Against all understanding or even sanity, why do many anti-maskers and a*****xxers vehementally oppose those who follow health regulations
Sep 15, 2021 07:00:49 #
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
Try the dictionary for "viable". Most of the babies that have been slaughtered at Planned Parenthood were viable - but they weren't profitable. It was only their organs that made their murder profitable.
If you want to find evil, follow the money!!!!!!!!
Sep 15, 2021 07:08:51 #
older and wiser wrote:
If you want to find evil, follow the money!!!!!!!!
That is a true statement. At the end of every trail that involves money or profit is usually evil and corruption attached. Oh ya , & a Democrat !
Sep 15, 2021 07:17:58 #
Gman65 wrote:
That is a true statement. At the end of every trail that involves money or profit is usually evil and corruption attached. Oh ya , & a Democrat !
So who are the politicians that invested in the face mask producers ?? The same ones that continue to promote the use no doubt
Sep 15, 2021 07:50:26 #
Big dog wrote:
So who are the politicians that invested in the face mask producers ?? The same ones that continue to promote the use no doubt
You can bet that if you followed the funding , production , and government orders of facemask at the start of the p******c , all the way up to even today , there is no doubt MANY politician's that has money overflowing out of their pockets from profits made on facemask production investments . Kind of the same profit margin that pelosi and her husband seek to make on their investment made on Tesla electric vehicles. Coincidental that the government announced that their intentions is to have the entire fleet of government vehicle's powered by electric very soon , and records revealed pelosi and her husband purchased major stock in Tesla , right before this announcement was made public ?? As said before , follow the profit trail and you'll find evil and corruption , and you find nothing more evil and corrupt then pelosi.
Sep 15, 2021 07:59:50 #
Gman65 wrote:
You can bet that if you followed the funding , pr... (show quote)
Everybody and their mother was making face masks. No one had a monopoly. The suppliers were not prepared for the demand worldwide.
Sep 15, 2021 09:59:09 #
Sep 15, 2021 14:32:57 #
Owl32 wrote:
Emily and Ginny you truly tell the T***H.
TY, Owl32. You don't need a web to spin when telling the t***h!
Sep 15, 2021 19:37:52 #
moldyoldy wrote:
ba·by
/ˈbābē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
a very young child, especially one newly or recently born.
/ˈbābē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
a very young child, especially one newly or recently born.
You have no idea how I pronounced baby. That has nothing to do with anything. Pronunciation is not definition. Lets us take your own definition of baby, " a very young child, especially one newly or recently born. "
The born part is of your definition is an add on. Being born is therefore not a requirement of your own definition. Thus you don't have a leg to stand on. The " baby " inside of it's Mother can be a young child. A 7 month old baby could be taken from the womb and put in an incubator, and by your definition becomes human, worthy of protection. No one, not even Mom can legally murder Junior in his incubator.
But lets us leave Junior inside of Mom, and for the next 2 months if Mom gets mad at him, she can have his little brains sucked right out of his head.
Sep 15, 2021 20:52:06 #
son of witless wrote:
You have no idea how I pronounced baby. That has n... (show quote)
Your reading comprehension is still greatly lacking.
Sep 16, 2021 07:15:02 #
moldyoldy wrote:
Your reading comprehension is still greatly lacking.
That's your and other k**lers response!
Sep 16, 2021 17:27:35 #
moldyoldy wrote:
Your reading comprehension is still greatly lacking.
I make the same charge against you. I don't think you understood your own post. Pronunciation has nothing to do with definition. You confused the two, and now you refuse to acknowledge your mistake.
Sep 16, 2021 18:20:31 #
son of witless wrote:
I make the same charge against you. I don't think you understood your own post. Pronunciation has nothing to do with definition. You confused the two, and now you refuse to acknowledge your mistake.
When you look up a definition it usually has a phonetic spelling to show you how to pronounce it. That was not something that I added.
Sep 16, 2021 19:46:26 #
moldyoldy wrote:
When you look up a definition it usually has a phonetic spelling to show you how to pronounce it. That was not something that I added.
What are you talking about ? We are typing to one another. You scolded me for my pronunciation. How does pronunciation enter into anything ?
Sep 16, 2021 21:22:51 #
son of witless wrote:
What are you talking about ? We are typing to one another. You scolded me for my pronunciation. How does pronunciation enter into anything ?
You are proving that you are a numbskull.
numbskull noun
Save Word
To save this word, you'll need to log in.
Log In
numb·skull | \ ˈnəm-ˌskəl \
variants: or less commonly numskull
Definition of numbskull
1 : a dull or stupid person : DUNCE
2 : a thick or muddled head
Sep 17, 2021 07:47:20 #
son of witless wrote:
What are you talking about ? We are typing to one another. You scolded me for my pronunciation. How does pronunciation enter into anything ?
He is a hippocrite and proving it to you!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.