Here’s a question that I’d like someone to answer: If, in the case of a******n, the woman’s body is hers to decide how it’s used, but, in the case of this CCP v***s v*****e, OUR bodies...

Carol Kelly

If, in the case of a******n, the woman’s body is hers to decide how it’s used, but, in the case of this CCP v***s v*****e, OUR bodies are not ours to decide how it’s used, why is that. Especially when we know that Roe vs Wade was a f**e case, how can we be forced to concede to the v*****e that we don’t know the contents. Just wondering if anyone can answer this question.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Carol Kelly wrote:

If, in the case of a******n, the woman’s body is hers to decide how it’s used, but, in the case of this CCP v***s v*****e, OUR bodies are not ours to decide how it’s used, why is that. Especially when we know that Roe vs Wade was a f**e case, how can we be forced to concede to the v*****e that we don’t know the contents. Just wondering if anyone can answer this question.

There is a difference. One is having something taken out. The other is having something put in. The only way a country can force you to put something in your body is the government must become tyrannical. Exactly what we see happening.

Carol Kelly

JFlorio wrote:

There is a difference. One is having something taken out. The other is having something put in. The only way a country can force you to put something in your body is the government must become tyrannical. Exactly what we see happening.

And that’s exactly my point. Thank you.

American Vet

Carol Kelly wrote:

If, in the case of a******n, the woman’s body is hers to decide how it’s used, .

The flaw in that logic is that the unborn baby is not part of her body. It is a separate, unique individual.

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

American Vet wrote:

The flaw in that logic is that the unborn baby is not part of her body. It is a separate, unique individual.

No it isn’t.
Where do you find this nonsense. It is part of her body and part of her life, and she is responsible for that baby until it turns 18. It is entirely hers. Not for you or anyone else to decide anything about.
Go find your own canoe, and leave her alone.
Jezzus. A separate individual????
Oh for flux sakes!

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

With a symbiotic relationship. Isn’t it amazing how progressives are supposedly all about science, but when science says the unborn feel pain and react to stimuli much earlier than previously thought, progressives either don’t believe it or don’t care.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

What are you babbling about now? Is the child an individual or not?the unborn are individuals. They have a symbiotic relationship with the mother.

Milosia2 wrote:

No it isn’t.
Where do you find this nonsense. It is part of her body and part of her life, and she is responsible for that baby until it turns 18. It is entirely hers. Not for you or anyone else to decide anything about.
Go find your own canoe, and leave her alone.
Jezzus. A separate individual????
Oh for flux sakes!

Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial

Carol Kelly wrote:

If, in the case of a******n, the woman’s body is hers to decide how it’s used, but, in the case of this CCP v***s v*****e, OUR bodies are not ours to decide how it’s used, why is that. Especially when we know that Roe vs Wade was a f**e case, how can we be forced to concede to the v*****e that we don’t know the contents. Just wondering if anyone can answer this question.

Many v*****es are mandatory, MMR, comes to mind. I haven't noticed that the c***d v*****e was mandatory? Roe vs wade f**e, ok, I'm sure you got that figured?

keepuphope Loc: Idaho

American Vet wrote:

The flaw in that logic is that the unborn baby is not part of her body. It is a separate, unique individual.

Every baby is unique no one like them one of a kind.They have their own finger prints at 14 weeks.Last week I read about a baby who when born weighed 14 ounces. That's not even a pound yet he lived and now thrives.They are human beings, not a clump of cells.Anyone who tells their self that is refusing to except science.Why not after their born beat them to death with a bat.Thats no different than k*****g them in the womb.Be sure to look them in the eyes as you do it.Dead is dead.

keepuphope Loc: Idaho

Milosia2 wrote:

No it isn’t.
Where do you find this nonsense. It is part of her body and part of her life, and she is responsible for that baby until it turns 18. It is entirely hers. Not for you or anyone else to decide anything about.
Go find your own canoe, and leave her alone.
Jezzus. A separate individual????
Oh for flux sakes!

H**e to inform you but babies are their own identity.They need the mother for nutrition and oxygen period.Completly their own body not part of the mother.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

Carol Kelly wrote:

If, in the case of a******n, the woman’s body is hers to decide how it’s used, but, in the case of this CCP v***s v*****e, OUR bodies are not ours to decide how it’s used, why is that. Especially when we know that Roe vs Wade was a f**e case, how can we be forced to concede to the v*****e that we don’t know the contents. Just wondering if anyone can answer this question.

A******n is a personal choice, v*****es are a community choice.

keepuphope Loc: Idaho

lpnmajor wrote:

A******n is a personal choice, v*****es are a community choice.

Your right it is a personal chose by the mother to k**l her child because she was irresponcible by not taking one of the hundreds of choices to prevent it. Then murder them because they don't want the responsibility of caring for them There is no excuse because there are many people waiting to adopt them. They don't want the inconveniences of carrying them to term.

debeda

Milosia2 wrote:

No it isn’t.
Where do you find this nonsense. It is part of her body and part of her life, and she is responsible for that baby until it turns 18. It is entirely hers. Not for you or anyone else to decide anything about.
Go find your own canoe, and leave her alone.
Jezzus. A separate individual????
Oh for flux sakes!

Oh? Are you not a separate individual from your mother? Do you know how silly you sound?

bggamers Loc: georgia

Carol Kelly wrote:

If, in the case of a******n, the woman’s body is hers to decide how it’s used, but, in the case of this CCP v***s v*****e, OUR bodies are not ours to decide how it’s used, why is that. Especially when we know that Roe vs Wade was a f**e case, how can we be forced to concede to the v*****e that we don’t know the contents. Just wondering if anyone can answer this question.

The a******n is a personal issue for a woman to decide. V*****e during a p******c is a to stop the spread of a virulent v***s is for the public good and incompasses thousands of people that could be impacted if they catch it

Smedley_buzkill

lpnmajor wrote:

A******n is a personal choice, v*****es are a community choice.

A******ns are a personal choice? All those unborn babies chose to die? Since when did they get a v**e? When a child develops a heartbeat and brain waves and can feel pain, it becomes a person.