US Army Sings Israeli National Anthem (Page 3): You give relevance to a monster who murdered millions of people!.... :sm25:...

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

It was a copy and paste...

And accurate...

You give relevance to a monster who murdered millions of people!....

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

proud republican wrote:

You give relevance to a monster who murdered millions of people!....

I find misrepresentations distasteful...

And Hitler will be relevant for generations to come...

You live in a nation that ignored the plight of those people for years; indeed, that returned refugees fleeing Germany back to the N**is rather than provide them with sanctuary... How do you feel about that???

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

I find misrepresentations distasteful...

And Hitler will be relevant for generations to come...

You live in a nation that ignored the plight of those people for years; indeed, that returned refugees fleeing Germany back to the N**is rather than provide them with sanctuary... How do you feel about that???

Who was President back than?

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

proud republican wrote:

Who was President back than?

FDR...

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

FDR...

There your answer...He was Democrat...They h**e Jews...I dont know why so many Jews v**e Democrat....Its mind boggling.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Ginny_Dandy wrote:

"...the personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew.
-Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf)"

There it is!

Hitler somehow got his hands on the Talmud books. He recognized the evil that was printed there.

Astonishing, Ginny truly astonishing. A statement made by one of the most evil dictators in history turns you on.

And Hitler sees "the evil that was printed there"? Say what?

No, Ginny, Hitler didn't get his hands on the "Talmudic books", Hitler got his hands on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a plagiarized, anti-Semitic forgery authored by Russian secret police.

In 1923, Fyodor Vinberg arranged the t***slation and publication of the Protocols in Berlin. Alfred Rosenberg introduced the Protocols to Adolf Hitler at the birth of the N**i Party. The fiction of a Jewish conspiracy had practical value for Hitler and his party. A half-educated apostate autodidact like Hitler especially needed some structure on which to hang his anti-Semitic pathology. Hitler used the Protocols as the foundation for organizing his party's government.

"I have read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, it simply appalled me. The stealthiness of the enemy, and his ubiquity. I saw at once that we must copy it - in our own way, of course."
Adolf Hitler

"We owe the art of government to the Protocols, which the Fuhrer learned by heart."
Heinrich Himmler

On November 28, 1941, Adolf Hitler and the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, met at the Reich Chancellory in Berlin. What do you suppose they talked about?

Yeah, a solution to the Jewish problem. Hitler made the Grand Mufti a promise, enjoining him to lock it in the uttermost depths of his heart:

1. He (the Fuhrer) would carry on the battle to the total destruction of the Judeo-C*******t empire in Europe.

2. At some moment which was impossible to set exactly today but which in any event was not distant, the German armies would in the course of this struggle reach the southern exit from Caucasia.

3. As soon as this had happened, the Fuhrer would on his own give the Arab world the assurance that its hour of liberation had arrived. Germany’s objective would then be solely the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere under the protection of British power. In that hour the Mufti would be the most authoritative spokesman for the Arab world. It would then be his task to set off the Arab operations, which he had secretly prepared. When that time had come, Germany could also be indifferent to French reaction to such a declaration.

The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem raised two Muslim SS Divisions - The 13th Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Handschar (1st Croatian) and the 23rd Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Kama (2nd Croatian). These divisions were thrown into battle to help stop the Russian advance. They didn't do too well.

.

Muslims of the 13th Waffen SS Mountain Division at morning prayer.

Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest

Blade_Runner wrote:

Astonishing, Ginny truly astonishing. A statement ... (show quote)

https://educate-yourself.org/cn/protocolsofsion.shtml#top

The Protocols include the text of a document divided into 24 subheadings (protocols) that formed the subject of a lecture presented among the inner circle of Zion in French Masonic Lodges in the latter decades of the 19th century. Quoting from the booklet:

"The bases for this supposition are the following, namely: that Freemason policy follows the lines of the Protocols, and that S.A. Nilus tells us that the copy which came into his hands in 1901 bore the following inscription: "Signed by the Representatives of Zion of the 33rd Degree."

While the term "protocols" technically refers to the minutes of the proceedings of the Learned Elders of Zion, the document implies a blueprint or strategy to follow in order to achieve the desired goals stated within. The Protocols were a subject of discussion at the First Z*****t Congress held in Basel, Switzerland (spelled Basle at the time) from August 29-31 in 1897 (the Protocols were not conceived or created at the First Z*****t Congress as some have erroneously asserted). In 1884, the daughter of a Russian general living in Paris, Mademoiselle Justine Glinka, paid her assistant, Joseph Schoerst (alias Shapiro), a member of the Jewish Mizraim Masonic Lodge, the sum of 2,500 francs for a "document [which] contained extraordinary dictated writings from assorted speeches which would later be included in the final compilation of the Protocols of Zion." (Schoerst was murdered in Egypt within two months of selling his copy of the Protocols to Mademoiselle Glinka).

Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest

proud republican wrote:

There your answer...He was Democrat...They h**e Jews...I dont know why so many Jews v**e Democrat....Its mind boggling.

FDR was a Jew, too. A lot of Jews living in New York are Democrats.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Ginny_Dandy wrote:

FDR was a Jew, too. A lot of Jews living in New York are Democrats.

And I dont understand why.....I will NEVER be a Democrat!!

Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest

proud republican wrote:

And I dont understand why.....I will NEVER be a Democrat!!

I got active in the Republican Party when I lived in Everett, WA. We were so sure we were going to turn Washington State around away from the evil the Democrats were perpetrating on the people.
I met a lot of nice people and a lot of people I had suspicions about. But it was there that I met Tom, and he was also an adamant conservative.
I don't remember when or where we exchanged email addresses, but we started sending each other information. Several years passed before Tom finally told me that he's a Jew. It must've been one of my 'elitist Jew' rants that prompted him to come forward. Didn't make any difference in our friendship - we carried on as before. Today he sees what I saw - who the C*******ts are and their plan for the entire world. We're both on Facebook and, in spite of F*****tbook's censorship, we still manage to get some t***h out to our friends.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Ginny_Dandy wrote:

https://educate-yourself.org/cn/protocolsofsion.sh... (show quote)

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is the most notorious and widely distributed antisemitic publication of modern times. Its lies about Jews, which have been repeatedly discredited, continue to circulate today, especially on the Internet. The individuals and groups who have used the Protocols are all linked by a common purpose: to spread hatred of Jews.

The Protocols is entirely a work of fiction, intentionally written to blame Jews for a variety of ills. Those who distribute it claim that it documents a Jewish conspiracy to dominate the world. The conspiracy and its alleged leaders, the so-called Elders of Zion, never existed.

The Origin of a Lie

In 1903, portions of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were serialized in a Russian newspaper, Znamya (The Banner). The version of the Protocols that has endured and has been t***slated into dozens of languages, however, was first published in Russia in 1905 as an appendix to The Great in the Small: The Coming of the Anti-Christ and the Rule of Satan on Earth, by Russian writer and mystic Sergei Nilus.

Although the exact origin of the Protocols is unknown, its intent was to portray Jews as conspirators against the state. In 24 chapters, or protocols, allegedly minutes from meetings of Jewish leaders, the Protocols "describes" the "secret plans" of Jews to rule the world by manipulating the economy, controlling the media, and fostering religious conflict.

Following the Russian Revolution of 1917, anti-Bolshevik émigrés brought the Protocols to the West. Soon after, editions circulated across Europe, the United States, South America, and Japan. An Arabic t***slation first appeared in the 1920s.

Beginning in 1920, auto magnate Henry Ford's newspaper, The Dearborn Independent, published a series of articles based in part on the Protocols. The International Jew, the book that included this series, was t***slated into at least 16 languages. Both Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels, later head of the propaganda ministry, praised Ford and The International Jew.

Fraud Exposed

In 1921, the London Times presented conclusive proof that the Protocols was a "clumsy plagiarism." The Times confirmed that the Protocols had been copied in large part from a French political satire that never mentioned Jews—Maurice Joly's Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (1864). Other investigations revealed that one chapter of a Prussian novel, Hermann Goedsche's Biarritz (1868), also "inspired" the Protocols.

The N**i Era

N**i Party ideologue Alfred Rosenberg introduced Hitler to the Protocols during the early 1920s, as Hitler was developing his worldview. Hitler referred to the Protocols in some of his early political speeches, and, throughout his career, he exploited the myth that "Jewish-Bolshevists" were conspiring to control the world.

During the 1920s and 1930s, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion played an important part in the N**is' propaganda arsenal. The N**i party published at least 23 editions of the Protocols between 1919 and 1939. Following the N**is' seizure of power in 1933, some schools used the Protocols to indoctrinate students.

Fraud Exposed

In 1935, a Swiss court fined two N**i leaders for circulating a German-language edition of the Protocols in Berne, Switzerland. The presiding justice at the trial declared the Protocols "libelous," "obvious forgeries," and "ridiculous nonsense."

The US Senate issued a report in 1964 declaring that the Protocols were "fabricated." The Senate called the contents of the Protocols "gibberish" and criticized those who "peddled" the Protocols for using the same propaganda technique as Hitler.

In 1993, a Russian court ruled that Pamyat, a far-right nationalist organization, had committed an antisemitic act by publishing the Protocols.

Despite these repeated exposures of the Protocols as a fraud, it remains the most influential antisemitic text of the past one hundred years, and it continues to appeal to a variety of antisemitic individuals and groups.

The Protocols Today

According to the US Department of State's "Report on Global Anti-Semitism" (2004),

"The clear purpose of the Protocols is to incite hatred of Jews and of Israel."

In the United States and Europe, neo-N**is, w***e s*********ts, and Holocaust deniers endorse and circulate the Protocols. Books based on the Protocols are available worldwide, even in countries with hardly any Jews such as Japan.

Many school textbooks throughout the Arab and Islamic world teach the Protocols as fact. Countless political speeches, editorials, and even children's cartoons are derived from the Protocols. In 2002, Egypt's government-sponsored television aired a miniseries based on the Protocols, an event condemned by the US State Department. The Palestinian organization Hamas draws in part on the Protocols to justify its terrorism against Israeli civilians.

The Internet has dramatically increased access to the Protocols. Even though many websites expose the Protocols as a fraud, the Internet has made it easy to use the Protocols to spread hatred of Jews. Today, a typical Internet search yields several hundred thousand sites that disseminate, sell, or debate the Protocols or expose them as a fraud.

Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest

Carol Kelly wrote:

Im not criticizing any nation, especially Israel. They’ve put their hearts and souls and all their energies into building a beautiful place out of a barren desert. Admire what they’ve created...with God’s blessing.

Israel is stolen land!!! It belongs to the Palestinians! Israel used the money that the U.S. and other countries collected from taxpayers to build "a beautiful place."

https://interactive.aljazeera.com/aje/PalestineRemix/maps_main.html
VANISHING PALESTINE

To create the State of Israel, Z*****t forces attacked major Palestinian cities and destroyed some 530 villages. Approximately 13,000 Palestinians were k**led in 1948, with more than 750,000 expelled from their homes and becoming refugees – the climax of the Z*****t movement’s ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Today, the refugees and their descendants number more than seven million. Many still languish in refugee camps in neighbouring Arab countries, waiting to return to their homeland.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

proud republican wrote:

There your answer...He was Democrat...They h**e Jews...I dont know why so many Jews v**e Democrat....Its mind boggling.

FDR was for entering the war earlier...

Where did you get the idea that Democrats h**e Jews???

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

Ginny_Dandy wrote:

b Israel is stolen land!!! It belongs to the Pale... (show quote)

Now you get to hear about how there is no such thing as a Palestinian people...

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Ginny_Dandy wrote:

b Israel is stolen land!!! It belongs to the Pale... (show quote)

Though the definite origins of the word Palestine have been debated for years and are still not known for sure, the name is believed to be derived from the Egyptian and Hebrew word peleshet. Roughly t***slated to mean rolling or migratory, the term was used to describe the inhabitants of the land to the northeast of Egypt – the Philistines. The Philistines were an Aegean people – more closely related to the Greeks and with no connection ethnically, linguistically or historically with Arabia – who conquered in the 12th Century BCE the Mediterranean coastal plain that is now Israel and Gaza.

A derivative of the name Palestine first appears in Greek literature in the 5th Century BCE when the historian Herodotus called the area Palaistine. In the 2nd century CE, the Romans crushed the revolt of Shimon Bar Kokhba (132 CE), during which Jerusalem and Judea were regained and the area of Judea was renamed by the Roman Emperor Hadrian Palaestina in an attempt to minimize Jewish identification with the land of Israel.

Around the year 390, during the Byzantine period, the imperial province of Syria Palaestina was reorganized into Palaestina Prima, Palaestina Secunda and Palaestina Salutaris. Following the Muslim conquest, place names that were in use by the Byzantine administration generally continued to be used in Arabic and the use of the name “Palestine” became common in Early Modern English.

Under the Ottoman Empire (1517-1917), the term Palestine was used as a general term to describe the land south of Syria; it was not an official designation. In fact, many Ottomans and Arabs who lived in Palestine during this period referred to the area as Southern Syria and not as Palestine.

After World War I, the name Palestine was applied to the territory that was originally expected to be part of the British Mandate; this area included not only present-day Israel but also present-day Jordan. Jews living in Palestine typically referred to it as Eretz Yisrael in Hebrew but would identify as Palestinian Jews in English as reflected by institutions such as the Palestine Post newspaper (later the Jerusalem Post) and the Palestine Symphony Orchestra (later the Israel Philharmonic Orchestra).

Brian Schrauger noted:
During the 2,600 years those who lived in what the Roman Emperor Hadrian renamed Palestine were known as Palestinians, including Christians, Jews, Muslims, and people of any ethnic or religious affiliation. Accordingly, Palestinian did not describe any one ethnic or religious group. Its definition applied to anyone living in the territory, a certifiable historical fact all the way up to 1948 when Israel was reconstituted as a nation-state choosing to abandon Palestinian as the identifying name of its citizens, choosing Israeli instead. Most Muslims, with a variety of ethnic identities who remained in the land, kept the Palestinian designation.

Leading up to Israel’s independence in 1948, it was common for the international press to label Jews, not Arabs, living in the mandate as Palestinians. According to Zachary Foster, the first Arab to use the term “Palestinian” was Farid Georges Kassab, a Beirut-based Orthodox Christian who “noted in passing” in his 1909 book, Palestine, Hellenism, and Clericalism” that “‘the Orthodox Palestinian Ottomans call themselves Arabs, and are in fact Arabs,’ despite describing the Arabic speakers of Palestine as Palestinians throughout the rest of the book.”

Foster says the term was subsequently used in a few newspaper articles in 1910-1911. He argues that “In June 1913, the concept of a Palestinian identity began forming in the media, prompting Ottoman parliamentarian and Muslim Jerusalemite Ruhi al-Khalidi to write an article titled, “the Palestinian Race,” for the paper Filastin, arguing that Z*****ts were attempting to create an exclusionary society in Palestine.”

Six years later, the first “Arab Palestinian Congress” was held in 1919 during which David Margolis noted, the Arabs called for “Palestinian unity and independence, albeit still understanding Palestine as part of ‘Greater Syria.’”

The words “Palestine” or “Filastin” do not appear in the Koran. The term peleshet appears in the Jewish Tanakh no fewer than 250 times. It occurs at least eight times in eight verses of the Hebrew concordance of the King James Bible.