One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Now why would Pelosie block members from the GOP side of the house
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Jul 23, 2021 09:46:29   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
woodguru wrote:
Really Mike, was that a serious question? Jordan was there to turn the investigation into a circus show...

Why would you allow someone on a serious committee that didn't even support the idea of one?

For those that are not paying attention, this investigation may be headed right square for assessing republican roles in the i**********n, several seem to have had contacts with i**********nists and affiliated groups.


What about Democrat roles?

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 09:50:07   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
She does not want anyone to get in the way of her predetermined outcome by asking tough questions and bringing out all the evidence.

All she has to do is release all the video evidence, transcripts of info leading up to the event and witness statements. I'm a pretty smart cookie, like most Americans, I can add but like with her phony Impeachment efforts she wants to stack the deck and try to use magic tricks to present a pre determined outcome.

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 11:00:06   #
fastforwardr1
 
Pelosi wouldn't know what t***h was if it bit her on her ugly old drunk bat a$$.

Reply
 
 
Jul 23, 2021 11:07:45   #
Justice101
 
Gatsby wrote:
Pelosi does not want an investigation, she wants a lynch mob.

What needs to be investigated is the intentional lack of security at the capital.

What needs to be investigated is the involvement of the FBI in the planning and execution of the r**t.

What needs to be investigated is the 20+ "Unidentified, Unindicted Co-Conspirators" that were actively involved.


Bingo! With the FBI involvement and possible entrapment in the 'Whitmer kidnapping case' that fell apart recently, the "Revolver" article that discussed the possibility of FBI involvement of inciting the r**t could have evolved into the actual PLANNING of the r**t through infiltration like in the Whitmer kidnapping case.

The FBI has devolved into a corrupt, rogue agency over MANY generations and needs to be dissected from the TOP on down.

Nasty Nancy is the ring-leader and must be questioned UNDER OATH, as well as Muriel Bowser.

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 12:16:52   #
Liberty Tree
 
Milosia2 wrote:
She didn’t predetermine it.
She only wants the t***h!
The whole t***h and nothing but the t***h.
Jim Jordan can go pedal his nonsense circus downtown.


She has no interest in t***h and never has.

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 12:40:05   #
Big Kahuna
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
She has no interest in t***h and never has.


Pigloosli has been v****d against telling the t***h. She now has another unt***h variant spike protein running rampant in her dna which will be followed by many more unt***h variants until she is so virulent that she has to be euthanized by a Dr Kevorkian clone.

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 12:49:55   #
SGM B Loc: TEXAS but live in Alabama now
 
Milosia2 wrote:
She didn’t predetermine it.
She only wants the t***h!
The whole t***h and nothing but the t***h.
Jim Jordan can go pedal his nonsense circus downtown.


Pigloosly wouldn’t know the t***h if it kicked her ass, and evidently neither would youz.

Reply
 
 
Jul 23, 2021 12:53:20   #
SGM B Loc: TEXAS but live in Alabama now
 
Justice101 wrote:
Bingo! With the FBI involvement and possible entrapment in the 'Whitmer kidnapping case' that fell apart recently, the "Revolver" article that discussed the possibility of FBI involvement of inciting the r**t could have evolved into the actual PLANNING of the r**t through infiltration like in the Whitmer kidnapping case.

The FBI has devolved into a corrupt, rogue agency over MANY generations and needs to be dissected from the TOP on down.

Nasty Nancy is the ring-leader and must be questioned UNDER OATH, as well as Muriel Bowser.
Bingo! With the FBI involvement and possible entra... (show quote)



WooHoo - that works for me!! 👍
Under oath in front of a Military Tribunal.

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 15:06:21   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
proud republican wrote:
Mr Jordan was going to ask a very uncomfortable question....Why C*****l p****e was ready for anything?


Why should the C*****l p****e have been ready for a 'tourist group'? Isn't that the claim...that it was a tourist group that came to the capitol? Or, also, why should they have been ready for a group of patriots? Patriots wouldn't trash the Capitol, would they?

In the effort to keep from focusing on the issue, namely i**********nists invading the Capitol, some folks will tie themselves in logical knots. Sad.

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 15:42:19   #
American Vet
 
working class stiff wrote:
Why should the C*****l p****e have been ready for a 'tourist group'? Isn't that the claim...that it was a tourist group that came to the capitol? Or, also, why should they have been ready for a group of patriots? Patriots wouldn't trash the Capitol, would they?

In the effort to keep from focusing on the issue, namely i**********nists invading the Capitol, some folks will tie themselves in logical knots. Sad.


First: There were no 'i**********nists.

The C*****l p****e were warned ahead of time that there was a high likelihood of problems. President Trump offered the National Guard but pelosi spurned the offer.

What say you?

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 15:53:43   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
American Vet wrote:
First: There were no 'i**********nists.

The C*****l p****e were warned ahead of time that there was a high likelihood of problems. President Trump offered the National Guard but pelosi spurned the offer.

What say you?


I say that is mistaken.

https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/verify/nancy-pelosi-role-in-deploying-the-national-guard-capitol-january-6-kevin-mccarthy/65-056da916-4233-4c69-8e4d-4152800d1554

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/mar/02/donald-trump/no-proof-trump-requested-10000-guard-troops-j***6-/

https://factcheck.afp.com/pelosi-did-not-reject-appeals-troops-secure-us-capitol


From what I read....Speaker Pelosi had no role in either summoning or refusing the help of the national guard as that is part of the executive branch. Apparently help was called for by someone on the C*****l P****e but the Speaker was not responsible for any delay in aid. Most fact check sites claim the assertion that the Speaker refused the National Guard is false.

Reply
 
 
Jul 23, 2021 15:56:27   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
American Vet wrote:
First: There were no 'i**********nists.

The C*****l p****e were warned ahead of time that there was a high likelihood of problems. President Trump offered the National Guard but pelosi spurned the offer.

What say you?


Also, the claim that the Speaker denied the help, and that the police were warned ahead of time about trouble totally contradicts the claim that the mob were 'tourists' or 'patriots'. Sounds like trying to have it both ways.

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 16:00:59   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
You are so full of lies. The C*****l p****e must get permission from the Speaker to beef up security. It was a rally. Rallies got out of control all summer. You liars called em peaceful protests then. The Sergeant at arms says he requested more security, early and often. Pelosi denied all requests. He has now resigned after being asked to do so by Pelosi. British probably said the same thing about Patriots in the Revolutionary War. Another lie you progressive pukes like to regurgitate is the r**t was an i**********n. How many were charged with i**********n or treason? You tie yourself in knots defending the Democrats, no matter what the t***h is. R****rs should be given a hearing, and if guilty sentenced. That’s how it used to work. I have no problem with that. You, on the other hand want to throw the accused’s rights out the window. You make me sick.

working class stiff wrote:
Why should the C*****l p****e have been ready for a 'tourist group'? Isn't that the claim...that it was a tourist group that came to the capitol? Or, also, why should they have been ready for a group of patriots? Patriots wouldn't trash the Capitol, would they?

In the effort to keep from focusing on the issue, namely i**********nists invading the Capitol, some folks will tie themselves in logical knots. Sad.

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 16:03:59   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
working class stiff wrote:
Also, the claim that the Speaker denied the help, and that the police were warned ahead of time about trouble totally contradicts the claim that the mob were 'tourists' or 'patriots'. Sounds like trying to have it both ways.


The FBI were warned ahead of time and passed it on that there might be trouble makers in the crowd. I doubt if everyone who participated in B*M protests all summer started fires and broke windows. Are those peaceful protests?

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 16:05:24   #
woodguru
 
proud republican wrote:
Mr Jordan was going to ask a very uncomfortable question....Why C*****l p****e was ready for anything?


Apparently you missed Jordan style circus acts during impeachment hearings. In a serious investigation the only questions that have re;evance have to do with the hearing topics at hand, not the right wing whataboutism...Jordan was going to deflect to a****a r**ts and block and obstruct real directions the investigation leads.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.