One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
Cruelty of this Government is UNBELIEVABLE!!....V******te or Die!!😡😡😡
Page <<first <prev 11 of 11
Aug 22, 2021 10:51:43   #
kemmer
 
IdahoLady wrote:
The democrats are just like the n**i. You need to learn history

Not the brightest firefly in the swarm, are you toots. 🙄

Reply
Aug 22, 2021 12:53:43   #
youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart
 
kemmer wrote:
Not the brightest firefly in the swarm, are you toots. 🙄


Hahaha. Kemmy, fireflies don't swarm, unlike you at the bathhouse, right.

Reply
Aug 22, 2021 13:26:16   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
youngwilliam wrote:
Hahaha. Kemmy, fireflies don't swarm, unlike you at the bathhouse, right.




Right on!!!

Reply
 
 
Aug 22, 2021 15:13:47   #
kemmer
 
youngwilliam wrote:
Hahaha. Kemmy, fireflies don't swarm, unlike you at the bathhouse, right.

I swear, you and Larry are really into that stuff aren’tcha dudette.
So 1983.

Reply
Aug 22, 2021 15:22:14   #
Big Kahuna
 
kemmer wrote:
I swear, you and Larry are really into that stuff aren’tcha dudette.
So 1983.


Bathhouses and glory holes are your thing kemmie boy, not mine. I love women too much.

Reply
Aug 22, 2021 15:53:09   #
youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart
 
kemmer wrote:
I swear, you and Larry are really into that stuff aren’tcha dudette.
So 1983.


That's cute kemmy, dudette. Talk about 1983. Is that how you talk to your boyfriends? Or do you call your little winky dudette?

Reply
Aug 23, 2021 10:54:52   #
KurtGodel7
 
peg w wrote:
Do you want to be the surgeon who operates on a patient and see that person die a week later of C***d because he has a suppressed i****e s****m? Quite frankly, if I was a doctor, I would refuse treatment to any patient who refused v******tion.
About the v*****es, We have given over 350, 000, 000 shots, just in the US. I'm sorry, but anyone who says this v*****e is untested faills to see that it passed quite a big test, on us, here for the past 8 mounths. It is safe and effective. Anyone who says otherwise doesn't belive in science.
Do you want to be the surgeon who operates on a pa... (show quote)


I’d like to focus on the last sentence of your post. Science is based on the following process. 1) Someone proposes a hypothesis, which is a reasonably intelligent guess. 2) Experiments are conducted to try to falsify the hypothesis. 3) The more the hypothesis can survive efforts at falsification the more evidence is in its favor.

Anyone engaging in lying, manipulation of data, censorship, or inserting a political agenda is embracing the opposite of science. It is always scientific, at least within reason, to say more data are needed. It is always anti-scientific, at least when data are limited, to declare that the science is settled and that those with opposing views must be censored or punished.

There are times when rejecting science in favor of ideology or religion might actually make sense. But it is far from obvious why a C****a shot (it is not a v*****e) should be one of those times.

Reply
 
 
Aug 23, 2021 11:07:07   #
debeda
 
KurtGodel7 wrote:
I’d like to focus on the last sentence of your post. Science is based on the following process. 1) Someone proposes a hypothesis, which is a reasonably intelligent guess. 2) Experiments are conducted to try to falsify the hypothesis. 3) The more the hypothesis can survive efforts at falsification the more evidence is in its favor.

Anyone engaging in lying, manipulation of data, censorship, or inserting a political agenda is embracing the opposite of science. It is always scientific, at least within reason, to say more data are needed. It is always anti-scientific, at least when data are limited, to declare that the science is settled and that those with opposing views must be censored or punished.

There are times when rejecting science in favor of ideology or religion might actually make sense. But it is far from obvious why a C****a shot (it is not a v*****e) should be one of those times.
I’d like to focus on the last sentence of your pos... (show quote)


👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

Reply
Aug 23, 2021 11:25:57   #
kemmer
 
drlarrygino wrote:
Bathhouses and glory holes are your thing kemmie boy, not mine. I love women too much.

So in other words, your politics are indefensible and all you’ve got are person attacks?

Reply
Aug 23, 2021 11:31:14   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
KurtGodel7 wrote:
I’d like to focus on the last sentence of your post. Science is based on the following process. 1) Someone proposes a hypothesis, which is a reasonably intelligent guess. 2) Experiments are conducted to try to falsify the hypothesis. 3) The more the hypothesis can survive efforts at falsification the more evidence is in its favor.

Anyone engaging in lying, manipulation of data, censorship, or inserting a political agenda is embracing the opposite of science. It is always scientific, at least within reason, to say more data are needed. It is always anti-scientific, at least when data are limited, to declare that the science is settled and that those with opposing views must be censored or punished.

There are times when rejecting science in favor of ideology or religion might actually make sense. But it is far from obvious why a C****a shot (it is not a v*****e) should be one of those times.
I’d like to focus on the last sentence of your pos... (show quote)



Reply
Aug 23, 2021 12:27:47   #
youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart
 
kemmer wrote:
So in other words, your politics are indefensible and all you’ve got are person attacks?


No, those are your words. And your hypocrisy is hilarious.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 11 of 11
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.