One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Investigation Is All About Who Was Involved In Obstructing Help For The C*****l P****e...Pelosi Included
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jul 28, 2021 15:16:45   #
woodguru
 
The right is calling out for investigating what Pelosi's part in inadequate capital security, and quite frankly even a moron could figure out that if she interfered with or obstructed anything to do with capital security it will be there front and center...

...meanwhile so will every single call and order made from the bottom up and the top down...by the time this is done we will know from days and weeks in advance what took place in terms of getting less security and having reserve police and national guard stand down as opposed to being crisis ready.

Trump saw the storming of the capital and did not want "his" loyal supporters attacked and arrested, the bottom line is that the orders for backup were to come from him and those did not come.

We will have a clear picture of every call made directly to the white house and every associated pentagon and security entity, who made calls and what were they asking for, who took them and who they called or did not act upon.

By the time this is done we will have a clear understanding of what trump didn't do as a dereliction of his duties as president because there were his people attacking the capital in order to stop the formal act of installing the new president.

If Pelosi had a part in this it will come out...

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 15:22:50   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
woodguru wrote:
The right is calling out for investigating what Pelosi's part in inadequate capital security, and quite frankly even a moron could figure out that if she interfered with or obstructed anything to do with capital security it will be there front and center...

...meanwhile so will every single call and order made from the bottom up and the top down...by the time this is done we will know from days and weeks in advance what took place in terms of getting less security and having reserve police and national guard stand down as opposed to being crisis ready.

Trump saw the storming of the capital and did not want "his" loyal supporters attacked and arrested, the bottom line is that the orders for backup were to come from him and those did not come.

We will have a clear picture of every call made directly to the white house and every associated pentagon and security entity, who made calls and what were they asking for, who took them and who they called or did not act upon.

By the time this is done we will have a clear understanding of what trump didn't do as a dereliction of his duties as president because there were his people attacking the capital in order to stop the formal act of installing the new president.

If Pelosi had a part in this it will come out...
The right is calling out for investigating what Pe... (show quote)


We will not have a clear picture because we will never see all the evidence. We will only see things that support Dem narritive re Trump.

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 15:36:41   #
Voiceodppl
 
Who murderedhh Ashli Babbitt? Who told police to let people in? What conversations took place before 1*6? We’re any “ i**********nist” identified as B*M or A****a? If so, who organized them? Let the c*****l p****e board be put on the stand(under oath) and let people who want to know the t***h( not Kinzinger) ask the hard questions

Reply
 
 
Jul 28, 2021 15:44:01   #
Liberty Tree
 
microphor wrote:
We will not have a clear picture because we will never see all the evidence. We will only see things that support Dem narritive re Trump.


Pelosi has already determined how the final report will be written.

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 16:06:08   #
woodguru
 
microphor wrote:
We will not have a clear picture because we will never see all the evidence. We will only see things that support Dem narritive re Trump.


You are going to see hearings done in real time, whoever held back police support will be outed, and unlike trump administration investigations, the DOJ will not be there to run interference for trump people this time around, the DOJ formally spelled out that there will be no executive privilege exerted to hide damning testimony behind. The DOJ will be there in support of the House commission, not to obstruct it.

This is a different type of house investigation than we have had to watch the last decade or more that have been about obstruction and B******i style witch hunts, this one can do it's job without interference from both the white house and DOJ

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 16:31:50   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
woodguru wrote:
The right is calling out for investigating what Pelosi's part in inadequate capital security, and quite frankly even a moron could figure out that if she interfered with or obstructed anything to do with capital security it will be there front and center...

...meanwhile so will every single call and order made from the bottom up and the top down...by the time this is done we will know from days and weeks in advance what took place in terms of getting less security and having reserve police and national guard stand down as opposed to being crisis ready.

Trump saw the storming of the capital and did not want "his" loyal supporters attacked and arrested, the bottom line is that the orders for backup were to come from him and those did not come.

We will have a clear picture of every call made directly to the white house and every associated pentagon and security entity, who made calls and what were they asking for, who took them and who they called or did not act upon.

By the time this is done we will have a clear understanding of what trump didn't do as a dereliction of his duties as president because there were his people attacking the capital in order to stop the formal act of installing the new president.

If Pelosi had a part in this it will come out...
The right is calling out for investigating what Pe... (show quote)


I guess what was supposed to happen, was deploying the army with orders to shoot to k**l anyone that made it past the barricades.

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 16:37:08   #
woodguru
 
lpnmajor wrote:
I guess what was supposed to happen, was deploying the army with orders to shoot to k**l anyone that made it past the barricades.


No, but stick your head through a broken window or door you bet your fanny.

Reply
 
 
Jul 28, 2021 16:42:07   #
Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
 
woodguru wrote:
You are going to see hearings done in real time, whoever held back police support will be outed, and unlike trump administration investigations, the DOJ will not be there to run interference for trump people this time around, the DOJ formally spelled out that there will be no executive privilege exerted to hide damning testimony behind. The DOJ will be there in support of the House commission, not to obstruct it.

This is a different type of house investigation than we have had to watch the last decade or more that have been about obstruction and B******i style witch hunts, this one can do it's job without interference from both the white house and DOJ
You are going to see hearings done in real time, w... (show quote)


Time will tell how this unfolds. Hopefully it is investigation but the first day says otherwise. I feel for the four witnesses and what they experienced but it seemed that they were chosen to present a certain limited perspective to elicit a predetermined emotional response.

One witness actually said that there were 9000 terrorists, that's right 9000 terrorists, storming the capital that was protected by 175 police officers. The term terrorists was used over and over to push the narrative.

Another police officer said that people in the crowd helped him back to the tunnel where the other police were, but, that point was skimmed over and never repeated by the media because, presumably, it went against the narrative. I guess there were some pretty nice "terrorists" mixed in there.

The democrat opening statement stated that nine people died. That is just an outright lie and misrepresentation of facts.

All the videos shown seemed to be selected to paint a particular extreme narrative. None represent the entire picture of what actually happened.

If this is a different type of investigation in search of t***h as you say then it is a very poor start to that end.

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 16:42:51   #
woodguru
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Pelosi has already determined how the final report will be written.


There's where you are wrong, the difference being hearings will be done in public view, not in secret like republicans like it to where they can gag order dems in the hearings and say they are classified.

Trump staffers will be grilled in public view, if they perjure themselves they will likely be prosecuted. The DOJ has already formally said that there will be no executive privilege to keep them from answering questions.

My guess is that current Biden Intelligence and pentagon people that worked under trump will come under fire for not standing up to trump.

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 16:52:32   #
woodguru
 
Strycker wrote:
Time will tell how this unfolds. Hopefully it is investigation but the first day says otherwise. I feel for the four witnesses and what they experienced but it seemed that they were chosen to present a certain limited perspective to elicit a predetermined emotional response.

One witness actually said that there were 9000 terrorists, that's right 9000 terrorists, storming the capital that was protected by 175 police officers. The term terrorists was used over and over to push the narrative.
Time will tell how this unfolds. Hopefully it is i... (show quote)

That narrative needed to start the proceedings because of the incessant right narrative that this was a peaceful event, so much love...it was terrorism, it was organized to stop the proceedings. Had some of the people seen their agendas play out there would have been hostages of not deaths. There were people carrying large numbers of zip cuffs, you think those gallows that had been put up for Pence would have not been used had they got their hands on him?

The definition of terrorism was spelled out, and this was terrorism, as is threats against every republican that goes against trump is currently experiencing.

This was terrorism, get used to it being called that, and get used to the idea of anyone talking about and planning terrorist acts being formally designated as d******c t*******ts...with all of the expanded surveillance and corresponding seizures of weapons that goes with being called terrorists, same as Muslim terrorists except the home grown version that causes more harm in this country than does muslims.

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 17:25:15   #
Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
 
woodguru wrote:
That narrative needed to start the proceedings because of the incessant right narrative that this was a peaceful event, so much love...it was terrorism, it was organized to stop the proceedings. Had some of the people seen their agendas play out there would have been hostages of not deaths. There were people carrying large numbers of zip cuffs, you think those gallows that had been put up for Pence would have not been used had they got their hands on him?

The definition of terrorism was spelled out, and this was terrorism, as is threats against every republican that goes against trump is currently experiencing.

This was terrorism, get used to it being called that, and get used to the idea of anyone talking about and planning terrorist acts being formally designated as d******c t*******ts...with all of the expanded surveillance and corresponding seizures of weapons that goes with being called terrorists, same as Muslim terrorists except the home grown version that causes more harm in this country than does muslims.
That narrative needed to start the proceedings bec... (show quote)



So, it's not about t***h. It's about a counter narrative. Guess it's not an investigation at all then.

Guess your party better start building those camps since 74 million of us are now d******c t*******ts who oppose what progressives stand for.

Reply
 
 
Jul 28, 2021 21:06:32   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
Voiceodppl wrote:
Who murderedhh Ashli Babbitt? Who told police to let people in? What conversations took place before 1*6? We’re any “ i**********nist” identified as B*M or A****a? If so, who organized them? Let the c*****l p****e board be put on the stand(under oath) and let people who want to know the t***h( not Kinzinger) ask the hard questions


i agree

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 21:18:38   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
woodguru wrote:
You are going to see hearings done in real time, whoever held back police support will be outed, and unlike trump administration investigations, the DOJ will not be there to run interference for trump people this time around, the DOJ formally spelled out that there will be no executive privilege exerted to hide damning testimony behind. The DOJ will be there in support of the House commission, not to obstruct it.

This is a different type of house investigation than we have had to watch the last decade or more that have been about obstruction and B******i style witch hunts, this one can do it's job without interference from both the white house and DOJ
You are going to see hearings done in real time, w... (show quote)


Are you f...img kidding me or is your memory that bad. Do you remember Republicans and Press being kept out of secret Dem hearings where so called "witnesses" were being "interviewed". People who in the end, could not say with any first hand knowledge that Trump did what he was accused of.

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 21:20:41   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
Strycker wrote:
Time will tell how this unfolds. Hopefully it is investigation but the first day says otherwise. I feel for the four witnesses and what they experienced but it seemed that they were chosen to present a certain limited perspective to elicit a predetermined emotional response.

One witness actually said that there were 9000 terrorists, that's right 9000 terrorists, storming the capital that was protected by 175 police officers. The term terrorists was used over and over to push the narrative.

Another police officer said that people in the crowd helped him back to the tunnel where the other police were, but, that point was skimmed over and never repeated by the media because, presumably, it went against the narrative. I guess there were some pretty nice "terrorists" mixed in there.

The democrat opening statement stated that nine people died. That is just an outright lie and misrepresentation of facts.

All the videos shown seemed to be selected to paint a particular extreme narrative. None represent the entire picture of what actually happened.

If this is a different type of investigation in search of t***h as you say then it is a very poor start to that end.
Time will tell how this unfolds. Hopefully it is i... (show quote)


agree

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 21:22:41   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
woodguru wrote:
There's where you are wrong, the difference being hearings will be done in public view, not in secret like republicans like it to where they can gag order dems in the hearings and say they are classified.

Trump staffers will be grilled in public view, if they perjure themselves they will likely be prosecuted. The DOJ has already formally said that there will be no executive privilege to keep them from answering questions.

My guess is that current Biden Intelligence and pentagon people that worked under trump will come under fire for not standing up to trump.
There's where you are wrong, the difference being ... (show quote)


you mean like the Dems closed door hearings against Trump that Republicans had to storm just to get the info out since press weren't even aware of the secret hearings.https://thehill.com/homenews/house/467092-republicans-storm-into-house-hearing-to-break-up-trump-impeachment-testimony

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.