One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trump touts "disinformation"
Page <<first <prev 18 of 22 next> last>>
Jul 24, 2021 10:16:53   #
Cuda2020
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
Not "allegations"! Solid evidence!! I think an investigative audit of California should be forthcoming.


We've been there done that, it's done, you just can't accept it. It is not that fact that possibly some corrupted v****g went on, but there was no solid evidence that there was enough corrupted v****g that it would have made any impact. A couple of cases doesn't mean squat. They probably did it just to try and prove "look it had happen", sorry that's not enough. The attempts of the spoilers were in vein.

Reply
Jul 24, 2021 10:56:35   #
Radiance3
 
slatten49 wrote:
Tell-All Authors Confronted Donald Trump On His Lies And He Replied With 1 Word

Lee Moran; Tue, July 20, 2021

Former President Donald Trump had a surprisingly candid response when challenged over the tens of thousands of lies he told during his time in office, according to the author of a new tell-all book.

“We asked him why, as president, he thought it was OK for him to continually tell the American people things that were not true, to lie again and again and again,” Washington Post journalist Philip Rucker recalled of interviewing Trump on Tuesday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

“And he said to us, ‘You know, there’s a beautiful word, and it’s called disinformation*,’” Rucker said.

Rucker and fellow Post journalist Carol Leonnig sat down with Trump at his private Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, in March for their book documenting the last months of his presidency. The tell-all, titled “‘I Alone Can Fix It’: Donald J. Trump’s Catastrophic Final Year,” was released Tuesday.

When asked why Trump bothered to do the interview, given his attacks on the media in general and the Post in particular, Leonnig suggested that the former president knew he was addicted to the attention.

”It is a sickness in some respects,” she said. “However, I would argue part of the reason he sat with us for so long is because we were eager to hear his explanations ... his narrative of this incredible, consequential and ultimately catastrophic year. We wanted him to have a chance to explain that.”

Trump’s main grievances centered on “how often people around him failed him,” she added. “I think it’s so interesting his narrative is basically that he alone was the brilliant genius and everyone else was an enemy or a weak, paltry stand-in.”

*disinformation; NOUN - false information which is intended to mislead, especially propaganda issued by a government organization to a rival power or the media. Synonyms: lie · falsehood · fib · fabrication · deception · made-up story · trumped-up story · f**e news · invention · fiction · piece of fiction · falsification · falsity · cock and bull story · barefaced lie · (little) white lie · half-t***h · exaggeration · prevarication
Tell-All Authors Confronted Donald Trump On His Li... (show quote)

==================
Disinformation are all about Pelosi's schemes to project and frame-up president Trump of their sk**led schemes thru fabrications and lies which have been their SOP since 2016 against former president Trump. I believe that Pelosi framed all these events that happened at Capital Hill on J** 6th. Reasons why she denied to have added security forces even warned that mayhem were anticipated by A****AS, B*M's and P***d B**s all allied to the FBI's. That is why those A****AS, and B*MS are all freed, while the innocent political opponents exercising their constitutional rights peacefully are all jailed.

Actually that makes Pelosi as the "i**********nist" !

Reply
Jul 24, 2021 11:00:01   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
PeterS wrote:
On the contrary, the sanctity of the v**e is relevant. That's what this was all about. That's why the v**es were counted, and in many cases counted multiple times...to preserve the sanctity of our v**es. This is about a segment of our population more willing to listen to lies than they are the t***h not the sanctity of our v**es.


But until there is an impartial federal court trial reviewing and disclosing of wh**ever the documents show there is no bi partisan “ independent” verification of the process.. How do any of us know what is contained in all those lawsuits that were arbitrarily dismissed without disclosure of the contents...??? I want to know and I would assume so would you..

The SCOTUS certainly did have jurisdiction given the multi state diversity of so much yet hid behind lack of jurisdiction in that Texas suit?? Lack of jurisdiction when it addressed how many other states??? Really???

We have a right to know what those suits specifically relied on in their allegations.. Why has none of it been produced even after the fact??? All public record at this point right??

Reply
 
 
Jul 24, 2021 11:09:41   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Show this solid evidence. Nobody has seen it.


Exactly the point....T***sparency???

Reply
Jul 24, 2021 11:11:22   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
PeterS wrote:
And you think he will believe that? He's a conservative--they believe what they want to believe and nothing a LIBERAL says (and here a liberal is anyone who doesn't think EXACTLY as they do) will ever convince them otherwise. Slate, don't play into them. Conservatives live on disinformation. Remember, these are people who think that anything objective is F**E NEWS. So if you listen to f**e news anything you say must be equally f**e, correct!


Boy is that a fair statement that could be said by both parties against both parties.

Along with the enabling of these f**e news sites whether they be Republican or Democrat.

Reply
Jul 24, 2021 11:13:54   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
PeterS wrote:
But they would only be trusted by the majority of conservatives so unless you can have a system that can be trusted by the majority of the country then you don't have a system that can be trusted at all!


Supposedly we do have a system in that our federal jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States... Unfortunately that wasn’t the case so the country as left in the same situation it started out with. Remind you of a JFK investigation with so many questions unanswered doesn’t it??

Reply
Jul 24, 2021 11:23:15   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
lindajoy wrote:
Nothing more than the constant recitation of it thinking people will believe it eventually...

Its called conditioning~~~


Disinformation. Same thing.

Reply
 
 
Jul 24, 2021 11:23:56   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Cuda2020 wrote:
As I said before, the term "To defund the police" should be completely abandon as there are to many definitions to its meaning and only will lead to miscommunications. IE to defund doesn't necessarily relate to eliminating but rather reappropriate, yet it can...the word now leads to confusion, where people are not on the same page. This has been happening a lot with the English language.

To adjust to this rising problem, the police force should have a special team for an on call bases.
As I said before, the term "To defund the pol... (show quote)


It’s a shame what you say here is not what the action of the different municipalities show... We’ve seen eliminate, just not the reappropriating of, when does that come since they now have such savings in less police with more budgets approved for “ alternative measures.” How high do the crime statistics have to go or how many raped, k**led, robbed for our illustrious politicians to “ act ??

I wish what you say here was the intent it just isn't working out that easy or that way.....

Sweeping “defund the police” as put out by AOC must’ve been the start of the confusion since so many v**ed against congress at that time and Congress even called her out as to why they lost seats...

Reply
Jul 24, 2021 11:24:36   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Disinformation. Same thing.


Yes......

Reply
Jul 24, 2021 11:37:00   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Cuda2020 wrote:
As I said before, the term "To defund the police" should be completely abandon as there are to many definitions to its meaning and only will lead to miscommunications. IE to defund doesn't necessarily relate to eliminating but rather reappropriate, yet it can...the word now leads to confusion, where people are not on the same page. This has been happening a lot with the English language.

To adjust to this rising problem, the police force should have a special team for an on call bases.
As I said before, the term "To defund the pol... (show quote)


Bottom line is that it results in less police presence and money out of their pocket; not a great way to maintain morale.

Reply
Jul 24, 2021 12:13:34   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Bottom line is that it results in less police presence and money out of their pocket; not a great way to maintain morale.


Or safety for they and the general public...

Reply
 
 
Jul 24, 2021 12:35:31   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
lindajoy wrote:
Or safety for they and the general public...


Zakary!

Reply
Jul 24, 2021 13:24:53   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Zakary!



Reply
Jul 24, 2021 14:20:23   #
Cuda2020
 
lindajoy wrote:
It’s a shame what you say here is not what the action of the different municipalities show... We’ve seen eliminate, just not the reappropriating of, when does that come since they now have such savings in less police with more budgets approved for “ alternative measures.” How high do the crime statistics have to go or how many raped, k**led, robbed for our illustrious politicians to “ act ??

I wish what you say here was the intent it just isn't working out that easy or that way.....

Sweeping “defund the police” as put out by AOC must’ve been the start of the confusion since so many v**ed against congress at that time and Congress even called her out as to why they lost seats...
It’s a shame what you say here is not what the act... (show quote)


Are you sure the shortages of police are not from cutting people but from officers resigning? I've read that has been happening ever since the Floyd case.

Reply
Jul 24, 2021 14:26:48   #
Cuda2020
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Bottom line is that it results in less police presence and money out of their pocket; not a great way to maintain morale.


All this change people might see as a bad thing, I don't, I see it as an opportunity to make some positive changes, our society is changing, I believe for the better, we are becoming more compassionate to human life, to not shoot to k**l then ask questions later, that hasn't worked out so great. But OK let's start with moral issues, let's start with not shooting to k**l, let's value life more. Let's revamp for the better. Can we do that?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 18 of 22 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.