Biden is not Obama (Page 3): You’re just so much more informed or deluded than everyone else eh?

Wonttakeitanymore

slatten49 wrote:

Fellow Vet, slow down and re-read carefully my previous post to you, or work on your comprehension sk**ls.

You’re just so much more informed or deluded than everyone else eh?

Wonttakeitanymore

slatten49 wrote:

Not done very well, my friend, or, you are simply reluctant to accept my answer. Again, in bold letters...

"NO", but....the following pertains to The Donald's time in office.

https://www.yourtango.com/2017304489/videos-donald-trump-sundowning-dementia-alzheimers-videos-tweets-conspiracy

https://www.bing.com/search?q=examplesoftrumpsdementia&cvid=5bd0c5b8372c4eccb5895bd6f382cc3c&aqs=edge..69i57.7381j0j1&pglt=43&FORM=ANSPA1&PC=HCTS

Deflection is all u Trump h**ers have!

Wonttakeitanymore

slatten49 wrote:

Is it that much trouble for the two of you to understand that I am making as clear as possible my answer to American Vet's question: "Are you concerned about Biden's pretty apparent descent into dementia

"

We are concerned for delusional zombies that just don’t get it! E******n s****n Biden plant

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

son of witless wrote:

Recently I got into it with a couple on your side on that very subject. They suggested that perhaps my need for brevity is because I do not express myself very well. Perhaps.

I find no fault with your ability to express yourself. I hear the opposite with my antagonists, as they believe me to be too wordy and/or of using too many big words.

One claims I use 33-letter words.

I challenged him to come up with one instance of my using a word with 1/2 or even 1/3 that many. He won't because he can't.

Quite frankly, I don't believe I know any 33-letter words.

son of witless

slatten49 wrote:

I find no fault with your ability to express yours... (show quote)

It is not the long words that I criticize some for. It is the long paragraphs. If you notice I try to keep my paragraphs short. Sometimes that results in too many paragraphs if I really get rolling. If you try to make too many points in one post, the reader will just roll their eyes and not read it.

I prefer many short back and forths to a couple of long posts. It mirrors a real conversation as opposed to two people making speeches to one another.

Ideologically I do not expect to convince too many, but I keep trying to set some rules of engagement so that this isn't just a pissing contest.

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

son of witless wrote:

It is not the long words that I criticize some fo... (show quote)

I've found you set a reasonable standard. Unfortunately, others' exchanges still turn into pissing contests.

FallenOak Loc: St George Utah

slatten49 wrote:

Fortunately, The President has not progressed as much as did Reagan and Trump...our last two over 70 CICs.

https://www.inquirer.com/philly/blogs/healthcare/Medical-Mystery-Did-Reagan-have-Alzheimers-while-president.html

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bannon-believed-trump-had-early-stage-dementia/ar-BB1dJOUq

Would it not be great if all our candidates for leadership jobs have to pass medical and acuity tests before being allowed to run for such important offices?

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

FallenOak wrote:

Would it not be great if all our candidates for leadership jobs have to pass medical and acuity tests before being allowed to run for such important offices?

It's certainly reasonable to think so. Personally, I think there should be a cut-off age to run for president the first time...say 67 or so. But, that would be hard to do.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

slatten49 wrote:

It's certainly reasonable to think so. Personally, I think there should be a cut-off age to run for president the first time...say 67 or so. But, that would be hard to do.

The same for SCOTUS.

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

dtucker300 wrote:

The same for SCOTUS.

Tuck, I trust you're talking about retirement and not 1st time entry onto the Supreme Court. I actually prefer older, experienced SCOTUS members, yet would like retirement for them by 80.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

American Vet

slatten49 wrote:

Not done very well, my friend, or, you are simply reluctant to accept my answer. Again, in bold letters...

"NO", but....the following pertains to The Donald's time in office.

https://www.yourtango.com/2017304489/videos-donald-trump-sundowning-dementia-alzheimers-videos-tweets-conspiracy

https://www.bing.com/search?q=examplesoftrumpsdementia&cvid=5bd0c5b8372c4eccb5895bd6f382cc3c&aqs=edge..69i57.7381j0j1&pglt=43&FORM=ANSPA1&PC=HCTS

Funny you keep going back to President Trump. He is history. He is not the President.

But, it does seem problematic that you are not worried about biden (our current President)and his pretty obvious slide into dementia.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

American Vet wrote:

Funny you keep going back to President Trump. He is history. He is not the President.

But, it does seem problematic that you are not worried about biden (our current President)and his pretty obvious slide into dementia.

IMPEACH BIDEN NOW!