The Fear Factor Failure: See who's "Extremely Concerned", and who's Not, if You Dare! https://civiqs.com/results/c****av***s_concern?uncertainty=true&annotations=true&zoomIn=true...

Gatsby

See who's "Extremely Concerned", and who's Not, if You Dare!

https://civiqs.com/results/c****av***s_concern?uncertainty=true&annotations=true&zoomIn=true

Ricktloml

Gatsby wrote:

See who's "Extremely Concerned", and who's Not, if You Dare!

https://civiqs.com/results/c****av***s_concern?uncertainty=true&annotations=true&zoomIn=true

I did not accept the panic mongering from the start.

Gatsby

Ricktloml wrote:

I did not accept the panic mongering from the start.

It should be interesting, to see if the 10% Dares to Look.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Gatsby wrote:

See who's "Extremely Concerned", and who's Not, if You Dare!

https://civiqs.com/results/c****av***s_concern?uncertainty=true&annotations=true&zoomIn=true

Interesting graphic, I wish my computer did a better job, would watch for a while..

seems in Minnesota, as expected 73% did not give a darn.. about what I would have predicted..

Will try to look at more, when the traffic slacks a bit..

but i have to ask, what is your point?.. you and I are far apart at the table, i do not think you posted this only because it is interesting..

Gatsby

permafrost wrote:

Interesting graphic, I wish my computer did a better job, would watch for a while..

seems in Minnesota, as expected 73% did not give a darn.. about what I would have predicted..

Will try to look at more, when the traffic slacks a bit..

but i have to ask, what is your point?.. you and I are far apart at the table, i do not think you posted this only because it is interesting..

OK, just maybe I just wanted to see how the 10% would react, when exposed to reality.