The Socialization of America, Biden's $6 Trillion Redistribution of Wealth (Page 6): I did answer yours pay attention. You just didn't like my answer, not my problem.

Cuda2020

Parky60 wrote:

Sorry, I asked my question first. You answer mine I'll answer yours.

I did answer yours pay attention. You just didn't like my answer, not my problem.

Cuda2020

Radiance3 wrote:

=============== br i You love Biden because he gi... (show quote)

Once again you talk about something you know nothing about, I'm seeing a pattern here.

Cuda2020

Radiance3 wrote:

================ br i Handouts mostly populate t... (show quote)

You are a very h**eful person, and by the way more blue states give out more then receive, look up the facts, red states are the true burden to US. You do know the old addage ...It is better to keep silent... a clue for you, you've already given it away. LOL

But hey you have a happy mothers day..."Radiance"

Radiance3

Cuda2020 wrote:

Once again you talk about something you know nothing about, I'm seeing a pattern here.

===============
You are not worth my time. Out from my space.

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

Cuda2020 wrote:

I did answer yours pay attention. You just didn't like my answer, not my problem.

As usual you lie. Sorry you didn't...in case you missed it I asked you to -- maybe I wasn't specific enough but we WERE discussing science at the time which I answered -- prove to me (scientifically) that life begins at birth (I proved it begins at conception) and why is it moral to k**l babies before -- and I might add AFTER now -- birth.

Of course you'll come up with some lame ass excuse not to answer.

Radiance3

Parky60 wrote:

As usual you lie. Sorry you didn't...in case you missed it I asked you to -- maybe I wasn't specific enough but we WERE discussing science at the time which I answered -- prove to me (scientifically) that life begins at birth (I proved it begins at conception) and why is it moral to k**l babies before -- and I might add AFTER now -- before birth.

Of course you'll come up with some lame ass excuse not to answer.

=================
Perfect Parky, thank you.

Cuda2020

Parky60 wrote:

As usual you lie. Sorry you didn't...in case you missed it I asked you to -- maybe I wasn't specific enough but we WERE discussing science at the time which I answered -- prove to me (scientifically) that life begins at birth (I proved it begins at conception) and why is it moral to k**l babies before -- and I might add AFTER now -- birth.

Of course you'll come up with some lame ass excuse not to answer.

You're really not getting this are you...Life Begins at FERTILIZATION...NOT Conception. There is your answer, got it! If an egg is NOT fertilized nothing happens. The Pill I was referring to PREVENTS fertilization. Go bang your drum somewhere else.
The choice is still the woman's, God put it in her hands, not yours, not the government's.
And an embryo is NOT a baby, not yet, that's a simple fact.
I am for prevention all the way. PP helps make that happen for millions of women.

Also the ruling of the courts is...Life of begins at birth along with their rights of the individual.
You and your cohorts lie everyday of the week always wanting to fit everything into your own little Biblical world view, which is quite hypocritical and twisted, time for a new book.

Big Kahuna

Cuda2020 wrote:

You're really not getting this are you...Life Begi... (show quote)

PP helps make our short lives even shorter. Infanticide is murder. End of discussion.

Cuda2020

drlarrygino wrote:

PP helps make our short lives even shorter. Infanticide is murder. End of discussion.

PP prevents unwanted births, ergo also a******ns, it is pure logic to support their efforts. End of discussion.

Your logic is living a lie, NO woman wants to abort a child after nurturing it for almost 10 months, to think otherwise is pure insanity, it is only when the mothers life is in danger. all the way around that is a tragedy, no escaping that, but also no reason to enhance the tragedy by placing guilt or shame on the woman with the excruciating decision.

Big Kahuna

Cuda2020 wrote:

PP prevents unwanted births, ergo also a******ns, it is pure logic to support their efforts. End of discussion.

Your logic is living a lie, NO woman wants to abort a child after nurturing it for almost 10 months, to think otherwise is pure insanity, it is only when the mothers life is in danger. all the way around that is a tragedy, no escaping that, but also no reason to enhance the tragedy by placing guilt or shame on the woman with the excruciating decision.

A lot of women would prefer to abort their child at 9 months than have to try and support the child for 17 years. In fact, having an a******n for economic reasons and selfish reasons is one of the most common reasons for an a******n. End of discussion.

Radiance3

Parky60 wrote:

Geez your dumb.

Definition of conception: the process of becoming pregnant involving fertilization.

Thank you for proving my point dumdum.

=============
Kudos, perfect answer Parky. Cuda wants to invent and replace biology and chemistry, similar to Woke, the CRT, and Project 1619, now in demand and used by the LEFT.

federally indicted mattoid

I thought we were having a discourse on redistribution of wealth slash socialism.

Oh well, can we do immigration now?

Lol

The right are not in their right minds, so to speak. They are still the dittoheads from the Rush days.

Cuda2020

drlarrygino wrote:

A lot of women would prefer to abort their child at 9 months than have to try and support the child for 17 years. In fact, having an a******n for economic reasons and selfish reasons is one of the most common reasons for an a******n. End of discussion.

That's a completely clueless and insane comment. They don't nurture it for 9 months to then terminate, you have no logical reasoning, and are therefore incapable of realizing what they sacrifice to do so, that doesn't surprise me. Your beliefs are h**eful ones that only supports your narrative to make women out to be villain's. You buy the rhetoric hook line and sinker, you don't think.

Radiance3

useful mattoid 45 wrote:

I thought we were having a discourse on redistribution of wealth slash socialism.

Oh well, can we do immigration now?

Lol

The right are not in their right minds, so to speak. They are still the dittoheads from the Rush days.

================
Well, ask Cuda about the fertilization and unwanted birth. That talks volume. Biological about creation of human by God. You now have the new version of when baby begin inside woman's womb. Now, you have the CRT, WOKE, and the f**e history on project 1619. Everything re-invented to fit their narratives. It's like these:

By Charles Dickens:
“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of light, it was the season of darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair.”

The best of times belong to president Trump. The worst of times and darkness belong to president demented Biden.

More questions?

Cuda2020

Parky60 wrote:

Geez your dumb.

Definition of conception: the process of becoming pregnant involving fertilization.

Thank you for proving my point dumdum.

Einstein what's your point, you have none, I keep talking about preventing fertilization and you keep telling me life begins at conception, what a Bozo. Besides I'm going by the low mental bar on the right who equate conception with intercourse, I'm assuming your big fix is for people to abstain, perfect, now how about coming into the 21st century, many people have intercourse without conception and I'm not talking about birth control.