fullspinzoo wrote:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/02/hubris_elites_brazenly_gloat_they_r****d_e******n__and_why_thats_good_news_for_us.html
you really need help if you still believe that the e******n was r****d heck perhaps the 2016 e******n was r****d then by our own standards
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/02/hubris_elites_brazenly_gloat_they_r****d_e******n__and_why_thats_good_news_for_us.html
Is it c***ting if one changes the rules during the game to encourage others to commit fraud or is one just following the rules? Universal mail in b****ts, unsecured drop boxes, weaken rules on signature matches, etc make it easier to commit fraud and get away with it. Democrats think they weren't c***ting because they changed the rules then followed them. Now democrats want to make those rules they changed, some illegally, permanent.
jimpack123 wrote:
you really need help if you still believe that the e******n was r****d heck perhaps the 2016 e******n was r****d then by our own standards
Why is it that you've been brainwashed to think everything you do is on the up and up? "Fair and square"? You are either very naive or not too bright. Not up on the news much are you?
jimpack123 wrote:
you really need help if you still believe that the e******n was r****d heck perhaps the 2016 e******n was r****d then by our own standards
You are led around by the hand and are so naive. You think your party is honest, t***sparent and all the other adjectives that describe your party as trustworthy. On a scale of 1 to 100, what number would you give your party in that category????? 100 being very trustworthy, honest, t***sparent?
jimpack123 wrote:
you really need help if you still believe that the e******n was r****d heck perhaps the 2016 e******n was r****d then by our own standards
Congrats! Wondered who'd be first to make a childish comment and deflect.
JFlorio wrote:
Congrats! Wondered who'd be first to make a childish comment and deflect.
You can always count on Jim Pack to come through. If the number on my integrity scale is at a point or higher, there is no reason to even talk to these people. I'm wasting my breath. Jim Pack thinks I need help because I think Trump is still in the running. Call it eternal optimism, but that's just me. Never give up, persistent....that's one of the characteristics I like about Trump. Have a great day, sir!
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/02/hubris_elites_brazenly_gloat_they_r****d_e******n__and_why_thats_good_news_for_us.html
“American Thinker” is itself the very picture of hubris.
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
kemmer wrote:
“American Thinker” is itself the very picture of hubris.
American Thinker is just discussing the article that was published in the liberal Time Magazine. The fact is some manipulated the e******n process and rules and then are gloating about how successful they were.
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
Pish! Bury your head in the sand.
jimpack123 wrote:
you really need help if you still believe that the e******n was r****d heck perhaps the 2016 e******n was r****d then by our own standards
If you are still in denial, { look at all the irrefutable evidence}....You desperately need help!
no doubt about the criminaLITY OF THE DEMONCRAT PARTY!
jimpack123 wrote:
you really need help if you still believe that the e******n was r****d heck perhaps the 2016 e******n was r****d then by our own standards
You will see! You need lots of help if you really believe bribem won!!! So sad zombie
jimpack123 wrote:
you really need help if you still believe that the e******n was r****d heck perhaps the 2016 e******n was r****d then by our own standards
And you need help if you think 358 counties can v**e at 100 to 125% of registered v**ers. Lucky to get 70% turnout. Also dead people can’t v**e
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.