitution is a set of guidelines that has the fluidity to adapt to changing times built into the mechanism.
It's not fluid enough to be changed or ignored on a whim ala St. Obama or Creepy Joe. There are procedures to be followed. Law based on the constitution is NOT a suggestion as some dopes think it is. Want a change? Do it right.
Oct 3, 2021 16:24:57 #
Milosia2 wrote:
#1 is correct , it is a fluid document with provisions in it for updating it.
But we can’t have Donald trump doing it all by himself !
But we can’t have Donald trump doing it all by himself !
But it's ok for obama to try to change it all by himself (DACA) ? Bottom line it is not ok for ANY president to change by himself/herself. The fact that you happen to agree with one side or the other does not change that.
Oct 3, 2021 16:43:16 #
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
Milosia2 wrote:
#1 is correct , it is a fluid document with provisions in it for updating it.
But we can’t have Donald trump doing it all by himself !
But we can’t have Donald trump doing it all by himself !
There is a difference between redefining the meanings of the words to bypass the amendment process and actually amending the document.
"...regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes." does not mean regulations on everything from toilets and toasters.
"promote the general welfare,” does not mean provide free stuff.
Oct 3, 2021 17:02:40 #
Strycker wrote:
There is a difference between redefining the meanings of the words to bypass the amendment process and actually amending the document.
"...regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes." does not mean regulations on everything from toilets and toasters.
"promote the general welfare,” does not mean provide free stuff.
"...regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes." does not mean regulations on everything from toilets and toasters.
"promote the general welfare,” does not mean provide free stuff.
👍👍👍👍
Oct 3, 2021 17:47:51 #
CarryOn wrote:
But it's ok for obama to try to change it all by himself (DACA) ? Bottom line it is not ok for ANY president to change by himself/herself. The fact that you happen to agree with one side or the other does not change that.
Oct 3, 2021 17:54:22 #
Strycker wrote:
There is a difference between redefining the meanings of the words to bypass the amendment process and actually amending the document.
"...regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes." does not mean regulations on everything from toilets and toasters.
"promote the general welfare,” does not mean provide free stuff.
"...regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes." does not mean regulations on everything from toilets and toasters.
"promote the general welfare,” does not mean provide free stuff.
Yes, a HUGE and cumbersome difference for amendments. Thank you founders! Originalist interpretation is what we want and have at SCOTUS now.
Will someone please tell STUPID that President Trump is not in Office anymore.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.