He used the phrase twice:

First time, "We must stop the steal and then we must ensure that such outrageous e******n f***d never happens again, can never be allowed to happen again."

Second time, "Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore and that's what this is all about. And to use a favorite term that all of you people really came up with: We will stop the steal. "

Here's the whole speech and its full context: https://www.npr.org/2021/02/10/966396848/read-trumps-j***6-speech-a-key-part-of-impeachment-trial



Regarding the first use, if the e******n w*s f********t then he was entirely within his rights to say what he did as he did. It is not only Trump who believes the e******n was a complete fraud.

Regarding the second use, he gives the people credit for creating the phrase and expresses his determination to put an end to official dishonesty in Washington DC.

Neither one is a call to revolution and if you bother to read the rest of his words, you will see the full context which states explicitly, "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."

MAKE YOUR VOICES HEARD...

He used the phrase twice:

First time, "We must stop the steal and then we must ensure that such outrageous e******n f***d never happens again, can never be allowed to happen again."

Second time, "Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore and that's what this is all about. And to use a favorite term that all of you people really came up with: We will stop the steal. "

Here's the whole speech and its full context: https://www.npr.org/2021/02/10/966396848/read-trumps-j***6-speech-a-key-part-of-impeachment-trial



Regarding the first use, if the e******n w*s f********t then he was entirely within his rights to say what he did as he did. It is not only Trump who believes the e******n was a complete fraud.

Regarding the second use, he gives the people credit for creating the phrase and expresses his determination to put an end to official dishonesty in Washington DC.

Neither one is a call to revolution and if you bother to read the rest of his words, you will see the full context which states explicitly, "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."

MAKE YOUR VOICES HEARD...

you really are closed minded, aren't you. I haven't got to see the "t***h" because the Dems, Nancy in particular, will not release all the data. I did see on TV, Trump say "go peacefully, I did see guards opening the doors and letting people in, I did see pics of guards taking selfies with the people they let in, I did see Ashely getting shot while climbing through a window. Now that's not to say that there wasn't a group of people who destroyed public property, went into areas they shouldn't have and made verbal threats against some Democrats (these were unarmed threats by the way), all wrong for doing those things. But to say that everybody who showed up for that rally were terrorist pisses me off, those were American citizens that felt like their voices weren't being heard, reminds me of the 60"s.

you really are closed minded, aren't you. I haven't got to see the "t***h" because the Dems, Nancy in particular, will not release all the data. I did see on TV, Trump say "go peacefully, I did see guards opening the doors and letting people in, I did see pics of guards taking selfies with the people they let in, I did see Ashely getting shot while climbing through a window. Now that's not to say that there wasn't a group of people who destroyed public property, went into areas they shouldn't have and made verbal threats against some Democrats (these were unarmed threats by the way), all wrong for doing those things. But to say that everybody who showed up for that rally were terrorist pisses me off, those were American citizens that felt like their voices weren't being heard, reminds me of the 60"s.

Republicans ever changing story on the Jan.6th i**********n.
first It happened and many said it was trump's doing
next it was it happened but it was A****A
next it was it happened but it was peaceful
next was it just didn't happen and no one was to blame
now it's back to it happened but it's Pelosi's fault.
Republicans need to get their story together and at least hold it together for a month or so but they will continue gaslighting their followers into believing any garbage they put out. They're all guilty of allowing this to happen and trying to cover it up only to advance their own political careers.



The New York Times
Nicholas Fandos
Wed, July 28, 2021, 7:21 AM

For months, Republican leaders have downplayed the J*** 6 assault on the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob. But on Tuesday, ahead of the first hearing of a special committee to investigate the r**t, they took their approach to new and misleading extremes, falsely blaming Speaker Nancy Pelosi for the violence.

“The American people deserve to know the t***h that Nancy Pelosi bears responsibility as speaker of the House for the tragedy that occurred on J*** 6,” said Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., the party’s No. 3 leader.

It amounted to an audacious attempt to rewrite the history of the worst attack on the Capitol in two centuries and preempt the damning testimony of four police officers who were brutalized by the mob of Donald Trump’s supporters. Here’s how Republicans twisted the facts.

Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times

Pelosi is not responsible for securing the Capitol.

Looking past the motivations of the mob or Trump, Republicans said it had been up to Pelosi and her leadership team to protect the Capitol from the attack, particularly given that intelligence gathered in the weeks before it occurred pointed to the potential for violence against Congress.

“On J*** 6, these brave officers were put into a vulnerable, impossible position because the leadership at the top has failed,” said Rep. Kevin McCarthy of California, the minority leader.

Pelosi has considerable influence as the speaker, but she is not responsible for the security of Congress. That is the job of the C*****l P****e, an agency Pelosi only indirectly influences. Most decisions about securing the Capitol are made by the C*****l P****e Board, a body that consists of the House and Senate sergeants-at-arms and the Architect of the Capitol.

Pelosi shares control of the Capitol with the Senate majority leader, who at the time was Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. Republicans have made no attempt to blame McConnell for the security breach or for failing to prepare for attack.

That charge also contradicts a bipartisan report produced by a pair of Senate committees that found evidence of systematic failures across American intelligence, military and law enforcement agencies, which misjudged the threat leading up to J*** 6 and were not properly trained to respond to it.

It also flatly contradicted congressional testimony, news reports and public accounts of that day, when Pelosi herself was one of the prime targets of the r****rs, some of whom stalked the halls of the Capitol chanting ominously, “Nancy… Where are you. Nancy?”

Pelosi does not control National Guard requests for the Capitol.

McCarthy and others said that Pelosi had refused pleas by the C*****l P****e to provide backup, like the National Guard, ahead of J*** 6.

But the speaker of the House does not control the National Guard. And while Congress could have requested support in advance, that decision lies with the C*****l P****e Board, not the speaker.

Members of the C*****l P****e board have provided conflicting accounts of a debate that occurred on Jan. 4 over whether to request the help in advance. Steven A. Sund, then the chief of C*****l P****e, has said he asked the board for the preemptive assistance but was rebuffed.

Among the reasons cited, Sund said, was a concern by the House sergeant-at-arms, Paul D. Irving, about the “optics” of bringing in reinforcements. Stefanik falsely attributed that concern to Pelosi, whose aides have said she only learned of the request days later.

A Times investigation detailed why it took nearly two hours to approve the deployment on J** 6. After r****rs breached the Capitol, Sund called Irving at 1:09 p.m. with an urgent request for the National Guard. Irving approached Pelosi’s staff with the request at 1:40 p.m., and her chief of staff relayed it to her at 1:43 p.m., when she approved it. But it would be hours more before Pentagon officials signed off on the deployment and informed the District of Columbia National Guard commander that he had permission to deploy the troops.