I reckon as how I'll decline the "Jab", with just cause: The mortality rate, for my age group, in my state, for the past year, among c***d cases; was 2.0%. In 2007*, the mortality...

Gatsby

The mortality rate, for my age group, in my state, for the past year, among c***d cases; was 2.0%.

In 2007*, the mortality rate, for my age group, in my state, for the year; was 1.89%.

At best, getting the highly controversial "jab" betters my odds by a mere 0.11%.

I reckon that I'll Decline.

*The last year that I found reliable data from. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/mortality/gmwk23r.htm

BTW: My Dad taught me better than to buy "a pig in a poke".

Ricktloml

Gatsby wrote:

The mortality rate, for my age group, in my state,... (show quote)

For a v***s with a recovery rate in 99+%, one has to wonder why the extreme coercive efforts to inject an experimental drug, (that has never been able to pass FDA safety requirements, thus the Emergency Authorization Use necessity in order to be able to even offer it,) ESPECIALLY to children. And of course now the propaganda press and the Democrat/C*******t Party want to blame Republicans for the "v*****e hesitancy", when it was Biden and Harris who, when interviewed, said they didn't trust the v*****e, simply because it was developed during the Trump administration. Meanwhile thousands of i******s with C****-** are not only pouring across our open Southern border, they are being shipped all over the country. As malicious, dishonest, untrustworthy and anti-American as the Democrat/C*******t Party is one has to wonder if they aren't creating the very real possibility in a rise of cases for what they think will be political advantage.

Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas

Gatsby wrote:

The mortality rate, for my age group, in my state,... (show quote)

The liability clause alone is enough for me to say "hell no" to the injection.

If I can't sue the pharmaceutical company after their drug causes me harm, then they can take their jab and shove it up the libtards asses.

Gatsby

Wolf counselor wrote:

The liability clause alone is enough for me to say "hell no" to the injection.

If I can't sue the pharmaceutical company after their drug causes me harm, then they can take their jab and shove it up the libtards asses.

If your employer requires employees to get the jab, can he/she/it be held liable?

Ricktloml

Gatsby wrote:

If your employer requires employees to get the jab, can he/she/it be held liable?

Trial lawyers are going to be happy

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

Gatsby wrote:

The mortality rate, for my age group, in my state,... (show quote)

You better hope c***d looked at the same data you did.

Gatsby

lpnmajor wrote:

You better hope c***d looked at the same data you did.

C***d and the CDC wrote the data that I looked at.

BTW: Feeble

EmilyD

Gatsby wrote:

If your employer requires employees to get the jab, can he/she/it be held liable?

Just like grocery stores with the mask, employees can mandate v*****es. However, in a court of law it wouldn't hold up because it is not approved by the FDA. It could be a "company policy", but an employee could possibly sue for being fired for it....until it is approved. Frankly, I'm surprised that after almost a year, the FDA hasn't been coerced into approving the C***d "v*****es" by the elites! That in itself is cause to stop and think....

EmilyD

Gatsby wrote:

C***d and the CDC wrote the data that I looked at.

BTW: Feeble

The CDC Foundation - the one we all hear about - is not a government agency. They want you to think they are....and they are housed in a section of town with other government buildlings....but they are a 501c3 company...in other words, a charitable organization. That means that other big companies and wealthy people can donate to them.

Let's think about that for a minute. 😳

Ricktloml

EmilyD wrote:

Just like grocery stores with the mask, employees can mandate v*****es. However, in a court of law it wouldn't hold up because it is not approved by the FDA. It could be a "company policy", but an employee could possibly sue for being fired for it....until it is approved. Frankly, I'm surprised that after almost a year, the FDA hasn't been coerced into approving the C***d "v*****es" by the elites! That in itself is cause to stop and think....

Don't be surprised. I saw where there is a push for FDA approval. Too many people figured out the experimental drug didn't have it. It will be hard to believe the approval hasn't been politicized. The coercive nature of those pushing this "v*****e" makes me wonder if any FDA approval will be legitimate.

EmilyD

Ricktloml wrote:

Don't be surprised. I saw where there is a push for FDA approval. Too many people figured out the experimental drug didn't have it. It will be hard to believe the approval hasn't been politicized. The coercive nature of those pushing this "v*****e" makes me wonder if any FDA approval will be legitimate.

I agree...the worrisome part is that more people will put their trust in the FDA, then, because they think somehow it is above being treacherous. I just hope people can use their brains and ask the right questions before getting the shot....like why did they suddenly approve it? Did the lab animals stop dying? Why? What exactly has been approved about the M-RNA technology that has taken so many years (since 1987) to finally, suddenly become safe and effective? Why is it safe and effective....not just that it IS. If those answers (and many more) are not sufficiently and scientifically answered, people should still remain skeptical and suspicious. And if they are doubtful in any way, they should think long and hard about doing this to their bodies.

billy a Loc: South Florida

EmilyD wrote:

I agree...the worrisome part is that more people w... (show quote)

One by one, "govern"ment agencies are losing the public's trust. The troubling part is these agencies aren't doing anything to regain that trust. Even the Office of the President...in your mind, go back to the 60's and 70's. Now put this biden fella in charge of the country... [ cue circus music...]. We need a real leader, and FAST.

Roamin' Catholic Loc: luxurious exile

billy a wrote:

One by one, "govern"ment agencies are losing the public's trust. The troubling part is these agencies aren't doing anything to regain that trust. Even the Office of the President...in your mind, go back to the 60's and 70's. Now put this biden fella in charge of the country... [ cue circus music...]. We need a real leader, and FAST.

🎯

Government, media, big business, "science", so many dance around the t***h. They say it's this and then later they say it's that. Many lie for their own personal gain and do not serve the public interests.

All you can do is gather data from a variety of sources and chart your own course. Don't look to anyone for leadership. But trust in the Lord.

billy a Loc: South Florida

Roamin' Catholic wrote:

🎯

Government, media, big business, "science", so many dance around the t***h. They say it's this and then later they say it's that. Many lie for their own personal gain and do not serve the public interests.

All you can do is gather data from a variety of sources and chart your own course. Don't look to anyone for leadership. But trust in the Lord.

The Father has brought me through some very unusual times. These days aren't much different, except I won't enjoy watching innocent people suffer. Stand strong, R.C.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

Gatsby wrote:

The mortality rate, for my age group, in my state,... (show quote)

No jab. No bed in an ICU if you get sick. Why should a severe car accident victim have to die because you are in the last bed available as a because of your political beliefs