One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Why can't Democrats count?
May 4, 2021 23:12:53   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
They can't count v**es and they can't count people accurately for the census and representative apportionment. The left controls the Democratic party and they lie, c***t, and steal because their ends justify their means.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/why-did-the-biden-census-bureau-add-2-5-million-more-residents-to-blue-state-population-count

Why did the Biden Census Bureau add 2.5 million more residents to blue state population count?
by Stephen Moore
May 03, 2021


There is something very fishy about the new 2020 Census Bureau data determining which states picked up seats and those that lost seats.

Most of the revisions to the original estimates have moved in one direction: population gains were added to blue states, and population losses were subtracted from red states. The December revisions in population estimates under the Biden Census Bureau added some 2.5 million blue state residents and subtracted more than 500,000 red state residents. These population estimates determine how many e*******l v**es each state receives for p**********l e******ns and the number of congressional seats in each state.

Is this a mere coincidence?

Remember, the House of Representatives is razor-thin today, with the Democrats sporting just a three-seat majority with five seats currently vacant. So a switch in three or four seats in 2022 e******ns could flip the House and take the gavel away from current Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats. A population shift of 3 million is the equivalent of four seats moving from R to D.

A conversation with Douglas Holtz-Eakin of the American Action Forum
The original projections for the census reapportionment had New York losing two seats, Rhode Island losing a seat, and Illinois perhaps losing two seats. Instead, New York and Illinois only lose one seat, and Rhode Island loses no seats. Meanwhile, Texas was expected to gain three seats, Florida two seats, and Arizona one seat. Instead, Texas gains only two seats, Florida only one, and Arizona none.

Was the Census Bureau count r****d? Was it manipulated by the Biden team to hand more seats to the Democrats and to get more money (federal spending is often allocated based on population) for the blue states?

The evidence is now only circumstantial, but when errors or revisions are almost all only in one direction, the alarm bells appropriately go off.

Here are some of the strange outcomes in the census revisions just released:

1) New York — We’ve been tracking the annual population/migration changes between states since the last census of 2010. According to census data over the past decade, New York lost about 1.3 million residents on net to other states. (This does not include immigration, births, and deaths.) Still, this is a population loss equivalent to two, maybe three, lost congressional seats. But the final numbers ADDED more than 860,000. That’s roughly twice the population of Buffalo and Rochester — combined. This is the state that has lost by far the largest population over the past decade.

2) Many deep blue states had 2020 census numbers significantly revised upward from their December estimates: Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

3) Many red states had 2020 census numbers significantly lower than their 2020 estimates: Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas.

4) Going back to the 2010 census, the final headcount in every state was within 0.4% of the original estimate, and 30 of them were within 0.2%. This time around, 19 states were more than 1% off, 7 were more than 2% off, NY was more than 3.8% off, and NJ was more than 4.5% off.

5) Virtually every one of the significant deviations from the estimates favored Democrats. Just five states in the 2020 census were within the same margin (0.41%) that all states were within from the 2010 census.

Maybe the 2010 estimates were a******lly accurate, or perhaps the 2020 estimates were unusually inaccurate. The Census Bureau needs to tell Congress why these revisions under Obama were so much more significant than usual and weighted in one direction: toward the blue Biden states.

Reply
May 5, 2021 00:52:38   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
dtucker300 wrote:
They can't count v**es and they can't count people accurately for the census and representative apportionment. The left controls the Democratic party and they lie, c***t, and steal because their ends justify their means.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/why-did-the-biden-census-bureau-add-2-5-million-more-residents-to-blue-state-population-count

Why did the Biden Census Bureau add 2.5 million more residents to blue state population count?
by Stephen Moore
May 03, 2021


There is something very fishy about the new 2020 Census Bureau data determining which states picked up seats and those that lost seats.

Most of the revisions to the original estimates have moved in one direction: population gains were added to blue states, and population losses were subtracted from red states. The December revisions in population estimates under the Biden Census Bureau added some 2.5 million blue state residents and subtracted more than 500,000 red state residents. These population estimates determine how many e*******l v**es each state receives for p**********l e******ns and the number of congressional seats in each state.

Is this a mere coincidence?

Remember, the House of Representatives is razor-thin today, with the Democrats sporting just a three-seat majority with five seats currently vacant. So a switch in three or four seats in 2022 e******ns could flip the House and take the gavel away from current Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats. A population shift of 3 million is the equivalent of four seats moving from R to D.

A conversation with Douglas Holtz-Eakin of the American Action Forum
The original projections for the census reapportionment had New York losing two seats, Rhode Island losing a seat, and Illinois perhaps losing two seats. Instead, New York and Illinois only lose one seat, and Rhode Island loses no seats. Meanwhile, Texas was expected to gain three seats, Florida two seats, and Arizona one seat. Instead, Texas gains only two seats, Florida only one, and Arizona none.

Was the Census Bureau count r****d? Was it manipulated by the Biden team to hand more seats to the Democrats and to get more money (federal spending is often allocated based on population) for the blue states?

The evidence is now only circumstantial, but when errors or revisions are almost all only in one direction, the alarm bells appropriately go off.

Here are some of the strange outcomes in the census revisions just released:

1) New York — We’ve been tracking the annual population/migration changes between states since the last census of 2010. According to census data over the past decade, New York lost about 1.3 million residents on net to other states. (This does not include immigration, births, and deaths.) Still, this is a population loss equivalent to two, maybe three, lost congressional seats. But the final numbers ADDED more than 860,000. That’s roughly twice the population of Buffalo and Rochester — combined. This is the state that has lost by far the largest population over the past decade.

2) Many deep blue states had 2020 census numbers significantly revised upward from their December estimates: Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

3) Many red states had 2020 census numbers significantly lower than their 2020 estimates: Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas.

4) Going back to the 2010 census, the final headcount in every state was within 0.4% of the original estimate, and 30 of them were within 0.2%. This time around, 19 states were more than 1% off, 7 were more than 2% off, NY was more than 3.8% off, and NJ was more than 4.5% off.

5) Virtually every one of the significant deviations from the estimates favored Democrats. Just five states in the 2020 census were within the same margin (0.41%) that all states were within from the 2010 census.

Maybe the 2010 estimates were a******lly accurate, or perhaps the 2020 estimates were unusually inaccurate. The Census Bureau needs to tell Congress why these revisions under Obama were so much more significant than usual and weighted in one direction: toward the blue Biden states.
They can't count v**es and they can't count people... (show quote)



Here’s the bottom line...
45 lost.
Get over it,
for your own mental health.
The people won.
Reevaluate your true priorities and get with who you think will help the most to get there.
Ditch the negativity!
Be positive, choose positive actions.

Reply
May 5, 2021 00:59:25   #
Radiance3
 
dtucker300 wrote:
They can't count v**es and they can't count people accurately for the census and representative apportionment. The left controls the Democratic party and they lie, c***t, and steal because their ends justify their means.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/why-did-the-biden-census-bureau-add-2-5-million-more-residents-to-blue-state-population-count

Why did the Biden Census Bureau add 2.5 million more residents to blue state population count?
by Stephen Moore
May 03, 2021


There is something very fishy about the new 2020 Census Bureau data determining which states picked up seats and those that lost seats.

Most of the revisions to the original estimates have moved in one direction: population gains were added to blue states, and population losses were subtracted from red states. The December revisions in population estimates under the Biden Census Bureau added some 2.5 million blue state residents and subtracted more than 500,000 red state residents. These population estimates determine how many e*******l v**es each state receives for p**********l e******ns and the number of congressional seats in each state.

Is this a mere coincidence?

Remember, the House of Representatives is razor-thin today, with the Democrats sporting just a three-seat majority with five seats currently vacant. So a switch in three or four seats in 2022 e******ns could flip the House and take the gavel away from current Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats. A population shift of 3 million is the equivalent of four seats moving from R to D.

A conversation with Douglas Holtz-Eakin of the American Action Forum
The original projections for the census reapportionment had New York losing two seats, Rhode Island losing a seat, and Illinois perhaps losing two seats. Instead, New York and Illinois only lose one seat, and Rhode Island loses no seats. Meanwhile, Texas was expected to gain three seats, Florida two seats, and Arizona one seat. Instead, Texas gains only two seats, Florida only one, and Arizona none.

Was the Census Bureau count r****d? Was it manipulated by the Biden team to hand more seats to the Democrats and to get more money (federal spending is often allocated based on population) for the blue states?

The evidence is now only circumstantial, but when errors or revisions are almost all only in one direction, the alarm bells appropriately go off.

Here are some of the strange outcomes in the census revisions just released:

1) New York — We’ve been tracking the annual population/migration changes between states since the last census of 2010. According to census data over the past decade, New York lost about 1.3 million residents on net to other states. (This does not include immigration, births, and deaths.) Still, this is a population loss equivalent to two, maybe three, lost congressional seats. But the final numbers ADDED more than 860,000. That’s roughly twice the population of Buffalo and Rochester — combined. This is the state that has lost by far the largest population over the past decade.

2) Many deep blue states had 2020 census numbers significantly revised upward from their December estimates: Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

3) Many red states had 2020 census numbers significantly lower than their 2020 estimates: Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas.

4) Going back to the 2010 census, the final headcount in every state was within 0.4% of the original estimate, and 30 of them were within 0.2%. This time around, 19 states were more than 1% off, 7 were more than 2% off, NY was more than 3.8% off, and NJ was more than 4.5% off.

5) Virtually every one of the significant deviations from the estimates favored Democrats. Just five states in the 2020 census were within the same margin (0.41%) that all states were within from the 2010 census.

Maybe the 2010 estimates were a******lly accurate, or perhaps the 2020 estimates were unusually inaccurate. The Census Bureau needs to tell Congress why these revisions under Obama were so much more significant than usual and weighted in one direction: toward the blue Biden states.
They can't count v**es and they can't count people... (show quote)

====================
Most of the democrats are made up of dumb and violent people. The only way they could win the e******n is thru c***ting, commit massive fraud, and thru violence. That's what they did during the Nov. 2020 e******n. They will do this again unless we get rid of these dumb and violent people. They are populated by evil and violent people.

Reply
 
 
May 5, 2021 01:47:15   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Here’s the bottom line...
45 lost.
Get over it,
for your own mental health.
The people won.
Reevaluate your true priorities and get with who you think will help the most to get there.
Ditch the negativity!
Be positive, choose positive actions.


I'm positive! I'm positive the Democratic party is pure evil and wants to destroy our constitutional republic. My true priority is to make sure mentally ill f*****ts such as you never take over America. I took positive action 50 years ago when I swore an oath to uphold, defend, and protect the Constitution of the United States from all enemies both foreign and domestic. That oath still holds true for me. The Democratic Party and many RINO Republicans have succumbed to the propaganda of the left. You are one very sick person. You can't fool all the people all of the time. Your true colors are shining through. Be glad we have never met in person. I'm more than happy to expose the crazy Marxists people such as you who are on the left, and who have no gratitude for winning the world lottery to live in America, the last best hope for mankind. You don't think you need to earn anything, do anything to make America better, nor do you have any gratitude for what people before you have done to make this the greatest country in history.

Reply
May 5, 2021 01:57:22   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Radiance3 wrote:
====================
Most of the democrats are made up of dumb and violent people. The only way they could win the e******n is thru c***ting, commit massive fraud, and thru violence. That's what they did during the Nov. 2020 e******n. They will do this again unless we get rid of these dumb and violent people. They are populated by evil and violent people.


They get their news from ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS (Pravda West), and the rest of the left-wing-dominated news agencies (TASS) who only regurgitate the press releases given to them by the government propagandists. Most of these news-readers couldn't investigate their way out of a wet bag and are mostly left-wing mouthpieces.

Reply
May 5, 2021 07:17:48   #
Radiance3
 
dtucker300 wrote:
They get their news from ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS (Pravda West), and the rest of the left-wing-dominated news agencies (TASS) who only regurgitate the press releases given to them by the government propagandists. Most of these news-readers couldn't investigate their way out of a wet bag and are mostly left-wing mouthpieces.

=================
[i]But those MSM'S are weapons of the c*******t-democrats to report false crimes, create and fabricate crimes against the Republican party. There are nothing credible coming out from the mouths of those MSM reporters.

Only Foxnews is dependable and credible new outlet. he reporters and commentators are honest .

Reply
May 5, 2021 09:00:22   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
[quote=Radiance3]=================
[i]But those MSM'S are weapons of the c*******t-democrats to report false crimes, create and fabricate crimes against the Republican party. There are nothing credible coming out from the mouths of those MSM reporters.

Only Foxnews is dependable and credible new outlet. he reporters and commentators are honest .[/quote]

Faux Nouse is not a news outlet. They are only allowed to broadcast 1 hour of news per day.
Their license is not a News Broadcasting License, it is an
Entertainment License.
This is how they get away with the crap they pull to baffle their faithful, sweet gullible ewes.

Reply
 
 
May 5, 2021 09:08:29   #
Radiance3
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Faux Nouse is not a news outlet. They are only allowed to broadcast 1 hour of news per day.
Their license is not a News Broadcasting License, it is an
Entertainment License.
This is how they get away with the crap they pull to baffle their faithful, sweet gullible ewes.

==============
Nothing coming out of your mouth is credible. So get lost please.

Reply
May 5, 2021 09:25:40   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
dtucker300 wrote:
They can't count v**es and they can't count people accurately for the census and representative apportionment. The left controls the Democratic party and they lie, c***t, and steal because their ends justify their means.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/why-did-the-biden-census-bureau-add-2-5-million-more-residents-to-blue-state-population-count

Why did the Biden Census Bureau add 2.5 million more residents to blue state population count?
by Stephen Moore
May 03, 2021


There is something very fishy about the new 2020 Census Bureau data determining which states picked up seats and those that lost seats.

Most of the revisions to the original estimates have moved in one direction: population gains were added to blue states, and population losses were subtracted from red states. The December revisions in population estimates under the Biden Census Bureau added some 2.5 million blue state residents and subtracted more than 500,000 red state residents. These population estimates determine how many e*******l v**es each state receives for p**********l e******ns and the number of congressional seats in each state.

Is this a mere coincidence?

Remember, the House of Representatives is razor-thin today, with the Democrats sporting just a three-seat majority with five seats currently vacant. So a switch in three or four seats in 2022 e******ns could flip the House and take the gavel away from current Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats. A population shift of 3 million is the equivalent of four seats moving from R to D.

A conversation with Douglas Holtz-Eakin of the American Action Forum
The original projections for the census reapportionment had New York losing two seats, Rhode Island losing a seat, and Illinois perhaps losing two seats. Instead, New York and Illinois only lose one seat, and Rhode Island loses no seats. Meanwhile, Texas was expected to gain three seats, Florida two seats, and Arizona one seat. Instead, Texas gains only two seats, Florida only one, and Arizona none.

Was the Census Bureau count r****d? Was it manipulated by the Biden team to hand more seats to the Democrats and to get more money (federal spending is often allocated based on population) for the blue states?

The evidence is now only circumstantial, but when errors or revisions are almost all only in one direction, the alarm bells appropriately go off.

Here are some of the strange outcomes in the census revisions just released:

1) New York — We’ve been tracking the annual population/migration changes between states since the last census of 2010. According to census data over the past decade, New York lost about 1.3 million residents on net to other states. (This does not include immigration, births, and deaths.) Still, this is a population loss equivalent to two, maybe three, lost congressional seats. But the final numbers ADDED more than 860,000. That’s roughly twice the population of Buffalo and Rochester — combined. This is the state that has lost by far the largest population over the past decade.

2) Many deep blue states had 2020 census numbers significantly revised upward from their December estimates: Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

3) Many red states had 2020 census numbers significantly lower than their 2020 estimates: Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas.

4) Going back to the 2010 census, the final headcount in every state was within 0.4% of the original estimate, and 30 of them were within 0.2%. This time around, 19 states were more than 1% off, 7 were more than 2% off, NY was more than 3.8% off, and NJ was more than 4.5% off.

5) Virtually every one of the significant deviations from the estimates favored Democrats. Just five states in the 2020 census were within the same margin (0.41%) that all states were within from the 2010 census.

Maybe the 2010 estimates were a******lly accurate, or perhaps the 2020 estimates were unusually inaccurate. The Census Bureau needs to tell Congress why these revisions under Obama were so much more significant than usual and weighted in one direction: toward the blue Biden states.
They can't count v**es and they can't count people... (show quote)


The census was done under trump.

Reply
May 5, 2021 12:56:10   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Victor Davis Hanson's Private Papers

Optimism, Inc.: One Too Many Lies?
May 4, 2021 Victor Davis Hanson

Victor Davis Hanson // Private Papers

I think daily, incrementally, insidiously the number of Americans that does not believe official Ministry of T***h communiques grows larger. And the number promulgating them for careerist purposes shrinks.

The white-driven, Anti-Asian h**e-crime spree lie is about dead. The data showed the very opposite: w****s were under-represented as generic h**e-crime perpetrators and in particular were not responsible for the uptick of anti-Asian violence, either proportionally or in absolute numbers. African-Americans were overrepresented, both generically and especially in the case of Anti-Asian crimes.

The Capitol J****** 6 “armed i**********n” lie (as opposed to a spontaneous mob frenzy) is dissipating, despite the Biden whopper that it was more a threat than Pearl Harbor or 9/11 to democracy (5,000 were k**led on those two days). We are learning by leaks, bits and pieces of witnesses, and an occasional honest account that there were no armed i**********nary “leaders”; no protestor, however frenzied, k**led anyone. Indeed, the only violent death was an unarmed veteran shot and k**led by a — mysteriously unnamed–Capitol officer.

No Capitol officer was murdered by Trump crazies. No one was arrested with a firearm.

No one any longer believes the government-peddled great v******tion myth that s******c r****m harms the marginalized from becoming v******ted while recalcitrant white neanderthals endanger us all by conspiratorially refusing v******tion.

In t***h, there are plenty of v******tion spots everywhere now (one can walk into a pharmacy without an appointment and get a shot in minutes here in rural Fresno County). W****s have a higher percentage of being v******ted than Hispanics and b****s. And there are cultural and historical reasons, not current bias or r****m, for the reluctance of such groups.

The big lie is based on a measurement of those who were actually v******ted rather than the availability of v******tions to all, regardless of race. In California from the very beginning there were efforts to target minority/majority communities, and to add in groups other than adjudicated by age (which is an equal-opportunity co-morbidity of C****-**).

Moreover, the media theme that a bunch of white deplorable nuts are endangering us all by not getting v******ted, while historically oppressed minorities are not, by not getting v******ted simply is eroding. With the government on the one hand worried sick that millions of doses will go unused, and with media hysterias on the other that the drug stores are wasting thousands of v******tions that go unused, it is impossible to juggle the misinformation by simultaneously claiming that some minority groups are going unv******ted because greedy w****s grabbed all the doses and thus got v******ted at disproportionate rates.

So each day as the woke Minster of T***h narratives mount, so does the skepticism of a weary public to the propaganda.

We are becoming cynical 1980s Eastern Europeans who quietly scoffed at their daily government news. And this is step one to a repudiation of the lies we have been living with—that masks were necessary outdoors even for those fully v******ted; that derelict, sexual harasser Andrew Cuomo is a noted author, Emmy-winner and national icon rather than a reckless sexual-harasser and responsible for needless death and misery by his unhinged long-term facilities policies; that Oprah, LeBron, and the Obamas are genuine voices of what it is like to be oppressed in America, and all the subsidiary unt***hs: the “brave” former intelligence officials who signed campaign-sensitive affidavits seconding Joe Biden’s insistence that H****r’s laptop was a Russian disinformation trick; that Trump scoffed at “proof” that Russians put bounties on Americans in Afghanistan as they were appease; and that Joe Biden has no cognitive issues and never did, at least of the sort that prompted his predecessor to take cognitive tests and draw the attention of a Yale psychiatry professor to diagnose him as unhinged in absentia.

In sum, the woke movement daily, hourly, second-by-second hinges on unt***h, from the 1619 canard to America is systemically r****t. And the number who spot the lies is beginning to outnumber the number who lives by them—which means the Revolution is likely to follow the Jacobin rather than Bolshevik fate.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.