One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Tragic Fall of Donald Trump
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jul 13, 2021 07:42:39   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
The National Review, By Mario Loyola...from January 21, 2021

Like in a tale from Shakespeare, he brought it on himself.

Webster’s Third New International Dictionary defines hubris as “overweening p***e or self-confidence: arrogance.” It is a quality the celebrity billionaire Donald Trump had long possessed, to an often-entertaining degree. But the comedy was merely prologue for an epic rise to power that nobody could have foreseen — nobody except himself, of course. What was perhaps more foreseeable, at least in retrospect, was the tragic fall.

In literature, a “tragic hero” has to be larger-than-life, but he needn’t be particularly sympathetic. Shakespeare’s tragic heroes run the gamut from those we couldn’t care less about, such as Antony and Cleopatra, to the frustrating Hamlet, to those, like Othello and above all King Lear, whose stories are almost unbearably sad. What they all have in common is some terrible flaw that dooms them to make a terrible mistake.

Trump is certainly larger than life, but is he a sympathetic character? On one end, tens of millions of Americans won’t feel satisfied until Trump is rotting in prison. On the other, tens of millions see him as every bit the hero, protecting them and America itself from the forces of evil and corruption, an underdog who wins against the odds, while suffering the vilest abuses and betrayals. Still others see varying degrees of good in him, but can’t help being dismayed or revolted by his gratuitous insults, self-inflicted injuries, and myriad of other foibles.

However much you love him — or don’t — there is no denying his major character flaw: a crippling degree of vanity. Consider this exchange with Chris Wallace, from a July 2020 Fox News Sunday interview. At the end, Wallace asks, “Whether it’s in 2021 or 2025, how will you regard your years as president of the United States?”

It was the softest of softballs, which any normal politician would have answered by expressing gratitude at the opportunity to serve the country, and what a wonderful country, etc. Here is how Trump answered the question:

TRUMP: I think I was very unfairly treated. From before I even won I was under investigation by a bunch of thieves, crooks. It was an illegal investigation.

WALLACE: But what about the good —

TRUMP: Russia, Russia, Russia.

WALLACE: But what about the good parts, sir?

TRUMP: No, no. I want to go [into] this. I have done more than any president in history in the first three and a half years, and I’ve done it suffering through investigations where people have been — General Flynn, where people have been so unfairly treated.

The Russia h**x, it was all a h**x. The Mueller s**m, it was all s**m. It was all false. I made a bad decision on — one bad decision. Jeff Sessions, and now I feel good because he lost overwhelmingly in the great state of Alabama.

Here’s the bottom line. I’ve been very unfairly treated, and I don’t say that as paranoid. I’ve been very — everybody says it . . .

This is literary material, almost as good as the passages that Shakespeare lifted whole from Holinshed’s Chronicles of England or Plutarch’s Parallel Lives. It shows how vanity diminishes the character proportionately. If only Trump had been a bit more humbled by the honor of the presidency, how much greater he might have been!

His tragic flaw thus illustrated, here was his terrible mistake: After the e******n, instead of focusing on his supporters’ legitimate concerns about the e*******l process, he made it all about himself. Convinced, rightly or wrongly, that the e******n had been stolen, Trump fixated ferociously on the idea that it had been stolen from him.

During the 2020 e******n cycle, and indeed during most of Trump’s presidency, Big Tech and the media openly manipulated the flow of information to benefit Democrats, suppressing legitimate news that would hurt Democrats and amplifying misinformation (such as the Russia-Trump collusion h**x) that would hurt Republicans. And after years of Democrats’ pushing relentlessly to loosen e******n-integrity laws, such as v**er-ID requirements, many states enacted mail-in v****g and other loose rules for conducting the e******n in the midst of a p******c, all in ways that seemed calculated to benefit Democrats, however sincere the “social justice” reasons.

It was both foreseeable and understandable that tens of millions of people would emerge from the e******n thinking that it had been stolen, and Democrats would be more convincing if they acted a bit less surprised, given their own role in staging the drama. BUT HERE IS THE POINT: EVEN IF THE E******N WERE STOLEN, IT WAS NOT STOLEN FROM TRUMP; IT WAS STOLEN FROM THE V**ERS. If the e******n was dubious, the remedy was not to reverse it by even-more-dubious means, which could only divide the nation even more bitterly, but rather to highlight the problems and to push for solutions that Americans could agree on.

Hence, the day after the e******n, Trump had before him two very different courses of action. He could accept the formal result of the e******n, highlight the sanctity of democratic procedure, and use his continuing leadership of the Republican Party to push for reform — and perhaps for another run in 2024. Or he could fan the flames of popular fury, further undermine the people’s trust in our democratic institutions, and risk all in a desperate gambit to benefit himself.

Tragically for all of us, he chose the latter course. He took little interest in the crucial runoff e******ns looming in the state of Georgia, on which depended the GOP’s continued control of the Senate. This was tragedy at its finest, because only a GOP Senate could now protect many of Trump’s greatest achievements, such as the tax reform of 2017. And GOP control of the Senate would be vital in addressing all that went wrong in the 2020 e******n.

But Trump and his more fanatical supporters demanded fealty to his increasingly theatrical attempts to reverse the results of the e******n, instigating a civil war within the Republican Party. Leading Trump supporters promised that Republicans who didn’t join the farce would be “finished forever.” Thus, in a childish temper tantrum over losing the White House, Trump dead-enders threw away control of the Senate, a stupid and unforgivable betrayal of the Republican Party. It was the fanatical Trumpers’ most shameful moment, and recalls Octavius Caesar’s final indictment of Antony: “’Tis to be chid— / As we rate boys who, being mature in knowledge, / Pawn their experience to their present pleasure, / And so rebel to judgment.”

But worse was to come. Rather than focus his energies on the January 5 runoff e******n in Georgia, Trump instead staged a massive rally for himself the following day in Washington, D.C., in a final desperate bid to get then-Vice President Pence to cancel the certification of e*****rs and reverse the e******n result. The horrifying images of Trump’s rabble storming the Capitol, leaving five people dead, will forever shame his legacy.

Certainly he did not intend it. But if it was not a foreseeable result of all he did and said up until then, it was weirdly inevitable, like the bloodbath at the end of Hamlet.

The tragedy of Trump is that his hubris led him to betray the very tens of millions of v**ers whose trust and loyalty he had rightly won. Alas, there is an inescapable conflict between vanity and greatness, a t***h we have forgotten along with the Tragedy of Coriolanus.

As Aristotle wrote in the Poetics, the tragic protagonist’s “misfortune is brought about not by vice or depravity, but by some error or frailty.” It is not always easy to feel sorry for someone who brings about his own downfall. But therein lies the power of tragedy.

Reply
Jul 13, 2021 09:04:37   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
slatten49 wrote:
The National Review, By Mario Loyola...from January 21, 2021

Like in a tale from Shakespeare, he brought it on himself.

Webster’s Third New International Dictionary defines hubris as “overweening p***e or self-confidence: arrogance.” It is a quality the celebrity billionaire Donald Trump had long possessed, to an often-entertaining degree. But the comedy was merely prologue for an epic rise to power that nobody could have foreseen — nobody except himself, of course. What was perhaps more foreseeable, at least in retrospect, was the tragic fall.

In literature, a “tragic hero” has to be larger-than-life, but he needn’t be particularly sympathetic. Shakespeare’s tragic heroes run the gamut from those we couldn’t care less about, such as Antony and Cleopatra, to the frustrating Hamlet, to those, like Othello and above all King Lear, whose stories are almost unbearably sad. What they all have in common is some terrible flaw that dooms them to make a terrible mistake.

Trump is certainly larger than life, but is he a sympathetic character? On one end, tens of millions of Americans won’t feel satisfied until Trump is rotting in prison. On the other, tens of millions see him as every bit the hero, protecting them and America itself from the forces of evil and corruption, an underdog who wins against the odds, while suffering the vilest abuses and betrayals. Still others see varying degrees of good in him, but can’t help being dismayed or revolted by his gratuitous insults, self-inflicted injuries, and myriad of other foibles.

However much you love him — or don’t — there is no denying his major character flaw: a crippling degree of vanity. Consider this exchange with Chris Wallace, from a July 2020 Fox News Sunday interview. At the end, Wallace asks, “Whether it’s in 2021 or 2025, how will you regard your years as president of the United States?”

It was the softest of softballs, which any normal politician would have answered by expressing gratitude at the opportunity to serve the country, and what a wonderful country, etc. Here is how Trump answered the question:

TRUMP: I think I was very unfairly treated. From before I even won I was under investigation by a bunch of thieves, crooks. It was an illegal investigation.

WALLACE: But what about the good —

TRUMP: Russia, Russia, Russia.

WALLACE: But what about the good parts, sir?

TRUMP: No, no. I want to go [into] this. I have done more than any president in history in the first three and a half years, and I’ve done it suffering through investigations where people have been — General Flynn, where people have been so unfairly treated.

The Russia h**x, it was all a h**x. The Mueller s**m, it was all s**m. It was all false. I made a bad decision on — one bad decision. Jeff Sessions, and now I feel good because he lost overwhelmingly in the great state of Alabama.

Here’s the bottom line. I’ve been very unfairly treated, and I don’t say that as paranoid. I’ve been very — everybody says it . . .

This is literary material, almost as good as the passages that Shakespeare lifted whole from Holinshed’s Chronicles of England or Plutarch’s Parallel Lives. It shows how vanity diminishes the character proportionately. If only Trump had been a bit more humbled by the honor of the presidency, how much greater he might have been!

His tragic flaw thus illustrated, here was his terrible mistake: After the e******n, instead of focusing on his supporters’ legitimate concerns about the e*******l process, he made it all about himself. Convinced, rightly or wrongly, that the e******n had been stolen, Trump fixated ferociously on the idea that it had been stolen from him.

During the 2020 e******n cycle, and indeed during most of Trump’s presidency, Big Tech and the media openly manipulated the flow of information to benefit Democrats, suppressing legitimate news that would hurt Democrats and amplifying misinformation (such as the Russia-Trump collusion h**x) that would hurt Republicans. And after years of Democrats’ pushing relentlessly to loosen e******n-integrity laws, such as v**er-ID requirements, many states enacted mail-in v****g and other loose rules for conducting the e******n in the midst of a p******c, all in ways that seemed calculated to benefit Democrats, however sincere the “social justice” reasons.

It was both foreseeable and understandable that tens of millions of people would emerge from the e******n thinking that it had been stolen, and Democrats would be more convincing if they acted a bit less surprised, given their own role in staging the drama. BUT HERE IS THE POINT: EVEN IF THE E******N WERE STOLEN, IT WAS NOT STOLEN FROM TRUMP; IT WAS STOLEN FROM THE V**ERS. If the e******n was dubious, the remedy was not to reverse it by even-more-dubious means, which could only divide the nation even more bitterly, but rather to highlight the problems and to push for solutions that Americans could agree on.

Hence, the day after the e******n, Trump had before him two very different courses of action. He could accept the formal result of the e******n, highlight the sanctity of democratic procedure, and use his continuing leadership of the Republican Party to push for reform — and perhaps for another run in 2024. Or he could fan the flames of popular fury, further undermine the people’s trust in our democratic institutions, and risk all in a desperate gambit to benefit himself.

Tragically for all of us, he chose the latter course. He took little interest in the crucial runoff e******ns looming in the state of Georgia, on which depended the GOP’s continued control of the Senate. This was tragedy at its finest, because only a GOP Senate could now protect many of Trump’s greatest achievements, such as the tax reform of 2017. And GOP control of the Senate would be vital in addressing all that went wrong in the 2020 e******n.

But Trump and his more fanatical supporters demanded fealty to his increasingly theatrical attempts to reverse the results of the e******n, instigating a civil war within the Republican Party. Leading Trump supporters promised that Republicans who didn’t join the farce would be “finished forever.” Thus, in a childish temper tantrum over losing the White House, Trump dead-enders threw away control of the Senate, a stupid and unforgivable betrayal of the Republican Party. It was the fanatical Trumpers’ most shameful moment, and recalls Octavius Caesar’s final indictment of Antony: “’Tis to be chid— / As we rate boys who, being mature in knowledge, / Pawn their experience to their present pleasure, / And so rebel to judgment.”

But worse was to come. Rather than focus his energies on the January 5 runoff e******n in Georgia, Trump instead staged a massive rally for himself the following day in Washington, D.C., in a final desperate bid to get then-Vice President Pence to cancel the certification of e*****rs and reverse the e******n result. The horrifying images of Trump’s rabble storming the Capitol, leaving five people dead, will forever shame his legacy.

Certainly he did not intend it. But if it was not a foreseeable result of all he did and said up until then, it was weirdly inevitable, like the bloodbath at the end of Hamlet.

The tragedy of Trump is that his hubris led him to betray the very tens of millions of v**ers whose trust and loyalty he had rightly won. Alas, there is an inescapable conflict between vanity and greatness, a t***h we have forgotten along with the Tragedy of Coriolanus.

As Aristotle wrote in the Poetics, the tragic protagonist’s “misfortune is brought about not by vice or depravity, but by some error or frailty.” It is not always easy to feel sorry for someone who brings about his own downfall. But therein lies the power of tragedy.
The National Review, By Mario Loyola...from Januar... (show quote)



Reply
Jul 13, 2021 09:41:57   #
vernon
 
lpnmajor wrote:



Reply
 
 
Jul 13, 2021 09:44:27   #
Rose42
 
in essence this article isn’t much different than many others about Trump

Reply
Jul 13, 2021 09:57:33   #
Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial
 
Rose42 wrote:
in essence this article isn’t much different than many others about Trump


Because in essence, that's all trump cares about, himself at the expense of everything & everyone else. Most articles are like this because this is trump.

Reply
Jul 13, 2021 10:31:23   #
vernon
 
Tiptop789 wrote:
Because in essence, that's all trump cares about, himself at the expense of everything & everyone else. Most articles are like this because this is trump.


You don't know Trump ,just the lies that the RATS have been putting out since 2016. Most of it has been proven a lie but some die hards hang on just out of pure h**e,which was created by scags like pelosi and schumer.

Reply
Jul 13, 2021 10:33:06   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
Rose42 wrote:
in essence this article isn’t much different than many others about Trump

No disagreement with you on this. Trump remains being his own worst enemy.

Reply
 
 
Jul 13, 2021 10:39:21   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
slatten49 wrote:
The National Review, By Mario Loyola...from January 21, 2021

Like in a tale from Shakespeare, he brought it on himself.

Webster’s Third New International Dictionary defines hubris as “overweening p***e or self-confidence: arrogance.” It is a quality the celebrity billionaire Donald Trump had long possessed, to an often-entertaining degree. But the comedy was merely prologue for an epic rise to power that nobody could have foreseen — nobody except himself, of course. What was perhaps more foreseeable, at least in retrospect, was the tragic fall.

In literature, a “tragic hero” has to be larger-than-life, but he needn’t be particularly sympathetic. Shakespeare’s tragic heroes run the gamut from those we couldn’t care less about, such as Antony and Cleopatra, to the frustrating Hamlet, to those, like Othello and above all King Lear, whose stories are almost unbearably sad. What they all have in common is some terrible flaw that dooms them to make a terrible mistake.

Trump is certainly larger than life, but is he a sympathetic character? On one end, tens of millions of Americans won’t feel satisfied until Trump is rotting in prison. On the other, tens of millions see him as every bit the hero, protecting them and America itself from the forces of evil and corruption, an underdog who wins against the odds, while suffering the vilest abuses and betrayals. Still others see varying degrees of good in him, but can’t help being dismayed or revolted by his gratuitous insults, self-inflicted injuries, and myriad of other foibles.

However much you love him — or don’t — there is no denying his major character flaw: a crippling degree of vanity. Consider this exchange with Chris Wallace, from a July 2020 Fox News Sunday interview. At the end, Wallace asks, “Whether it’s in 2021 or 2025, how will you regard your years as president of the United States?”

It was the softest of softballs, which any normal politician would have answered by expressing gratitude at the opportunity to serve the country, and what a wonderful country, etc. Here is how Trump answered the question:

TRUMP: I think I was very unfairly treated. From before I even won I was under investigation by a bunch of thieves, crooks. It was an illegal investigation.

WALLACE: But what about the good —

TRUMP: Russia, Russia, Russia.

WALLACE: But what about the good parts, sir?

TRUMP: No, no. I want to go [into] this. I have done more than any president in history in the first three and a half years, and I’ve done it suffering through investigations where people have been — General Flynn, where people have been so unfairly treated.

The Russia h**x, it was all a h**x. The Mueller s**m, it was all s**m. It was all false. I made a bad decision on — one bad decision. Jeff Sessions, and now I feel good because he lost overwhelmingly in the great state of Alabama.

Here’s the bottom line. I’ve been very unfairly treated, and I don’t say that as paranoid. I’ve been very — everybody says it . . .

This is literary material, almost as good as the passages that Shakespeare lifted whole from Holinshed’s Chronicles of England or Plutarch’s Parallel Lives. It shows how vanity diminishes the character proportionately. If only Trump had been a bit more humbled by the honor of the presidency, how much greater he might have been!

His tragic flaw thus illustrated, here was his terrible mistake: After the e******n, instead of focusing on his supporters’ legitimate concerns about the e*******l process, he made it all about himself. Convinced, rightly or wrongly, that the e******n had been stolen, Trump fixated ferociously on the idea that it had been stolen from him.

During the 2020 e******n cycle, and indeed during most of Trump’s presidency, Big Tech and the media openly manipulated the flow of information to benefit Democrats, suppressing legitimate news that would hurt Democrats and amplifying misinformation (such as the Russia-Trump collusion h**x) that would hurt Republicans. And after years of Democrats’ pushing relentlessly to loosen e******n-integrity laws, such as v**er-ID requirements, many states enacted mail-in v****g and other loose rules for conducting the e******n in the midst of a p******c, all in ways that seemed calculated to benefit Democrats, however sincere the “social justice” reasons.

It was both foreseeable and understandable that tens of millions of people would emerge from the e******n thinking that it had been stolen, and Democrats would be more convincing if they acted a bit less surprised, given their own role in staging the drama. BUT HERE IS THE POINT: EVEN IF THE E******N WERE STOLEN, IT WAS NOT STOLEN FROM TRUMP; IT WAS STOLEN FROM THE V**ERS. If the e******n was dubious, the remedy was not to reverse it by even-more-dubious means, which could only divide the nation even more bitterly, but rather to highlight the problems and to push for solutions that Americans could agree on.

Hence, the day after the e******n, Trump had before him two very different courses of action. He could accept the formal result of the e******n, highlight the sanctity of democratic procedure, and use his continuing leadership of the Republican Party to push for reform — and perhaps for another run in 2024. Or he could fan the flames of popular fury, further undermine the people’s trust in our democratic institutions, and risk all in a desperate gambit to benefit himself.

Tragically for all of us, he chose the latter course. He took little interest in the crucial runoff e******ns looming in the state of Georgia, on which depended the GOP’s continued control of the Senate. This was tragedy at its finest, because only a GOP Senate could now protect many of Trump’s greatest achievements, such as the tax reform of 2017. And GOP control of the Senate would be vital in addressing all that went wrong in the 2020 e******n.

But Trump and his more fanatical supporters demanded fealty to his increasingly theatrical attempts to reverse the results of the e******n, instigating a civil war within the Republican Party. Leading Trump supporters promised that Republicans who didn’t join the farce would be “finished forever.” Thus, in a childish temper tantrum over losing the White House, Trump dead-enders threw away control of the Senate, a stupid and unforgivable betrayal of the Republican Party. It was the fanatical Trumpers’ most shameful moment, and recalls Octavius Caesar’s final indictment of Antony: “’Tis to be chid— / As we rate boys who, being mature in knowledge, / Pawn their experience to their present pleasure, / And so rebel to judgment.”

But worse was to come. Rather than focus his energies on the January 5 runoff e******n in Georgia, Trump instead staged a massive rally for himself the following day in Washington, D.C., in a final desperate bid to get then-Vice President Pence to cancel the certification of e*****rs and reverse the e******n result. The horrifying images of Trump’s rabble storming the Capitol, leaving five people dead, will forever shame his legacy.

Certainly he did not intend it. But if it was not a foreseeable result of all he did and said up until then, it was weirdly inevitable, like the bloodbath at the end of Hamlet.

The tragedy of Trump is that his hubris led him to betray the very tens of millions of v**ers whose trust and loyalty he had rightly won. Alas, there is an inescapable conflict between vanity and greatness, a t***h we have forgotten along with the Tragedy of Coriolanus.

As Aristotle wrote in the Poetics, the tragic protagonist’s “misfortune is brought about not by vice or depravity, but by some error or frailty.” It is not always easy to feel sorry for someone who brings about his own downfall. But therein lies the power of tragedy.
The National Review, By Mario Loyola...from Januar... (show quote)


There was no 'tragic' fall for Donald Trump. From my perspective, it was (and is) the rise of Donald Trump that is the tragedy. The author's sympathy for the 's****n e******n' narrative does not let him see that the fall was a decision by the American people to correct their mistake. The hubris the author concerns himself with was there for all to see from the beginning, starting with the golden escalator. The hubris led to his rise. His clear preference for authoritarian rule led to his demise.

Reply
Jul 13, 2021 10:48:24   #
Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial
 
vernon wrote:
You don't know Trump ,just the lies that the RATS have been putting out since 2016. Most of it has been proven a lie but some die hards hang on just out of pure h**e,which was created by scags like pelosi and schumer.


You mean the lies since the 70s? Except they're true. Trump is a con man extraordinaire.

Reply
Jul 13, 2021 10:49:31   #
vernon
 
slatten49 wrote:
No disagreement with you on this. Trump remains being his own worst enemy.


Trump doesn't take the lies with out answering them. If that is being his own worst enemy so be it. It at least shows what liars and thieves these RATS are. Anyone can take some article that tries to convince people that Trump is wrong and use it to attack him.

Reply
Jul 13, 2021 10:57:18   #
vernon
 
Tiptop789 wrote:
You mean the lies since the 70s? Except they're true. Trump is a con man extraordinaire.


Your problem is you have been coned by the worst scoundrels every to gain leadership any organization in this country .They have stolen millions and cost us more in personal and national treasure than any group in history.-

Reply
 
 
Jul 13, 2021 11:05:57   #
Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
 
slatten49 wrote:
The National Review, By Mario Loyola...from January 21, 2021

Like in a tale from Shakespeare, he brought it on himself.

Webster’s Third New International Dictionary defines hubris as “overweening p***e or self-confidence: arrogance.” It is a quality the celebrity billionaire Donald Trump had long possessed, to an often-entertaining degree. But the comedy was merely prologue for an epic rise to power that nobody could have foreseen — nobody except himself, of course. What was perhaps more foreseeable, at least in retrospect, was the tragic fall.

In literature, a “tragic hero” has to be larger-than-life, but he needn’t be particularly sympathetic. Shakespeare’s tragic heroes run the gamut from those we couldn’t care less about, such as Antony and Cleopatra, to the frustrating Hamlet, to those, like Othello and above all King Lear, whose stories are almost unbearably sad. What they all have in common is some terrible flaw that dooms them to make a terrible mistake.

Trump is certainly larger than life, but is he a sympathetic character? On one end, tens of millions of Americans won’t feel satisfied until Trump is rotting in prison. On the other, tens of millions see him as every bit the hero, protecting them and America itself from the forces of evil and corruption, an underdog who wins against the odds, while suffering the vilest abuses and betrayals. Still others see varying degrees of good in him, but can’t help being dismayed or revolted by his gratuitous insults, self-inflicted injuries, and myriad of other foibles.

However much you love him — or don’t — there is no denying his major character flaw: a crippling degree of vanity. Consider this exchange with Chris Wallace, from a July 2020 Fox News Sunday interview. At the end, Wallace asks, “Whether it’s in 2021 or 2025, how will you regard your years as president of the United States?”

It was the softest of softballs, which any normal politician would have answered by expressing gratitude at the opportunity to serve the country, and what a wonderful country, etc. Here is how Trump answered the question:

TRUMP: I think I was very unfairly treated. From before I even won I was under investigation by a bunch of thieves, crooks. It was an illegal investigation.

WALLACE: But what about the good —

TRUMP: Russia, Russia, Russia.

WALLACE: But what about the good parts, sir?

TRUMP: No, no. I want to go [into] this. I have done more than any president in history in the first three and a half years, and I’ve done it suffering through investigations where people have been — General Flynn, where people have been so unfairly treated.

The Russia h**x, it was all a h**x. The Mueller s**m, it was all s**m. It was all false. I made a bad decision on — one bad decision. Jeff Sessions, and now I feel good because he lost overwhelmingly in the great state of Alabama.

Here’s the bottom line. I’ve been very unfairly treated, and I don’t say that as paranoid. I’ve been very — everybody says it . . .

This is literary material, almost as good as the passages that Shakespeare lifted whole from Holinshed’s Chronicles of England or Plutarch’s Parallel Lives. It shows how vanity diminishes the character proportionately. If only Trump had been a bit more humbled by the honor of the presidency, how much greater he might have been!

His tragic flaw thus illustrated, here was his terrible mistake: After the e******n, instead of focusing on his supporters’ legitimate concerns about the e*******l process, he made it all about himself. Convinced, rightly or wrongly, that the e******n had been stolen, Trump fixated ferociously on the idea that it had been stolen from him.

During the 2020 e******n cycle, and indeed during most of Trump’s presidency, Big Tech and the media openly manipulated the flow of information to benefit Democrats, suppressing legitimate news that would hurt Democrats and amplifying misinformation (such as the Russia-Trump collusion h**x) that would hurt Republicans. And after years of Democrats’ pushing relentlessly to loosen e******n-integrity laws, such as v**er-ID requirements, many states enacted mail-in v****g and other loose rules for conducting the e******n in the midst of a p******c, all in ways that seemed calculated to benefit Democrats, however sincere the “social justice” reasons.

It was both foreseeable and understandable that tens of millions of people would emerge from the e******n thinking that it had been stolen, and Democrats would be more convincing if they acted a bit less surprised, given their own role in staging the drama. BUT HERE IS THE POINT: EVEN IF THE E******N WERE STOLEN, IT WAS NOT STOLEN FROM TRUMP; IT WAS STOLEN FROM THE V**ERS. If the e******n was dubious, the remedy was not to reverse it by even-more-dubious means, which could only divide the nation even more bitterly, but rather to highlight the problems and to push for solutions that Americans could agree on.

Hence, the day after the e******n, Trump had before him two very different courses of action. He could accept the formal result of the e******n, highlight the sanctity of democratic procedure, and use his continuing leadership of the Republican Party to push for reform — and perhaps for another run in 2024. Or he could fan the flames of popular fury, further undermine the people’s trust in our democratic institutions, and risk all in a desperate gambit to benefit himself.

Tragically for all of us, he chose the latter course. He took little interest in the crucial runoff e******ns looming in the state of Georgia, on which depended the GOP’s continued control of the Senate. This was tragedy at its finest, because only a GOP Senate could now protect many of Trump’s greatest achievements, such as the tax reform of 2017. And GOP control of the Senate would be vital in addressing all that went wrong in the 2020 e******n.

But Trump and his more fanatical supporters demanded fealty to his increasingly theatrical attempts to reverse the results of the e******n, instigating a civil war within the Republican Party. Leading Trump supporters promised that Republicans who didn’t join the farce would be “finished forever.” Thus, in a childish temper tantrum over losing the White House, Trump dead-enders threw away control of the Senate, a stupid and unforgivable betrayal of the Republican Party. It was the fanatical Trumpers’ most shameful moment, and recalls Octavius Caesar’s final indictment of Antony: “’Tis to be chid— / As we rate boys who, being mature in knowledge, / Pawn their experience to their present pleasure, / And so rebel to judgment.”

But worse was to come. Rather than focus his energies on the January 5 runoff e******n in Georgia, Trump instead staged a massive rally for himself the following day in Washington, D.C., in a final desperate bid to get then-Vice President Pence to cancel the certification of e*****rs and reverse the e******n result. The horrifying images of Trump’s rabble storming the Capitol, leaving five people dead, will forever shame his legacy.

Certainly he did not intend it. But if it was not a foreseeable result of all he did and said up until then, it was weirdly inevitable, like the bloodbath at the end of Hamlet.

The tragedy of Trump is that his hubris led him to betray the very tens of millions of v**ers whose trust and loyalty he had rightly won. Alas, there is an inescapable conflict between vanity and greatness, a t***h we have forgotten along with the Tragedy of Coriolanus.

As Aristotle wrote in the Poetics, the tragic protagonist’s “misfortune is brought about not by vice or depravity, but by some error or frailty.” It is not always easy to feel sorry for someone who brings about his own downfall. But therein lies the power of tragedy.
The National Review, By Mario Loyola...from Januar... (show quote)


Hardly a demise. 98% of CPAC approved of his job performance and 74% said they they would v**e for him again in 2024. DeSantis was the next closest at 21%. Trump lost by 42k v**es across three states in an e******n which had, even at best case, a lot of irregularities and at worst case a ton of c***ting. Very few of his tens of millions of supporters feel betrayed. I can agree that his hubris can be viewed as his worst trait politically and also his best strength to withstand the constant attacks leveled at him.

Reply
Jul 13, 2021 11:41:58   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
working class stiff wrote:
There was no 'tragic' fall for Donald Trump. From my perspective, it was (and is) the rise of Donald Trump that is the tragedy. The author's sympathy for the 's****n e******n' narrative does not let him see that the fall was a decision by the American people to correct their mistake. The hubris the author concerns himself with was there for all to see from the beginning, starting with the golden escalator. The hubris led to his rise. His clear preference for authoritarian rule led to his demise.
There was no 'tragic' fall for Donald Trump. From... (show quote)

WCS, when posting an article via cut 'n paste, I honor the writer with a verbatim accounting...unless to correct an obvious spelling or grammatical error. That is very rare. I thought it was a particularly balanced accounting.

Reply
Jul 13, 2021 11:44:52   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
Strycker wrote:
Hardly a demise. 98% of CPAC approved of his job performance and 74% said they they would v**e for him again in 2024. DeSantis was the next closest at 21%. Trump lost by 42k v**es across three states in an e******n which had, even at best case, a lot of irregularities and at worst case a ton of c***ting. Very few of his tens of millions of supporters feel betrayed. I can agree that his hubris can be viewed as his worst trait politically and also his best strength to withstand the constant attacks leveled at him.
Hardly a demise. 98% of CPAC approved of his job p... (show quote)

A reasonable response...when keeping in mind that the 2016 e******n was lost by a similar v**e count in those same states and questionable circumstances.

Reply
Jul 13, 2021 11:55:00   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
slatten49 wrote:
WCS, when posting an article via cut 'n paste, I honor the writer with a verbatim accounting...unless to correct an obvious spelling or grammatical error. That is very rare. I thought it was a particularly balanced accounting.


I understand....I just have a different take on the tragedy of Trump.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.