One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
'A Unique Problem': US Bishops May Demand Biden and Other Pro-A******ns Politicians Stop Taking Communion
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
May 7, 2021 09:44:24   #
Cuda2020
 
Parky60 wrote:
Why didn't the woman "make" the choice then to NOT spread her legs?


Why didn't the man refrain from dipping his stick into the honey jar?

Not to mention...It is estimated that 734,630 people were raped (including threatened, attempted, or completed rape) in the U.S. in 2018. Numbers may have changed somewhat since then.

Reply
May 7, 2021 11:15:43   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Cuda2020 wrote:
Murder of a human being not terminating an amoeba, hence no murder. Again a pill that prevents fertilization is a good thing.

I never said anything about a pill that prevents fertilization. I've presented an argument that life begins at conception and all you can up with is a weak as hell reply (which you always do). Prove to me when life begins and why it's moral to k**l a k**l a human fetus.

Reply
May 8, 2021 07:38:33   #
Cuda2020
 
Parky60 wrote:
I never said anything about a pill that prevents fertilization. I've presented an argument that life begins at conception and all you can up with is a weak as hell reply (which you always do). Prove to me when life begins and why it's moral to k**l a k**l a human fetus.


I see, so you don't read or acknowledge what others post, that figures. Morality is with the individual, I realize that is a concept you simply don't comprehend or we wouldn't be having this argument. I'll say it again the courts have defined human life beginning at birth. When the individual is separate from the mother. If you continue to insult I'll do the same, but will probably simply end the discussion. You want to bring unwanted children into the world you need to change the consciousness of minds of woman to make other choices or redefine when a human being is a human being.

Reply
 
 
May 8, 2021 09:10:29   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
Cuda2020 wrote:
...Morality is with the individual...

Morality is an ABSOLUTE dumdum.

Of course you deflected my question...Prove to me when life begins and why it's moral to k**l a k**l a human fetus.

You rely on the government too much. But I would expect as much, you're a l*****t.

Reply
May 8, 2021 09:27:26   #
kemmer
 
Parky60 wrote:
Morality is an ABSOLUTE dumdum.

Morality varies with different belief systems, nutter.

Reply
May 8, 2021 10:04:21   #
Gman65
 
Cuda2020 wrote:
I see, so you don't read or acknowledge what others post, that figures. Morality is with the individual, I realize that is a concept you simply don't comprehend or we wouldn't be having this argument. I'll say it again the courts have defined human life beginning at birth. When the individual is separate from the mother. If you continue to insult I'll do the same, but will probably simply end the discussion. You want to bring unwanted children into the world you need to change the consciousness of minds of woman to make other choices or redefine when a human being is a human being.
I see, so you don't read or acknowledge what other... (show quote)

If the courts ruled life begins at birth , then will you tell me why a person such as a murderer or drunk driver is charged with 2 death's if the victim is a woman with child.

Reply
May 8, 2021 12:35:18   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
kemmer wrote:
Morality varies with different belief systems, nutter.

You can believe wh**ever stupid belief system you want to but morality is ABSOLUTE!

Reply
 
 
May 8, 2021 13:29:03   #
kemmer
 
Parky60 wrote:
You can believe wh**ever stupid belief system you want to but morality is ABSOLUTE!

Hahah... YOUR morality may be absolute, but that’s YOUR problem.

Reply
May 8, 2021 14:23:32   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
kemmer wrote:
Hahah... YOUR morality may be absolute, but that’s YOUR problem.


It'll be YOUR problem someday unless you repent.

Reply
May 8, 2021 14:24:43   #
Gman65
 
Cuda2020 wrote:
I see, so you don't read or acknowledge what others post, that figures. Morality is with the individual, I realize that is a concept you simply don't comprehend or we wouldn't be having this argument. I'll say it again the courts have defined human life beginning at birth. When the individual is separate from the mother. If you continue to insult I'll do the same, but will probably simply end the discussion. You want to bring unwanted children into the world you need to change the consciousness of minds of woman to make other choices or redefine when a human being is a human being.
I see, so you don't read or acknowledge what other... (show quote)

Still waiting for an answer for the response to the above post from you in reference to my question about , If a murderer or drink driver k**ls a mother carrying a a unborn child , why is it that often times they are charged with 2 count's of murder if you say the courts ruled life doesn't begin until birth ?

Reply
May 8, 2021 16:20:17   #
Cuda2020
 
Parky60 wrote:
Morality is an ABSOLUTE dumdum.

Of course you deflected my question...Prove to me when life begins and why it's moral to k**l a k**l a human fetus.

You rely on the government too much. But I would expect as much, you're a l*****t.


You're backwards, it's the Right Cons who looks to government to roll over the rights of people, the left tries to enforce our constitutional rights. I don't have to prove $h*+ to you. Where did I ever say it was moral, try and follow me here, it's up to the woman growing a future human being. Not mine, not yours, and most absolutely... NOT the government's! Dig Dig Dig You Prove to me you give a damn about that homeless, motherless child after it's born. You'll be whining that its sucking off the system.

Reply
 
 
May 8, 2021 16:27:00   #
Cuda2020
 
Gman65 wrote:
If the courts ruled life begins at birth , then will you tell me why a person such as a murderer or drunk driver is charged with 2 death's if the victim is a woman with child.


Probably because it was in the process of developing into a baby, that was the choice of the mother and when someone else caused it's death and terminated the continued growth, the drunk driver took that "decided" choice to have a baby away from the mother who had decided to grow a human being and therefore did k**l her future child.

Reply
May 8, 2021 16:31:24   #
Gman65
 
Cuda2020 wrote:
You're backwards, it's the Right Cons who looks to government to roll over the rights of people, the left tries to enforce our constitutional rights. I don't have to prove $h*+ to you. Where did I ever say it was moral, try and follow me here, it's up to the woman growing a future human being. Not mine, not yours, and most absolutely... NOT the government's! Dig Dig Dig You Prove to me you give a damn about that homeless, motherless child after it's born. You'll be whining that its sucking off the system.
You're backwards, it's the Right Cons who looks to... (show quote)


LEFTS TRY TO ENFORCE OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ,??? YAAAAA , RIGHT. IT'S OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT THAT IS BEING TAKEN AWAY , AND ERODED AS WE SPEAK BY YOUR LEFTIES, THAT YOU CLAIM ARE PROTECTING OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS . THAT IS FLAT OUT INCORRECT. THIS IS JUST ONE EXAMPLE .

Reply
May 8, 2021 16:34:11   #
Gman65
 
Cuda2020 wrote:
Probably because it was in the process of developing into a baby, that was the choice of the mother and when someone else caused it's death and terminated the continued growth, the drunk driver took that "decided" choice to have a baby away from the mother who had decided to grow a human being and therefore did k**l her future child.


But how could that even be possible when you clearly stated the courts ruled life does not begin until the baby is born ? That makes absolutely no sense to what you said the courts ruled for ?

Reply
May 8, 2021 17:00:42   #
Cuda2020
 
Gman65 wrote:
LEFTS TRY TO ENFORCE OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ,??? YAAAAA , RIGHT. IT'S OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT THAT IS BEING TAKEN AWAY , AND ERODED AS WE SPEAK BY YOUR LEFTIES, THAT YOU CLAIM ARE PROTECTING OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS . THAT IS FLAT OUT INCORRECT. THIS IS JUST ONE EXAMPLE .


Is that a fact! Show me...WHERE has it been taken away? NOWHERE. You're just parroting your handlers propaganda.

Btw, everything in all caps is considered yelling and against the rules of the forum.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.