One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
How long before Tucker Carlson is taken off the air, or has a fatal accident?
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
May 8, 2021 10:46:27   #
vernon
 
Michael10 wrote:
Myself, wife, son and extended family around 30, have all been v******ted with no ill effects, I'll take my chances with science and ignore the Tuckers of the world.


I'm 87 and my wife is 80 and we got the shots a few months ago and had no ill affects at all.

Reply
May 8, 2021 10:51:39   #
ChJoe
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
I urge ALL DEMOCRATS to PLEASE go get v******ted.


Me too! And right away!!

Reply
May 8, 2021 10:51:43   #
vernon
 
ACP45 wrote:
Tucker Carlson's latest show "TUCKER CARLSON: How Many Americans Have Died after Taking the C****-** V*****e?" seems to have hit a pretty sensitive nerve in the media.

Apparently asking a bunch of serious questions about the "jab", like how many people have died soon after getting the "jab" ( answer - near 3,700) is something you just are not allowed to do! Pointing out the inadequacies in the V***S reporting system is also not appreciated (V*****e A*****e E***t Reporting System - Historically only 1% of injuries are reported - https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf)

Compare US Government policy now compared to 1976 where 45 million people were innoculated against the Swine flu - 53 people died, and the v*****e program was halted because it was considered TOO RISKY!

BUT, BUT, BUT - C****-** is SO MUCH MORE DANGEROUS than the Swine flu!

Really? What is the survival rate according to the CDC?
"The survival rate for C***d19 is, therefore, roughly 99.9%. When using the state population as the denominator, the death rate is even lower, ranging from 36 to 247 deaths per 100,000. As at March 19, 2021, even with the doctored numbers and faulty tests, the CDC arrived at the following survival rates:
* Ages 0-17 99.998%
* Ages 18-49 99.95%
* Ages 50-64 99.4%
* Ages 65+ 91%
https://www.cdc.gov/c****av***s/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html

BUT, BUT, BUT... the v*****e "jab" a/k/a Gene Modification Therapy is 90% effective (you have been lead to believe) WRONG

Sifting through the numbers, we find that at best the P****r and M*****a messenger RNA injections, mis-labeled as “v*****es”, reduce one’s absolute risk of catching C***D by 0.7% and 1.1% respectively. Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33652582/
Meanwhile, reports suggest that in Israel, the “v*****e” k**ls 40 times as many old, and 260 times as many young as the v***s would have.

For those of you open minded enough to really listen to alternative points of view, I urge you to listen to Tucker's full 20 minute segement. https://grandmageri422.me/2021/05/06/tucker-carlson-how-many-americans-have-died-after-taking-the-c****-**-v*****e/

For the rest of you, I leave you with something else to consider - ”It is ”better to nurse a delicious FANCY Than GAG ON T***H.” - Michelangelo
Tucker Carlson's latest show "TUCKER CARLSON:... (show quote)


When we have the government get involved in medicine we have government results which are always bad.

Reply
 
 
May 8, 2021 14:04:41   #
Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial
 
ACP45 wrote:
Tucker Carlson's latest show "TUCKER CARLSON: How Many Americans Have Died after Taking the C****-** V*****e?" seems to have hit a pretty sensitive nerve in the media.

Apparently asking a bunch of serious questions about the "jab", like how many people have died soon after getting the "jab" ( answer - near 3,700) is something you just are not allowed to do! Pointing out the inadequacies in the V***S reporting system is also not appreciated (V*****e A*****e E***t Reporting System - Historically only 1% of injuries are reported - https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf)

Compare US Government policy now compared to 1976 where 45 million people were innoculated against the Swine flu - 53 people died, and the v*****e program was halted because it was considered TOO RISKY!

BUT, BUT, BUT - C****-** is SO MUCH MORE DANGEROUS than the Swine flu!

Really? What is the survival rate according to the CDC?
"The survival rate for C***d19 is, therefore, roughly 99.9%. When using the state population as the denominator, the death rate is even lower, ranging from 36 to 247 deaths per 100,000. As at March 19, 2021, even with the doctored numbers and faulty tests, the CDC arrived at the following survival rates:
* Ages 0-17 99.998%
* Ages 18-49 99.95%
* Ages 50-64 99.4%
* Ages 65+ 91%
https://www.cdc.gov/c****av***s/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html

BUT, BUT, BUT... the v*****e "jab" a/k/a Gene Modification Therapy is 90% effective (you have been lead to believe) WRONG

Sifting through the numbers, we find that at best the P****r and M*****a messenger RNA injections, mis-labeled as “v*****es”, reduce one’s absolute risk of catching C***D by 0.7% and 1.1% respectively. Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33652582/
Meanwhile, reports suggest that in Israel, the “v*****e” k**ls 40 times as many old, and 260 times as many young as the v***s would have.

For those of you open minded enough to really listen to alternative points of view, I urge you to listen to Tucker's full 20 minute segement. https://grandmageri422.me/2021/05/06/tucker-carlson-how-many-americans-have-died-after-taking-the-c****-**-v*****e/

For the rest of you, I leave you with something else to consider - ”It is ”better to nurse a delicious FANCY Than GAG ON T***H.” - Michelangelo
Tucker Carlson's latest show "TUCKER CARLSON:... (show quote)


Instead of spouting off your mouth, just don't get the v*****e. What do you think, everyone is going to change their minds based on your comments? At least get your facts correct. The CDC reports adverse v*****e effects through V***S (V*****e A*****e E***t Reporting System) and out of 245 million does given, there have been 4,178 deaths (.0017%). So, you have to decide which is the greater risk, death by inoculation ( .0017%) or sickness and/or by c***d, about 2%.

Reply
May 8, 2021 14:28:55   #
PeterS
 
TruePatriot49 wrote:
Michael, please get back to all of us in 42 to 48 weeks. That is the time period for reactions to start happening. Autoimmune diseases are the primary results from RNA messing with DNA.

Trump's been v******ted. You're telling me his RNA is going to mess with his DNA? I wonder what the result will be?

Reply
May 8, 2021 14:32:58   #
Rose42
 
Tiptop789 wrote:
Instead of spouting off your mouth, just don't get the v*****e. What do you think, everyone is going to change their minds based on your comments? At least get your facts correct. The CDC reports adverse v*****e effects through V***S (V*****e A*****e E***t Reporting System) and out of 245 million does given, there have been 4,178 deaths (.0017%). So, you have to decide which is the greater risk, death by inoculation ( .0017%) or sickness and/or by c***d, about 2%.


This is a forum. Why do YOU spout off? Think you’ve changed any minds based on upur comments? Not likely.

Reply
May 8, 2021 15:21:24   #
Michael10
 
Rose42 wrote:
This is a forum. Why do YOU spout off? Think you’ve changed any minds based on upur comments? Not likely.


This is a forum, that's why you spout off and he's probably changed about as many minds are you have.

Reply
 
 
May 8, 2021 16:56:34   #
Rose42
 
Michael10 wrote:
This is a forum, that's why you spout off and he's probably changed about as many minds are you have.


Thats why you spout off too and you’ve likely changed no minds either.

Reply
May 8, 2021 17:33:56   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
PeterS wrote:
And all conservatives not to!


Lol, irresistible!

Reply
May 8, 2021 18:35:44   #
Ricktloml
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Which science?


Did those who were injected read the literature they gave you when you were injected. It reads...the "v*****e" does not protect you from contracting the v***s, or from t***smitting it. It MAY reduce the symptoms if you do get C****-**. THAT is the "science"

And when they say "may", that means if you don't end up with anti-body dependent enhancement, (one of the main reasons the FDA refused to approve c****av***s v*****es.) These "v*****es are STILL NOT FDA approved, but big pharma didn't need approval for "emergency use". Big pharma is raking in BILLIONS of dollars, with NO accountability. Science? Yeah right

Reply
May 9, 2021 05:36:48   #
fullspinzoo
 
ACP45 wrote:
Tucker Carlson's latest show "TUCKER CARLSON: How Many Americans Have Died after Taking the C****-** V*****e?" seems to have hit a pretty sensitive nerve in the media.

Apparently asking a bunch of serious questions about the "jab", like how many people have died soon after getting the "jab" ( answer - near 3,700) is something you just are not allowed to do! Pointing out the inadequacies in the V***S reporting system is also not appreciated (V*****e A*****e E***t Reporting System - Historically only 1% of injuries are reported - https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf)

Compare US Government policy now compared to 1976 where 45 million people were innoculated against the Swine flu - 53 people died, and the v*****e program was halted because it was considered TOO RISKY!

BUT, BUT, BUT - C****-** is SO MUCH MORE DANGEROUS than the Swine flu!

Really? What is the survival rate according to the CDC?
"The survival rate for C***d19 is, therefore, roughly 99.9%. When using the state population as the denominator, the death rate is even lower, ranging from 36 to 247 deaths per 100,000. As at March 19, 2021, even with the doctored numbers and faulty tests, the CDC arrived at the following survival rates:
* Ages 0-17 99.998%
* Ages 18-49 99.95%
* Ages 50-64 99.4%
* Ages 65+ 91%
https://www.cdc.gov/c****av***s/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html

BUT, BUT, BUT... the v*****e "jab" a/k/a Gene Modification Therapy is 90% effective (you have been lead to believe) WRONG

Sifting through the numbers, we find that at best the P****r and M*****a messenger RNA injections, mis-labeled as “v*****es”, reduce one’s absolute risk of catching C***D by 0.7% and 1.1% respectively. Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33652582/
Meanwhile, reports suggest that in Israel, the “v*****e” k**ls 40 times as many old, and 260 times as many young as the v***s would have.

For those of you open minded enough to really listen to alternative points of view, I urge you to listen to Tucker's full 20 minute segement. https://grandmageri422.me/2021/05/06/tucker-carlson-how-many-americans-have-died-after-taking-the-c****-**-v*****e/

For the rest of you, I leave you with something else to consider - ”It is ”better to nurse a delicious FANCY Than GAG ON T***H.” - Michelangelo
Tucker Carlson's latest show "TUCKER CARLSON:... (show quote)


ACP45 - Check out B***hute and Dr Tenpenny if you want to be shocked into what I think is reality.

Reply
 
 
May 9, 2021 06:34:05   #
rjoeholl
 
microphor wrote:
at least he could get a wife.


Uh, Kevvie Boy IS a wife.

Reply
May 9, 2021 07:18:36   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
ACP45 - Check out B***hute and Dr Tenpenny if you want to be shocked into what I think is reality.


I've watched a number of her videos, and yes, the information is quite disturbing.

Reply
May 9, 2021 07:25:27   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
Ricktloml wrote:
Did those who were injected read the literature they gave you when you were injected. It reads...the "v*****e" does not protect you from contracting the v***s, or from t***smitting it. It MAY reduce the symptoms if you do get C****-**. THAT is the "science"

And when they say "may", that means if you don't end up with anti-body dependent enhancement, (one of the main reasons the FDA refused to approve c****av***s v*****es.) These "v*****es are STILL NOT FDA approved, but big pharma didn't need approval for "emergency use". Big pharma is raking in BILLIONS of dollars, with NO accountability. Science? Yeah right
Did those who were injected read the literature th... (show quote)


Exactly so. I would go one step further and maintain that the reason why HCQ needed to be maligned and discredited (in spite of F***i's own NIH's 2005 report on how effective it was on SARS) is that it NEEDED to be in order to allow the "Emergency Use" authorization designation.

Reply
May 9, 2021 08:04:09   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
SGM B wrote:
Good post, timely information. Thank you from a 73 year old “anti-vaxer” who always enjoys Tucker Carlson. 👍👍


Me too!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.