Oh, my, this "i**********nist" is in TROUBLE
Sep 8, 2021 11:44:31 #
Singularity wrote:
It was an i**********n. Fortunately, it was pretty pitifully executed and failed miserably in achieving its stated goals, like most of Trump's enterprises.
Still, legally, it's the thought and intent that counts! Admittedly, hard to prove unless one had spent months tweeting, sh*tposting, blogging and giving speeches about it....
Still, legally, it's the thought and intent that counts! Admittedly, hard to prove unless one had spent months tweeting, sh*tposting, blogging and giving speeches about it....
Huh. Do you still compare it to an a******n?
Sep 8, 2021 13:06:07 #
debeda wrote:
Huh. Do you still compare it to an a******n?
I don't recall doing that. But I could try!?
Could you be more specific?
Sep 8, 2021 13:42:29 #
FallenOak
Loc: St George Utah
woodguru wrote:
One dem and you think that changes anything? Only in the "minds" of the believers...
Don't forget the A****a supporter that was there too.
This was predominately trump supporters looking to stop the steal...period.
and no number of dems or anyone else changes those dynamics
Don't forget the A****a supporter that was there too.
This was predominately trump supporters looking to stop the steal...period.
and no number of dems or anyone else changes those dynamics
Your last sentence perplexes me. Predominately means more than 50% are you telling me that over 50% were Dems because telling me that no number of Dems changes the dynamics could mean that 65% were Dem. Yes or No?
Sep 8, 2021 14:48:37 #
Singularity wrote:
I don't recall doing that. But I could try!?
Could you be more specific?
Could you be more specific?
Of course you don't remember.
Sep 8, 2021 19:52:00 #
debeda wrote:
Of course you don't remember.
Or you misremember, it was someone else or maybe you even made it up! All responses on OPP are recorded digitally and preserved in archives. You can dive in and check for yourself if you really are seriously concerned about something you think you might want to remember more clearly.
I sincerely don't know what you are referring to, here. It is only my felicity towards your general sweet nature and desire for your ongoing peace of mind that prompted my response in the first place.
You will have to be more specific if you actually do want to clear up some prior misunderstanding or explore an interesting comparison or analogy.
Sep 8, 2021 20:00:42 #
Singularity wrote:
Or you misremember, it was someone else or maybe y... (show quote)
Look, Singularity, you know, from many threads here, that a******n is a heartbreakingly hot button for me. We were in a discussion a couple of weeks ago, and I said something about the I**********n, and you compared/conflated that it was "like a******n". I did not misremember the exchange AND it really ticked me off. It was also the last time we interacted, by my design. SO. If you would like to look for that exchange and review your comments, you are welcome, of course, to do so. I personally don't want to correspond with someone who likes to push painful buttons knowingly.
Sep 8, 2021 20:17:57 #
debeda wrote:
Look, Singularity, you know, from many threads her... (show quote)
Then why did you bring it up? Really, what was your point, if not to challenge and discuss it in more detail in order to come to more understanding and consilience?
Again, I don't recall what you are referring to. But, if you have a point you don't want to make, you probably should consider not publishing it on the internet.
Sep 9, 2021 00:08:56 #
debeda wrote:
Absolutely right. If a million people gathered intent on an "I**********n", there would have been one. I have also heard persuasive reports, including one on the tucker carlson show, that FBI agents were also acting as provocateurs on J****** 6th. Crazy😳
Untouchables, no more!
Sep 9, 2021 00:11:01 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.