Healthcare overrides free speech? Our Biden admin is working in collusion to stifle speech which they do not agree with, calling it misinformation and that it is k*****g people. Sorry...

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Our Biden admin is working in collusion to stifle speech which they do not agree with, calling it misinformation and that it is k*****g people.

Sorry Joe, you guys also hid other information which you disagreed with, that being that hydroxychloroquin was dangerous, would k**l us and did not help against Civid. We know that was wrong and we know it cost lives, k**led people. IOW, you censored information that could have saved lives because you disagreed with it, and now we know you were wrong, you sorry c****e PO crap c***ter!

Do not proclaim to know. Do not shut down free speech.

woodguru

nwtk2007 wrote:

Our Biden admin is working in collusion to stifle... (show quote)

The right is too ignorant to realize that the government does this with t***h in advertising laws so that manufacturers can't make any stupidly false claims about things they can't prove are true.

Why is it that the media can intentionally lie to people about things that are k*****g them? I support the concept of media being forced to be able to prove anything they represent as facts...not prove moronic things that have no reality aren't true.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

LOL! If you used the same rules you’d never be able to talk. You’re the biggest liar on OPP.

woodguru wrote:

The right is too ignorant to realize that the government does this with t***h in advertising laws so that manufacturers can't make any stupidly false claims about things they can't prove are true.

Why is it that the media can intentionally lie to people about things that are k*****g them? I support the concept of media being forced to be able to prove anything they represent as facts...not prove moronic things that have no reality aren't true.

American Vet

woodguru wrote:

The right is too ignorant to realize that the government does this with t***h in advertising laws so that manufacturers can't make any stupidly false claims about things they can't prove are true.

Why is it that the media can intentionally lie to people about things that are k*****g them? I support the concept of media being forced to be able to prove anything they represent as facts...not prove moronic things that have no reality aren't true.

Either by omission or by commission, the US media actively misinforms the public on crucial issues that matter. The reason they do this is because they legally can.
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/337424-us-media-lie-mckinney/

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

nwtk2007 wrote:

Our Biden admin is working in collusion to stifle... (show quote)

Free speech does not mean there won't be consequences for what is spoken. Go into an airport and proclaim "bombs are cool" and see what happens.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

woodguru wrote:

The right is too ignorant to realize that the government does this with t***h in advertising laws so that manufacturers can't make any stupidly false claims about things they can't prove are true.

Why is it that the media can intentionally lie to people about things that are k*****g them? I support the concept of media being forced to be able to prove anything they represent as facts...not prove moronic things that have no reality aren't true.

I gave a greaat example of how the gov pushing their l*****t opinion (pure politics on hydroxychloroquine) k**led people. T***h in advertising is telling people you offer something and then don't only to lure them in. Opinions and even scientific facts about v*****es and c***d do not fall into the category of false advertising.

Just as political positions and platforms do not. DO NOT equate opinions and concerns about c***d v******tions with false advertising.

And why can the media intentionally lie about anything???

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

American Vet wrote:

Either by omission or by commission, the US media actively misinforms the public on crucial issues that matter. The reason they do this is because they legally can.
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/337424-us-media-lie-mckinney/

And that is how the Russians view us, RT being the source. And now they are in collusion with big tech and the Biden administration to pedal this l*****t agenda, proclaiming C***d to be the reason they can violate the constitution and our rights under it. This administration IS NOT AMERICAN.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

lpnmajor wrote:

Free speech does not mean there won't be consequences for what is spoken. Go into an airport and proclaim "bombs are cool" and see what happens.

Yes, we know that.

EmilyD

nwtk2007 wrote:

Our Biden admin is working in collusion to stifle... (show quote)

More and more Americans, including Democrats, are seeing this. As the t***h starts to emerge about reactions to the gene manipulation inoculation, people are realizing what exactly is going on. The more the government, media, Big Pharma and g*******ts try to cover the t***h up, the more we are becoming suspicions. Questions are starting to occur to people, such as, "Why are they trying to censure reports from scientists, researchers and medical doctors about the injection? What are they trying to cover up? Why did the HCQ pack and Ivermectin suddenly disappear? Why are people who discuss the M-RNA injection being banned and censured? Who is benefiting from the censorship?" And there are many more questions than those that people want answered!

EmilyD

lpnmajor wrote:

Free speech does not mean there won't be consequences for what is spoken. Go into an airport and proclaim "bombs are cool" and see what happens.

Dangerous speech is not the same as free speech. Shouting "bomb" at an airport or "fire" in a movie theater would cause panic, which would create a dangerous situation. Dangerous speech is not protected by the First Amendment, and the perpetrator would be charged with a crime under 18 U.S.C.A. (US Code).

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

EmilyD wrote:

More and more Americans, including Democrats, are ... (show quote)

I don't think it's sinister but all about money. Gates is heavy into the v*****es and it is him that is pushing them. But who knows.

As for HCQ, they have to hide how they literally k**led thousands by diverting them and their doctors from it and Iver.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

EmilyD wrote:

Dangerous speech is not the same as free speech. Shouting "bomb" at an airport or "fire" in a movie theater would cause panic, which would create a dangerous situation. Dangerous speech is not protected by the First Amendment, and the perpetrator would be charged with a crime under 18 U.S.C.A. (US Code).

Exactly.

EmilyD

nwtk2007 wrote:

I don't think it's sinister but all about money. Gates is heavy into the v*****es and it is him that is pushing them. But who knows.

As for HCQ, they have to hide how they literally k**led thousands by diverting them and their doctors from it and Iver.

The sinister part is that people have died who shouldn't have, and Gates, et al., don't care about it....the money is more important than lives to them. And withholding a drug that has been proven unequivocally to help in the treatment of C***d should be a crime. It won't be, though. It's getting really crazy!

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

EmilyD wrote:

The sinister part is that people have died who shouldn't have, and Gates, et al., don't care about it....the money is more important than lives to them. And withholding a drug that has been proven unequivocally to help in the treatment of C***d should be a crime. It won't be, though. It's getting really crazy!

Reducing the population is Gates dream. Always has been. As long as he’s not one of the ones getting reduced.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

EmilyD wrote:

The sinister part is that people have died who shouldn't have, and Gates, et al., don't care about it....the money is more important than lives to them. And withholding a drug that has been proven unequivocally to help in the treatment of C***d should be a crime. It won't be, though. It's getting really crazy!

I agree, it is!