it’s not “e******n f***d” it’s called TREASON.
Nov 21, 2021 15:42:51 #
jeff smith wrote:
what investigations ? br into his taxes all of the... (show quote)
How do you view the J****** 6th r**t Jeff Smith?
What is "fraudulent" about the investigation?
Nov 21, 2021 15:51:33 #
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
That is what I was asking you. Who is the rapper? When/where did it occur?
Reread my post. Who, what, when, where is in it.
Nov 21, 2021 15:52:01 #
jeff smith wrote:
what investigations ? br into his taxes all of the... (show quote)
AGREED, Jeff👍👍👍👍👍
Nov 21, 2021 16:13:10 #
debeda wrote:
Reread my post. Who, what, when, where is in it.
It's quite vague, your post. Any specifics?
Nov 21, 2021 16:19:43 #
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
It's quite vague, your post. Any specifics?
Please link the post you call 'vague', useful mattoid 45.
I want to see what is in the post that you are ignoring. --Inviting some possibly time-wasting clarification. Stalling for time and taking us down red herring paths is a losing strategy.
Nov 21, 2021 16:30:32 #
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
It's quite vague, your post. Any specifics?
Public knowledge. Look it up if you want specifics. And while you're at it, look up the footage of the Kenosha occurrences and subsequent trial so you know WTH you're talking about.
Nov 21, 2021 16:30:48 #
whole2th wrote:
Please link the post you call 'vague', useful mattoid 45.
I want to see what is in the post that you are ignoring. --Inviting some possibly time-wasting clarification. Stalling for time and taking us down red herring paths is a losing strategy.
I want to see what is in the post that you are ignoring. --Inviting some possibly time-wasting clarification. Stalling for time and taking us down red herring paths is a losing strategy.
👍👍👍
Nov 22, 2021 19:00:03 #
whole2th wrote:
Please link the post you call 'vague', useful mattoid 45.
I want to see what is in the post that you are ignoring. --Inviting some possibly time-wasting clarification. Stalling for time and taking us down red herring paths is a losing strategy.
I want to see what is in the post that you are ignoring. --Inviting some possibly time-wasting clarification. Stalling for time and taking us down red herring paths is a losing strategy.
Go back and look yourself.
Nov 22, 2021 19:02:31 #
whole2th wrote:
Please link the post you call 'vague', useful mattoid 45.
I want to see what is in the post that you are ignoring. --Inviting some possibly time-wasting clarification. Stalling for time and taking us down red herring paths is a losing strategy.
I want to see what is in the post that you are ignoring. --Inviting some possibly time-wasting clarification. Stalling for time and taking us down red herring paths is a losing strategy.
Go back and look yourself.
She had a name (maybe), a time frame (last year) and a state (NC).
Guess that's sufficient evidence for some.
Nov 22, 2021 22:14:44 #
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
Go back and look yourself.
I searched and couldn’t find a post that fits your characterisation.
Perhaps your “vague” characterisation is too weak for you to want to show us?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.