One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Rikers Island. Another example of Democratic Party incompetence.
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Aug 29, 2021 16:48:10   #
debeda
 
The Ms. wrote:
You forget….. EGO!


Yep, theres always that

Reply
Aug 29, 2021 17:14:22   #
son of witless
 
debeda wrote:
True😠


Once again my magical powers of shutting up Liberals without trying have proven themselves.

Reply
Aug 29, 2021 17:16:59   #
debeda
 
son of witless wrote:
Once again my magical powers of shutting up Liberals without trying have proven themselves.


It's your super power 🌞🌞🌞

Reply
 
 
Aug 29, 2021 17:18:08   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
son of witless wrote:
You really have to be a fool to ever v**e Democrat, but many still do.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/nyc-de-blasio-rikers-island-jail-corrections-union


And a fool to v**e repub.

Reply
Aug 29, 2021 17:34:52   #
son of witless
 
lpnmajor wrote:
And a fool to v**e repub.


A Republican did not try to defund the Police. A Republican is not in charge of Rikers Island. A Republican did not destroy the Southern Border. A Republican is not presiding over the worst military blunder since WW2.

Reply
Aug 29, 2021 18:27:19   #
The Ms.
 
son of witless wrote:
A Republican did not try to defund the Police. A Republican is not in charge of Rikers Island. A Republican did not destroy the Southern Border. A Republican is not presiding over the worst military blunder since WW2.


What did we blunder inWW2?

Reply
Aug 29, 2021 19:52:56   #
son of witless
 
The Ms. wrote:
What did we blunder inWW2?


Not being prepared for Pearl Harbor. Actually the Japanese didn't think up such an attack themselves. Torpedo plane attacks of that kind in a shallow harbor were considered impossible. The British proved the concept in an attack on the Italian Fleet in the Mediterranean. The Japanese were the only ones who took notice. There were warnings, but again everyone thought Pearl Harbor was too shallow for such an attack.

I saw a documentary on a British double agent who allegedly was the model for James Bond. He found evidence of Japan requesting information from German Intelligence on the British attack of the Italian Fleet. He reasoned that the Japanese were planning to attack Pearly Harbor. In the Documentary he told J. Edgar Hoover, but Hoover dismissed him. I don't know if that is true, but it made for good TV.

Reply
 
 
Aug 29, 2021 20:02:31   #
The Ms.
 
son of witless wrote:
Not being prepared for Pearl Harbor. Actually the Japanese didn't think up such an attack themselves. Torpedo plane attacks of that kind in a shallow harbor were considered impossible. The British proved the concept in an attack on the Italian Fleet in the Mediterranean. The Japanese were the only ones who took notice. There were warnings, but again everyone thought Pearl Harbor was too shallow for such an attack.

I saw a documentary on a British double agent who allegedly was the model for James Bond. He found evidence of Japan requesting information from German Intelligence on the British attack of the Italian Fleet. He reasoned that the Japanese were planning to attack Pearly Harbor. In the Documentary he told J. Edgar Hoover, but Hoover dismissed him. I don't know if that is true, but it made for good TV.
Not being prepared for Pearl Harbor. Actually the ... (show quote)

Reply
Aug 29, 2021 20:04:19   #
The Ms.
 
son of witless wrote:
Not being prepared for Pearl Harbor. Actually the Japanese didn't think up such an attack themselves. Torpedo plane attacks of that kind in a shallow harbor were considered impossible. The British proved the concept in an attack on the Italian Fleet in the Mediterranean. The Japanese were the only ones who took notice. There were warnings, but again everyone thought Pearl Harbor was too shallow for such an attack.

I saw a documentary on a British double agent who allegedly was the model for James Bond. He found evidence of Japan requesting information from German Intelligence on the British attack of the Italian Fleet. He reasoned that the Japanese were planning to attack Pearly Harbor. In the Documentary he told J. Edgar Hoover, but Hoover dismissed him. I don't know if that is true, but it made for good TV.
Not being prepared for Pearl Harbor. Actually the ... (show quote)


Good info! I didn’t know that Pearl Harbor was too shallow….. as always where there is will the bad guys manage to find a way🙏

Reply
Aug 30, 2021 17:34:30   #
son of witless
 
The Ms. wrote:
Good info! I didn’t know that Pearl Harbor was too shallow….. as always where there is will the bad guys manage to find a way🙏


The arms race in the 1930s and going into WW2 is fascinating. Great Britain, Germany, France, Japan, and the US all were ahead in things and behind in others. Torpedo technology coming out of WW1 really took off later on. Each nation had it's own ideas. The Japanese had their type 91 torpedo, which they used at Pearl Harbor. They used different types for their Submarines.

Going into WW2 the US had an horrendous submarine torpedo. In the first year of the war, American Submarines attacked Japanese merchant shipping and a large percentage of the torpedoes failed to detonate. When Sub Captains reported this, they were told they were making excuses for failure. The Bureau of Ordinance said it couldn't be their freaking torpedoes.

Not only were they clueless that their torpedoes were crap, they tried to stop anybody who tried to test and fix them. Bureaucracies are evil.

Reply
Aug 30, 2021 17:44:40   #
The Ms.
 
son of witless wrote:
The arms race in the 1930s and going into WW2 is fascinating. Great Britain, Germany, France, Japan, and the US all were ahead in things and behind in others. Torpedo technology coming out of WW1 really took off later on. Each nation had it's own ideas. The Japanese had their type 91 torpedo, which they used at Pearl Harbor. They used different types for their Submarines.

Going into WW2 the US had an horrendous submarine torpedo. In the first year of the war, American Submarines attacked Japanese merchant shipping and a large percentage of the torpedoes failed to detonate. When Sub Captains reported this, they were told they were making excuses for failure. The Bureau of Ordinance said it couldn't be their freaking torpedoes.

Not only were they clueless that their torpedoes were crap, they tried to stop anybody who tried to test and fix them. Bureaucracies are evil.
The arms race in the 1930s and going into WW2 is f... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Aug 30, 2021 17:47:50   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
lpnmajor wrote:
And a fool to v**e repub.


It appears you just proved a fool rather than disproved.

Reply
Aug 30, 2021 17:58:43   #
The Ms.
 
son of witless wrote:
The arms race in the 1930s and going into WW2 is fascinating. Great Britain, Germany, France, Japan, and the US all were ahead in things and behind in others. Torpedo technology coming out of WW1 really took off later on. Each nation had it's own ideas. The Japanese had their type 91 torpedo, which they used at Pearl Harbor. They used different types for their Submarines.

Going into WW2 the US had an horrendous submarine torpedo. In the first year of the war, American Submarines attacked Japanese merchant shipping and a large percentage of the torpedoes failed to detonate. When Sub Captains reported this, they were told they were making excuses for failure. The Bureau of Ordinance said it couldn't be their freaking torpedoes.

Not only were they clueless that their torpedoes were crap, they tried to stop anybody who tried to test and fix them. Bureaucracies are evil.
The arms race in the 1930s and going into WW2 is f... (show quote)


So we continue to do stupid…never learn! George Patton is my all time hero…. Love his style!! Alas, no more….

Reply
Aug 30, 2021 18:26:55   #
older and wiser
 
microphor wrote:
That's not a challenge, it's an impossibility!


Couldn't agree more!

Reply
Aug 30, 2021 18:34:30   #
son of witless
 
The Ms. wrote:
So we continue to do stupid…never learn! George Patton is my all time hero…. Love his style!! Alas, no more….


George S. Patton was a great field general. However, he could not ever be a Commander in Chief because he had no political sk**ls. Eisenhower was a good Commander in Chief because the job required that. Keeping FDR, Churchill, Patton, and Montgomery on the same page took a special kind of diplomat. As far as I know Eisenhower never had a major field command so he is lacking there.

The only American General I can think of that had both field sk**ls and headquarters sk**ls is Ulysses S. Grant. Other Union Generals were as great in the field. Sherman and Sheridan were like Patton. Tell them to destroy the enemy and they did it. However, only Grant had the political sk**ls to deal with the DC bureaucracy and the powerful incompetent officers in the Union Army who couldn't be fired.

Grant was the only general who Abraham Lincoln 100 % trusted. When the back stabbers came to Lincoln to get Grant fired for his drinking, Lincoln said, find out what kind of Whiskey he drinks and I will send some to my other generals. When they kept complaining, Lincoln said, I can't spare this man, he fights.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.