Your opinion also suffers from the assumption that a 'crime' has been committed in the Biden e******n. It's pretty easy to turn that around and say that the 'crime' is in trying to overturn a certified American e******n.

It's pretty ingenious to equate the death of unarmed black men at the hands of police with the death of American liberty because if those dead folks could talk I'm betting they would agree with you.

That has nothing, nothing to do with a stolen or r****d e******n....something that has not been proven or even close to proven. It's a fantasy in the head of Trump and his supporters. You talk about the illogic of the left. I would suggest you start with your own illogic. The Trumpists have proven NOTHING. Just asserted their fantasy and then try to impugn the integrity of those who do not share their hallucination.

It's so hard to take seriously your accusations when you have no evidence or proof of any wrongdoing by anyone. Spare us any more attempts at clarification....

Thanks for proving my points. For the left, holding anyone on the left accountable should be a crime, as you’ve just said. (Conservatives are calling for audits, and that is likened to a crime to you. No sense at all trying to reason with you folks). But them (that’s you) holding conservative Americans accountable shouldn’t even require a trial if they are already counted guilty by the l*****t mob. That’s the way you hypocrites roll.

As for your second paragraph, obviously you either didn’t read or didn’t understand the second paragraph of the original post. That was where the comparison was clearly explained. Obviously, it went right over your head. Again proving my point that anything that doesn’t fit your narrative can’t even pierce the “immunity to reason” you’ve inoculated yourselves with by your double standards.

Unfortunately, this post didn’t have the effect on l*****ts it should have.
Let me take a stab at why I think that is.

The logic in the OP is based on false equivalency.

You see, this analogy assumes that it would be possible for the l*****t mind to “equate” the death of “American liberty” with the death of an “innocent black man”.

That is because, well, two reasons actually, first, for the left mindset, America is “systematically r****t”, therefore, in their twisted reasoning, cannot even be conceived of at all by them as somehow being “innocent” to begin with (in fact it’s questionable if l*****ts even value “liberty” as being a “virtue” at all; based on their actions, it’s clearly not an important one of any priority at all). Secondly, all B****s being accosted by cops are already determined by l*****ts to be victims based on the inherent “institutional r****m” against such that could only be the cause (in their mind) why an LEO would even accost a POC, to begin with. Thus the plain logic of the post is simply lost on the l*****t mind. It may as well have been written in Swahili.

Furthermore, for l*****ts, the death of a black person, or any other person of color, is only important if it is perpetrated by a white LEO, (or any other person, including another POC, that has been brainwashed and indoctrinated by whom they have already predetermined and labeled as “w***e s*********ts”). This is made abundantly clear by how they can magnify the extent of “innocent” b****s k**led by cops and practically totally ignore the huge amount of b****s k**led by other b****s. Therefore, the death of “American liberty” to a Marxist liberal can be more reasonably equated to something as inconsequential to then as the death of any POC in, for example, the ghettos by other POC's, or by a******n. The article thus falsely assumes that l*****ts could possibly have any sympathy or loyalty or even appreciation for “American liberty” to begin with.

Bottom line is, the major failure, (in this otherwise extremely logical attempt at reasoning with l*****ts on their own level), grossly underestimates the “immunity to reason” the left has inoculated themselves with by their ability to apply “double standards” at will against any reasonable attacks against their ideology. The only rule they play by with alternative viewpoints is, heads we win, tails you lose. That imbalance is precisely what the OP attempted to balance, but fails on that very score!

It is a major shortcoming in such an exchange that conservatives maintain their conviction to do unto others as they would have others do to them. L*****ts have no such moral convictions, there is only their agenda of ideology at all cost.

When the ends justify the means, as it is with l*****ts and their Marxist agenda, anything that contradicts or challenges their agenda is by that fact alone to be negated out of hand. No reasoning to the contrary is even allowed, let alone entertained.

And that is why any and all such reasoning with l*****ts is futile.

So, the l*****t mind twists the original post to be, in their view, evidence enough for them against the view on the part of the author of the article. Why? Because it was written against supporting their agenda, and that is all they need to know. Their bigotry is thus enforced, rather than challenged, as was intended by the original post. Why? Because anything that challenges their agenda is by that fact alone evidence to them of an inferior mind that can’t even grasp their “higher purpose” of “social justice”. And therefore any defense of their agenda on their part, no matter how illogical or unsubstantiated or immoral, or even <gasp> r****t on their part, is superior to any conservative position, no matter how logical, constitutional or moral. Because for them the ends justify the means. That’s why calling for and supporting non-peaceful r**ting on their part is virtuous, but the resistance of any kind against their agenda is to be renounced as r*******n and anarchy and punished to the full extent of the law and public peer pressure.

That is why only a personal moral awakening will ever be able to pierce the void of their “inoculation of immunity” from common sense and true, godly morals.

But that’s just my opinion.

Oh stop. The word crime was clearly in quotes. And the 'crime' isn't the audits. Never said it was. The 'crime' clearly has to do with the 'stolen or r****d e******n' assertion. I pointed out that the Republicans and Trump supporters have given no evidence or proof of this so-called crime.

What you call 'clearly explained' looks to me like an assertion of wishful thinking. Here we are, 6 months later, and Trump and the Republicans are still looking for evidence of a 'crime' that did not happen. I don't care if all 50 states' v**es are audited. Go ahead....do it. By then we'll be in the next e******n cycle.

I haven't inoculated myself to reason. When it comes to the subject at hand, the title of this thread, I'm just waiting for some. We went through an e******n process during trying times, that e******n was certified as just as safe and secure as any American e******n before it, except for the losers of that e******n. For them, everyone who doesn't accept their unproven assertion is corrupt or guilty.

I don't buy it. Remember back when Trump was elected and you all had so much fun with the 'snowflakes' who were crying and yelling at the sky? That's what I'm reminded of now. I also find it interesting that I seem to have more faith in the American system than the 'patriots' who are in such an uproar.