Too stupid to live: "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.” — Martin Luther King Those words, after all, are from 1963. Back...

moldyoldy

"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.” — Martin Luther King

Those words, after all, are from 1963. Back then, the idea of U.S. citizens and lawmakers attacking their own democracy would have been unthinkable, flouting precautions in a deadly p******c unimaginable, ignoring a threat to our very planet inconceivable. Of course, back then, information came through a few reliable conduits: Walter Cronkite, Chet Huntley, David Brinkley, the local paper.

There was no social media. The production and distribution of information had not yet become the province of any and everybody.

Things have changed. The unthinkable, the unimaginable and the inconceivable are hard upon us. We face not one, but three simultaneous existential emergencies, and while each is distinct, it’s time we understood that, ultimately, they are not different threats at all, but rather different manifestations of the same threat. Meaning that the i**********n crisis, the C****-** crisis and the c*****e-c****e crisis are really, at bottom, just facets of a misinformation crisis.

Leonard Pitts wearing glasses and looking at the camera: Leonard Pitts.© Provided by Tribune Content Agency Leonard Pitts.
If you consider how belief in risibly false information ginned up by social media — e.g., Donald T***p w*n, v*****es magnetize skin, cold snaps disprove g****l w*****g — has impeded if not paralyzed our response to these and other issues, the t***h of it becomes evident. Cronkite, Huntley and Brinkley are long dead, the local paper just a shadow of itself. Social media purport to fill the void and as a direct result, misinformation has reached critical levels.

It’s not that no one saw this coming. Warnings go back at least two decades, including in this very space. But the threat seemed so theoretical. Who knew that it would have such real and profound effects? Who knew it would cleave this country — this planet — like an axe, splitting the informed off so decisively from the proudly misinformed, the adherents to crackpot theories and screwball beliefs that would have been laughed off the public stage in 1963 but that, in 2021, find strength in numbers and validation online? And that now emerge as a clear and present danger.

Just this week, for instance, a United Nations panel issued a report warning that c*****e c****e has brought us to the point of catastrophe: “code red for humanity.” It’s a t***h underscored by our own eyes, by the hundred-year events that now happen every year: devastating floods, blistering heat, raging fires, rampaging storms. The damage, we are told, is irreversible. We can only mitigate it.

You’d think such a dire prognosis would leave us united on the need for immediate action, but Fox “News” saw little to worry about, bringing on climate denier Marc Morano to assure viewers that the U.N. just wants to take their cars. “You’re being conned,” he said, “if you’re falling for this U.N. report.”

And so it goes.

The need to teach our children well — media literacy and critical thinking, in particular — has never felt more urgent. Indeed, it is not too much to call it a matter of survival. After all, the i**********n crisis threatens our country, the C***D crisis threatens our health and the climate crisis threatens the only planet we’ve got. But the misinformation crisis either caused or exacerbated them all. So the obvious epitaph if we do not survive these challenges would be ignominious, but fair:

Too stupid to live.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/leonard-pitts-jr-too-stupid-to-live/ar-AANaTkM?ocid=msedgntp

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

moldyoldy wrote:

"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.” — Martin Luther King

Those words, after all, are from 1963. Back then, the idea of U.S. citizens and lawmakers attacking their own democracy would have been unthinkable, flouting precautions in a deadly p******c unimaginable, ignoring a threat to our very planet inconceivable. Of course, back then, information came through a few reliable conduits: Walter Cronkite, Chet Huntley, David Brinkley, the local paper.

There was no social media. The production and distribution of information had not yet become the province of any and everybody.

Things have changed. The unthinkable, the unimaginable and the inconceivable are hard upon us. We face not one, but three simultaneous existential emergencies, and while each is distinct, it’s time we understood that, ultimately, they are not different threats at all, but rather different manifestations of the same threat. Meaning that the i**********n crisis, the C****-** crisis and the c*****e-c****e crisis are really, at bottom, just facets of a misinformation crisis.

Leonard Pitts wearing glasses and looking at the camera: Leonard Pitts.© Provided by Tribune Content Agency Leonard Pitts.
If you consider how belief in risibly false information ginned up by social media — e.g., Donald T***p w*n, v*****es magnetize skin, cold snaps disprove g****l w*****g — has impeded if not paralyzed our response to these and other issues, the t***h of it becomes evident. Cronkite, Huntley and Brinkley are long dead, the local paper just a shadow of itself. Social media purport to fill the void and as a direct result, misinformation has reached critical levels.

It’s not that no one saw this coming. Warnings go back at least two decades, including in this very space. But the threat seemed so theoretical. Who knew that it would have such real and profound effects? Who knew it would cleave this country — this planet — like an axe, splitting the informed off so decisively from the proudly misinformed, the adherents to crackpot theories and screwball beliefs that would have been laughed off the public stage in 1963 but that, in 2021, find strength in numbers and validation online? And that now emerge as a clear and present danger.

Just this week, for instance, a United Nations panel issued a report warning that c*****e c****e has brought us to the point of catastrophe: “code red for humanity.” It’s a t***h underscored by our own eyes, by the hundred-year events that now happen every year: devastating floods, blistering heat, raging fires, rampaging storms. The damage, we are told, is irreversible. We can only mitigate it.

You’d think such a dire prognosis would leave us united on the need for immediate action, but Fox “News” saw little to worry about, bringing on climate denier Marc Morano to assure viewers that the U.N. just wants to take their cars. “You’re being conned,” he said, “if you’re falling for this U.N. report.”

And so it goes.

The need to teach our children well — media literacy and critical thinking, in particular — has never felt more urgent. Indeed, it is not too much to call it a matter of survival. After all, the i**********n crisis threatens our country, the C***D crisis threatens our health and the climate crisis threatens the only planet we’ve got. But the misinformation crisis either caused or exacerbated them all. So the obvious epitaph if we do not survive these challenges would be ignominious, but fair:

Too stupid to live.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/leonard-pitts-jr-too-stupid-to-live/ar-AANaTkM?ocid=msedgntp

"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous t... (show quote)

Aint no reason to k**l yourself, just unplug that porn box that makes you think stupid. ..... and then display it here.

moldyoldy

Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:

Aint no reason to k**l yourself, just unplug that porn box that makes you think stupid. ..... and then display it here.

Abbot and desantis need a little wokeness. They are k*****g people.

vernon

moldyoldy wrote:

Abbot and desantis need a little wokeness. They are k*****g people.

Bullshot! The v***s is being distributed by the one and only dim biden.Now anyone believing the crap the left puts out are to stupid to live.

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

moldyoldy wrote:

"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.” — Martin Luther King

Those words, after all, are from 1963. Back then, the idea of U.S. citizens and lawmakers attacking their own democracy would have been unthinkable, flouting precautions in a deadly p******c unimaginable, ignoring a threat to our very planet inconceivable. Of course, back then, information came through a few reliable conduits: Walter Cronkite, Chet Huntley, David Brinkley, the local paper.

There was no social media. The production and distribution of information had not yet become the province of any and everybody.

Things have changed. The unthinkable, the unimaginable and the inconceivable are hard upon us. We face not one, but three simultaneous existential emergencies, and while each is distinct, it’s time we understood that, ultimately, they are not different threats at all, but rather different manifestations of the same threat. Meaning that the i**********n crisis, the C****-** crisis and the c*****e-c****e crisis are really, at bottom, just facets of a misinformation crisis.

Leonard Pitts wearing glasses and looking at the camera: Leonard Pitts.© Provided by Tribune Content Agency Leonard Pitts.
If you consider how belief in risibly false information ginned up by social media — e.g., Donald T***p w*n, v*****es magnetize skin, cold snaps disprove g****l w*****g — has impeded if not paralyzed our response to these and other issues, the t***h of it becomes evident. Cronkite, Huntley and Brinkley are long dead, the local paper just a shadow of itself. Social media purport to fill the void and as a direct result, misinformation has reached critical levels.

It’s not that no one saw this coming. Warnings go back at least two decades, including in this very space. But the threat seemed so theoretical. Who knew that it would have such real and profound effects? Who knew it would cleave this country — this planet — like an axe, splitting the informed off so decisively from the proudly misinformed, the adherents to crackpot theories and screwball beliefs that would have been laughed off the public stage in 1963 but that, in 2021, find strength in numbers and validation online? And that now emerge as a clear and present danger.

Just this week, for instance, a United Nations panel issued a report warning that c*****e c****e has brought us to the point of catastrophe: “code red for humanity.” It’s a t***h underscored by our own eyes, by the hundred-year events that now happen every year: devastating floods, blistering heat, raging fires, rampaging storms. The damage, we are told, is irreversible. We can only mitigate it.

You’d think such a dire prognosis would leave us united on the need for immediate action, but Fox “News” saw little to worry about, bringing on climate denier Marc Morano to assure viewers that the U.N. just wants to take their cars. “You’re being conned,” he said, “if you’re falling for this U.N. report.”

And so it goes.

The need to teach our children well — media literacy and critical thinking, in particular — has never felt more urgent. Indeed, it is not too much to call it a matter of survival. After all, the i**********n crisis threatens our country, the C***D crisis threatens our health and the climate crisis threatens the only planet we’ve got. But the misinformation crisis either caused or exacerbated them all. So the obvious epitaph if we do not survive these challenges would be ignominious, but fair:

Too stupid to live.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/leonard-pitts-jr-too-stupid-to-live/ar-AANaTkM?ocid=msedgntp

"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous t... (show quote)

Poor moldy you old sod.
Hook, line and sinker. You even broke the rod.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

moldyoldy

vernon wrote:

Bullshot! The v***s is being distributed by the one and only dim biden.Now anyone believing the crap the left puts out are to stupid to live.

What a ridiculous comment.

woodguru

vernon wrote:

Bullshot! The v***s is being distributed by the one and only dim biden.Now anyone believing the crap the left puts out are to stupid to live.

Of course, that explains the great states of Texas and Florida leading the country in C***d hospitalization...it's Biden's fault.

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

woodguru wrote:

Of course, that explains the great states of Texas and Florida leading the country in C***d hospitalization...it's Biden's fault.

Well duh. 100's of thousands coming across the border, spread throughout the US bringing who knows what in. Glad we are not as blind as you. Poor old sod.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

woodguru wrote:

Of course, that explains the great states of Texas and Florida leading the country in C***d hospitalization...it's Biden's fault.

Despite ‘Delta’ Alarmism, US C***D Deaths Are at Lowest Level Since March 2020, Harvard and Stanford Professors Explain

If you judged the US’s current C****-** situation only by the headlines, you’d come away thinking that we’re spiraling back into p******c disaster. Localities like Los Angeles County and St. Louis have reimposed mask mandates on their citizens, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention just revised its “guidance” to say that, actually, fully v******ted individuals should still wear masks in certain situations. Meanwhile, mainstream media coverage of the rise of the “Delta variant” is soaked in alarmism.

Yet at the same time that all this alarm is mounting, the actual number of C****-** deaths is at a nadir. Harvard Medical School Professor Martin Kulldorff pointed this out on Twitter, writing that “In [the] USA, C***D mortality is now the lowest since the start of the p******c in March 2020.”

He shared this graph from OurWorldInData which clearly shows how C***D deaths per million are at, relatively speaking, extreme lows. Far more people were dying from C****-** months ago as we were winding down restrictions than are dying today as some call to reinstate them.

Now, some would cite rising C****-** case counts or hospitalizations in certain parts of the country as evidence that the p******c is indeed once again spiraling out of control. But many C****-** cases recorded as positive are either asymptomatic or come with very mild symptoms—especially the cases confirmed among v******ted individuals—so high case counts are not necessarily proof of a serious problem. Hospitalizations are concerning, yes, but primarily insofar as they lead to high numbers of deaths, which, thankfully, is not the case so far with the Delta variant.

Others would say that deaths are a “lagging indicator” that come in several weeks after the increased spread of the disease. But the Delta variant has been spreading in the US for months now, and deaths have remained relatively flat, in part due to widespread v******tion.

“It is striking that C***D mortality is at such low levels despite the fact that we are seeing an increase in cases of late,” Stanford Professor of Medicine Dr. Jay Bhattacharya tells FEE. “By immunizing the elderly and many other vulnerable people, we have provided them with excellent protection against severe disease in case they get infected. Also contributing is widespread natural immunity from recovered C***D patients. Though cases may rise, deaths will no longer follow in proportion. We have effectively defanged the disease with our successful v******tion rollout.”

So, there’s simply no reason to expect the long downward trend in deaths shown in the above graph to suddenly spike upwards. And we can’t make public policy based on worst-case scenarios.

That’s right: despite all the alarmism and clamor for renewed restrictions on our liberty, there’s not really been a resurgence in the state of the C****-** crisis itself.

“We should be declaring a great and resounding success,” Bhattacharya told FEE in conclusion. “The C***D emergency is over. We still need to take C***D seriously, and there are still vulnerable people here and abroad left to v******te. But we can start to treat it as one disease among many that afflict people rather than an all-consuming threat.”

Of course, proponents of big government and government officials themselves will be the last ones to acknowledge the reality that the most dangerous phase of this p******c has long since come to an end in the US. Why? Because the rhetoric of “emergency” and “crisis” is the government’s favorite tool to use in expanding and maintaining its power over our lives.

“‘Emergencies’ have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have eroded,” as Nobel-Prize-winning economist Friedrich Hayek put it. “And once they are suspended it is not difficult for anyone who has assumed emergency powers to see to it that the emergency will persist.”

Examples of this timeless t***h abound throughout history up until present day: from the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II to the now-permanent infringements on our civil liberties after 9/11 to the sweeping expansion of government control during the C****-** p******c.

But, whether politicians like it or not, the C****-** crisis is largely over. So don’t fall for cynical arguments from power-hungry individuals who want their “emergency” powers to become permanent.

moldyoldy

Blade_Runner wrote:

Despite ‘Delta’ Alarmism, US C***D Deaths Are at Lowest Level Since March 2020, Harvard and Stanford Professors Explain

If you judged the US’s current C****-** situation only by the headlines, you’d come away thinking that we’re spiraling back into p******c disaster. Localities like Los Angeles County and St. Louis have reimposed mask mandates on their citizens, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention just revised its “guidance” to say that, actually, fully v******ted individuals should still wear masks in certain situations. Meanwhile, mainstream media coverage of the rise of the “Delta variant” is soaked in alarmism.

Yet at the same time that all this alarm is mounting, the actual number of C****-** deaths is at a nadir. Harvard Medical School Professor Martin Kulldorff pointed this out on Twitter, writing that “In [the] USA, C***D mortality is now the lowest since the start of the p******c in March 2020.”

He shared this graph from OurWorldInData which clearly shows how C***D deaths per million are at, relatively speaking, extreme lows. Far more people were dying from C****-** months ago as we were winding down restrictions than are dying today as some call to reinstate them.

Now, some would cite rising C****-** case counts or hospitalizations in certain parts of the country as evidence that the p******c is indeed once again spiraling out of control. But many C****-** cases recorded as positive are either asymptomatic or come with very mild symptoms—especially the cases confirmed among v******ted individuals—so high case counts are not necessarily proof of a serious problem. Hospitalizations are concerning, yes, but primarily insofar as they lead to high numbers of deaths, which, thankfully, is not the case so far with the Delta variant.

Others would say that deaths are a “lagging indicator” that come in several weeks after the increased spread of the disease. But the Delta variant has been spreading in the US for months now, and deaths have remained relatively flat, in part due to widespread v******tion.

“It is striking that C***D mortality is at such low levels despite the fact that we are seeing an increase in cases of late,” Stanford Professor of Medicine Dr. Jay Bhattacharya tells FEE. “By immunizing the elderly and many other vulnerable people, we have provided them with excellent protection against severe disease in case they get infected. Also contributing is widespread natural immunity from recovered C***D patients. Though cases may rise, deaths will no longer follow in proportion. We have effectively defanged the disease with our successful v******tion rollout.”

So, there’s simply no reason to expect the long downward trend in deaths shown in the above graph to suddenly spike upwards. And we can’t make public policy based on worst-case scenarios.

That’s right: despite all the alarmism and clamor for renewed restrictions on our liberty, there’s not really been a resurgence in the state of the C****-** crisis itself.

“We should be declaring a great and resounding success,” Bhattacharya told FEE in conclusion. “The C***D emergency is over. We still need to take C***D seriously, and there are still vulnerable people here and abroad left to v******te. But we can start to treat it as one disease among many that afflict people rather than an all-consuming threat.”

Of course, proponents of big government and government officials themselves will be the last ones to acknowledge the reality that the most dangerous phase of this p******c has long since come to an end in the US. Why? Because the rhetoric of “emergency” and “crisis” is the government’s favorite tool to use in expanding and maintaining its power over our lives.

“‘Emergencies’ have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have eroded,” as Nobel-Prize-winning economist Friedrich Hayek put it. “And once they are suspended it is not difficult for anyone who has assumed emergency powers to see to it that the emergency will persist.”

Examples of this timeless t***h abound throughout history up until present day: from the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II to the now-permanent infringements on our civil liberties after 9/11 to the sweeping expansion of government control during the C****-** p******c.

But, whether politicians like it or not, the C****-** crisis is largely over. So don’t fall for cynical arguments from power-hungry individuals who want their “emergency” powers to become permanent.

i b Despite ‘Delta’ Alarmism, US C***D Deaths Ar... (show quote)

So, you could say that a healthier segment of society is getting the v***s now. They will fair better but the chance of sharing the v***s with the vulnerable is still a problem.

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

moldyoldy wrote:

So, you could say that a healthier segment of society is getting the v***s now. They will fair better but the chance of sharing the v***s with the vulnerable is still a problem.

Who are the vulnerable, v****d or unv****d? Both equally susceptible to contracting and t***smitting the v***s. This v***s can be carried by animals as well as humans. It will never go away despite what the liars in the White House and MSM say.

moldyoldy

youngwilliam wrote:

Who are the vulnerable, v****d or unv****d? Both equally susceptible to contracting and t***smitting the v***s. This v***s can be carried by animals as well as humans. It will never go away despite what the liars in the White House and MSM say.

If everyone is v******ted the mutations should stop.

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

moldyoldy wrote:

If everyone is v******ted the mutations should stop.

Can you not read? Animals are carriers. You going to jab every living creature on earth with something that not a v*****e. It is experimental drugs. Can you say dense. Sheesh.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

moldyoldy wrote:

Abbot and desantis need a little wokeness. They are k*****g people.

Highest death rate per 100,000 ain't Florida or Texas. Maybe ask why your great leader opened the border to unv******ted i******s and is turning them loose upon the land.

And don't lie and claim they are being v******ted, tested or monitored.

That would be an utter lie just like when CNN claims it to be so.

And the bozo is flying then in the night into states without their knowledge or permission.

moldyoldy

youngwilliam wrote:

Can you not read? Animals are carriers. You going to jab every living creature on earth with something that not a v*****e. It is experimental drugs. Can you say dense. Sheesh.

The original v***s came from an animal that someone ate. Some animals have caught the v***s, it’s a rare thing.