Citing grave threat, Scientific American replaces 'c*****e c****e' with 'climate emergency'
(Most on the Right are anti-science, be it the p******c, c*****e c****e, v*****es, or wh**ever. They would rather cling to their superstitions than to facts. They are ushering in a new Dark Age.)
Scientific American magazine announced Monday that it would stop using the term "c*****e c****e" in articles about man-made g****l w*****g and substitute "climate emergency" instead.
"Journalism should reflect what science says: the climate emergency is here," Scientific American senior editor Mark Fischetti said in a Monday post about the magazine's decision.
To make his point, Fischetti pointed to the mounting number of weather-related disasters that most scientists agree stem from c*****e c****e.
"A hurricane blasts Florida. A California dam bursts because floods have piled water high up behind it. A sudden, record-setting cold snap cuts power to the entire state of Texas," Fischetti wrote. "These are also emergencies that require immediate action. Multiply these situations worldwide, and you have the biggest environmental emergency to beset the earth in millennia: c*****e c****e."
The oldest continuously published magazine in the U.S., Scientific American is not alone it its decision to highlight what it sees as an emergency requiring immediate action. It joined the Columbia Journalism Review, the Nation, the Guardian, Noticias Telemundo, Al Jazeera, Japan's Asahi Shimbun and Italy's La Repubblica in releasing a statement about the change in language.
"The planet is heating up way too fast. It’s time for journalism to recognize that the climate emergency is here," the statement said, adding, "Why 'emergency'? Because words matter. To preserve a livable planet, humanity must take action immediately."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/citing-grave-threat-scientific-american-replacing-c*****e-c****e-with-climate-emergency-181629578.html
rumitoid wrote:
(Most on the Right are anti-science, be it the p******c, c*****e c****e, v*****es, or wh**ever. They would rather cling to their superstitions than to facts. They are ushering in a new Dark Age.)
Scientific American magazine announced Monday that it would stop using the term "c*****e c****e" in articles about man-made g****l w*****g and substitute "climate emergency" instead.
"Journalism should reflect what science says: the climate emergency is here," Scientific American senior editor Mark Fischetti said in a Monday post about the magazine's decision.
To make his point, Fischetti pointed to the mounting number of weather-related disasters that most scientists agree stem from c*****e c****e.
"A hurricane blasts Florida. A California dam bursts because floods have piled water high up behind it. A sudden, record-setting cold snap cuts power to the entire state of Texas," Fischetti wrote. "These are also emergencies that require immediate action. Multiply these situations worldwide, and you have the biggest environmental emergency to beset the earth in millennia: c*****e c****e."
The oldest continuously published magazine in the U.S., Scientific American is not alone it its decision to highlight what it sees as an emergency requiring immediate action. It joined the Columbia Journalism Review, the Nation, the Guardian, Noticias Telemundo, Al Jazeera, Japan's Asahi Shimbun and Italy's La Repubblica in releasing a statement about the change in language.
"The planet is heating up way too fast. It’s time for journalism to recognize that the climate emergency is here," the statement said, adding, "Why 'emergency'? Because words matter. To preserve a livable planet, humanity must take action immediately."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/citing-grave-threat-scientific-american-replacing-c*****e-c****e-with-climate-emergency-181629578.html(Most on the Right are anti-science, be it the p**... (
show quote)
Hurricanes have been slamming into Fla for much longer than people have been around. Dams don’t fail because there’s water behind them, faulty design and poor materials would be the problem there, and every ‘Flat Earther’ I’ve ever met were all dementiacrats.
How’s that fit your narrative ?
rumitoid wrote:
(Most on the Right are anti-science, be it the p******c, c*****e c****e, v*****es, or wh**ever. They would rather cling to their superstitions than to facts. They are ushering in a new Dark Age.)
Scientific American magazine announced Monday that it would stop using the term "c*****e c****e" in articles about man-made g****l w*****g and substitute "climate emergency" instead.
"Journalism should reflect what science says: the climate emergency is here," Scientific American senior editor Mark Fischetti said in a Monday post about the magazine's decision.
To make his point, Fischetti pointed to the mounting number of weather-related disasters that most scientists agree stem from c*****e c****e.
"A hurricane blasts Florida. A California dam bursts because floods have piled water high up behind it. A sudden, record-setting cold snap cuts power to the entire state of Texas," Fischetti wrote. "These are also emergencies that require immediate action. Multiply these situations worldwide, and you have the biggest environmental emergency to beset the earth in millennia: c*****e c****e."
The oldest continuously published magazine in the U.S., Scientific American is not alone it its decision to highlight what it sees as an emergency requiring immediate action. It joined the Columbia Journalism Review, the Nation, the Guardian, Noticias Telemundo, Al Jazeera, Japan's Asahi Shimbun and Italy's La Repubblica in releasing a statement about the change in language.
"The planet is heating up way too fast. It’s time for journalism to recognize that the climate emergency is here," the statement said, adding, "Why 'emergency'? Because words matter. To preserve a livable planet, humanity must take action immediately."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/citing-grave-threat-scientific-american-replacing-c*****e-c****e-with-climate-emergency-181629578.html(Most on the Right are anti-science, be it the p**... (
show quote)
More fear mongering from the left to justify their extreme agenda and obtain more control. The "science" is what they manipulate it to be and people like you are perfectly willing to be duped. It is people like you who are willing to sell their soul and freedoms to the State that make tyrants possible.
rumitoid wrote:
(Most on the Right are anti-science, be it the p******c, c*****e c****e, v*****es, or wh**ever. They would rather cling to their superstitions than to facts. They are ushering in a new Dark Age.)
Scientific American magazine announced Monday that it would stop using the term "c*****e c****e" in articles about man-made g****l w*****g and substitute "climate emergency" instead.
"Journalism should reflect what science says: the climate emergency is here," Scientific American senior editor Mark Fischetti said in a Monday post about the magazine's decision.
To make his point, Fischetti pointed to the mounting number of weather-related disasters that most scientists agree stem from c*****e c****e.
"A hurricane blasts Florida. A California dam bursts because floods have piled water high up behind it. A sudden, record-setting cold snap cuts power to the entire state of Texas," Fischetti wrote. "These are also emergencies that require immediate action. Multiply these situations worldwide, and you have the biggest environmental emergency to beset the earth in millennia: c*****e c****e."
The oldest continuously published magazine in the U.S., Scientific American is not alone it its decision to highlight what it sees as an emergency requiring immediate action. It joined the Columbia Journalism Review, the Nation, the Guardian, Noticias Telemundo, Al Jazeera, Japan's Asahi Shimbun and Italy's La Repubblica in releasing a statement about the change in language.
"The planet is heating up way too fast. It’s time for journalism to recognize that the climate emergency is here," the statement said, adding, "Why 'emergency'? Because words matter. To preserve a livable planet, humanity must take action immediately."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/citing-grave-threat-scientific-american-replacing-c*****e-c****e-with-climate-emergency-181629578.html(Most on the Right are anti-science, be it the p**... (
show quote)
Rumitoid you are proof that the h**e comes from the left as well. You simply can’t post without it.
rumitoid wrote:
(Most on the Right are anti-science, be it the p******c, c*****e c****e, v*****es, or wh**ever. They would rather cling to their superstitions than to facts. They are ushering in a new Dark Age.)
Scientific American magazine announced Monday that it would stop using the term "c*****e c****e" in articles about man-made g****l w*****g and substitute "climate emergency" instead.
"Journalism should reflect what science says: the climate emergency is here," Scientific American senior editor Mark Fischetti said in a Monday post about the magazine's decision.
To make his point, Fischetti pointed to the mounting number of weather-related disasters that most scientists agree stem from c*****e c****e.
"A hurricane blasts Florida. A California dam bursts because floods have piled water high up behind it. A sudden, record-setting cold snap cuts power to the entire state of Texas," Fischetti wrote. "These are also emergencies that require immediate action. Multiply these situations worldwide, and you have the biggest environmental emergency to beset the earth in millennia: c*****e c****e."
The oldest continuously published magazine in the U.S., Scientific American is not alone it its decision to highlight what it sees as an emergency requiring immediate action. It joined the Columbia Journalism Review, the Nation, the Guardian, Noticias Telemundo, Al Jazeera, Japan's Asahi Shimbun and Italy's La Repubblica in releasing a statement about the change in language.
"The planet is heating up way too fast. It’s time for journalism to recognize that the climate emergency is here," the statement said, adding, "Why 'emergency'? Because words matter. To preserve a livable planet, humanity must take action immediately."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/citing-grave-threat-scientific-american-replacing-c*****e-c****e-with-climate-emergency-181629578.html(Most on the Right are anti-science, be it the p**... (
show quote)
We're not anti science. ..... we're anti stupid........... so keep changing what you call it when it fails to produce enough i***ts to follow........ like some i know.
rumitoid wrote:
(Most on the Right are anti-science, be it the p******c, c*****e c****e, v*****es, or wh**ever. They would rather cling to their superstitions than to facts. They are ushering in a new Dark Age.)
Scientific American magazine announced Monday that it would stop using the term "c*****e c****e" in articles about man-made g****l w*****g and substitute "climate emergency" instead.
"Journalism should reflect what science says: the climate emergency is here," Scientific American senior editor Mark Fischetti said in a Monday post about the magazine's decision.
To make his point, Fischetti pointed to the mounting number of weather-related disasters that most scientists agree stem from c*****e c****e.
"A hurricane blasts Florida. A California dam bursts because floods have piled water high up behind it. A sudden, record-setting cold snap cuts power to the entire state of Texas," Fischetti wrote. "These are also emergencies that require immediate action. Multiply these situations worldwide, and you have the biggest environmental emergency to beset the earth in millennia: c*****e c****e."
The oldest continuously published magazine in the U.S., Scientific American is not alone it its decision to highlight what it sees as an emergency requiring immediate action. It joined the Columbia Journalism Review, the Nation, the Guardian, Noticias Telemundo, Al Jazeera, Japan's Asahi Shimbun and Italy's La Repubblica in releasing a statement about the change in language.
"The planet is heating up way too fast. It’s time for journalism to recognize that the climate emergency is here," the statement said, adding, "Why 'emergency'? Because words matter. To preserve a livable planet, humanity must take action immediately."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/citing-grave-threat-scientific-american-replacing-c*****e-c****e-with-climate-emergency-181629578.html(Most on the Right are anti-science, be it the p**... (
show quote)
Anything to accelerate fear and rake in millions~~ it sells after all...
Our planet will continue to do what it does best and what it does is continue its evolutionary cycles of warming and cooling..
Our responsibility to keep air, water and land clean....
The “ emergencies” you define are attributable to lack of maintenance. Both on the dam and Texas’ electrical grid and power plants.. Hurricanes are a natural
Phenomenon that have taken place all through the cycles of when and why they develop..The el Nina and el Nino play a more important factor to the cycles of our w*****r p*****ns and finally “ c*****e c****e “ is in fact true... Seasons alone show us them...The changing of the words used, this one, to usher back in the professed doom and gloom of our beautiful planet is just that... How many times have they changed c*****e c****e to something else?? Lets see~~ g****l w*****g to global heating ( sounds more urgent) climate crisis well the climate is always changing," so what's the big deal?
Double entendres that turn polluting liabilities into profitable assets... Using measures to emphasis emotion and attention to optimize advertising and profits," as if that isn’t obvious.. So, what’ll it be: "c*****e c****e," "g****l w*****g," "climate crisis," "climate breakdown," "global heating," "environmental destruction" or something else entirely? Words matter, the worse the description the more concern or fear it should exhibit.. Like sharing I love you vs I h**e you, see how that emotion thing kicks in???
rumitoid wrote:
(Most on the Right are anti-science, be it the p******c, c*****e c****e, v*****es, or wh**ever. They would rather cling to their superstitions than to facts. They are ushering in a new Dark Age.)
Scientific American magazine announced Monday that it would stop using the term "c*****e c****e" in articles about man-made g****l w*****g and substitute "climate emergency" instead.
"Journalism should reflect what science says: the climate emergency is here," Scientific American senior editor Mark Fischetti said in a Monday post about the magazine's decision.
To make his point, Fischetti pointed to the mounting number of weather-related disasters that most scientists agree stem from c*****e c****e.
"A hurricane blasts Florida. A California dam bursts because floods have piled water high up behind it. A sudden, record-setting cold snap cuts power to the entire state of Texas," Fischetti wrote. "These are also emergencies that require immediate action. Multiply these situations worldwide, and you have the biggest environmental emergency to beset the earth in millennia: c*****e c****e."
The oldest continuously published magazine in the U.S., Scientific American is not alone it its decision to highlight what it sees as an emergency requiring immediate action. It joined the Columbia Journalism Review, the Nation, the Guardian, Noticias Telemundo, Al Jazeera, Japan's Asahi Shimbun and Italy's La Repubblica in releasing a statement about the change in language.
"The planet is heating up way too fast. It’s time for journalism to recognize that the climate emergency is here," the statement said, adding, "Why 'emergency'? Because words matter. To preserve a livable planet, humanity must take action immediately."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/citing-grave-threat-scientific-american-replacing-c*****e-c****e-with-climate-emergency-181629578.html(Most on the Right are anti-science, be it the p**... (
show quote)
These i***ts are complacent with sh!ting in their own nest for one of two reasons. Either they are not long for the world and don’t want to be inconvenienced in any way or they think they are days or weeks from being raptured to the heavens.
lindajoy wrote:
Anything to accelerate fear and rake in millions~~ it sells after all...
Our planet will continue to do what it does best and what it does is continue its evolutionary cycles of warming and cooling..
Our responsibility to keep air, water and land clean....
The “ emergencies” you define are attributable to lack of maintenance. Both on the dam and Texas’ electrical grid and power plants.. Hurricanes are a natural
Phenomenon that have taken place all through the cycles of when and why they develop..The el Nina and el Nino play a more important factor to the cycles of our w*****r p*****ns and finally “ c*****e c****e “ is in fact true... Seasons alone show us them...The changing of the words used, this one, to usher back in the professed doom and gloom of our beautiful planet is just that... How many times have they changed c*****e c****e to something else?? Lets see~~ g****l w*****g to global heating ( sounds more urgent) climate crisis well the climate is always changing," so what's the big deal?
Double entendres that turn polluting liabilities into profitable assets... Using measures to emphasis emotion and attention to optimize advertising and profits," as if that isn’t obvious.. So, what’ll it be: "c*****e c****e," "g****l w*****g," "climate crisis," "climate breakdown," "global heating," "environmental destruction" or something else entirely? Words matter, the worse the description the more concern or fear it should exhibit.. Like sharing I love you vs I h**e you, see how that emotion thing kicks in???
Anything to accelerate fear and rake in millions~~... (
show quote)
Trying to think up all these different names for the
weather must be tiring. 🙄
rumitoid wrote:
(Most on the Right are anti-science, be it the p******c, c*****e c****e, v*****es, or wh**ever. They would rather cling to their superstitions than to facts. They are ushering in a new Dark Age.)
Scientific American magazine announced Monday that it would stop using the term "c*****e c****e" in articles about man-made g****l w*****g and substitute "climate emergency" instead.
"Journalism should reflect what science says: the climate emergency is here," Scientific American senior editor Mark Fischetti said in a Monday post about the magazine's decision.
To make his point, Fischetti pointed to the mounting number of weather-related disasters that most scientists agree stem from c*****e c****e.
"A hurricane blasts Florida. A California dam bursts because floods have piled water high up behind it. A sudden, record-setting cold snap cuts power to the entire state of Texas," Fischetti wrote. "These are also emergencies that require immediate action. Multiply these situations worldwide, and you have the biggest environmental emergency to beset the earth in millennia: c*****e c****e."
The oldest continuously published magazine in the U.S., Scientific American is not alone it its decision to highlight what it sees as an emergency requiring immediate action. It joined the Columbia Journalism Review, the Nation, the Guardian, Noticias Telemundo, Al Jazeera, Japan's Asahi Shimbun and Italy's La Repubblica in releasing a statement about the change in language.
"The planet is heating up way too fast. It’s time for journalism to recognize that the climate emergency is here," the statement said, adding, "Why 'emergency'? Because words matter. To preserve a livable planet, humanity must take action immediately."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/citing-grave-threat-scientific-american-replacing-c*****e-c****e-with-climate-emergency-181629578.html(Most on the Right are anti-science, be it the p**... (
show quote)
It's a fact that the e******n was r****d. But someone is ignoring all the evidence,. As for changing the terminology , you name several publications that also just "Decided" to change the name. This is proof the NWO has complete control of the MSM. Weather or not c*****e c****e is a world wide concern you can bet it will be used by the NWO for all they can get out of it. Fear mongering and control .That's their M.O.
IF they were really concerned with the climate they would stop burning the rain forests and make the U.N. ban ALL nuclear weapons world wide Also you would think they would stop all these weather manipulation experiments most advanced countries are conducting. Superheating the ionosphere on a regular basis is probably causing more g****l w*****g then automobiles. Not to mention the hurricanes and other weird weather we are seeing lately.
Kevyn wrote:
These i***ts are complacent with sh!ting in their own nest for one of two reasons. Either they are not long for the world and don’t want to be inconvenienced in any way or they think they are days or weeks from being raptured to the heavens.
Go to our southern border and see all the i*****l a***ns biden invited to come over and then tell me about who's s**tting the nest.
Kevyn wrote:
These i***ts are complacent with sh!ting in their own nest for one of two reasons. Either they are not long for the world and don’t want to be inconvenienced in any way or they think they are days or weeks from being raptured to the heavens.
Well, at least you’ll know what happened to all the Christians when they suddenly disappear.......whether it’s days or weeks or years! 😉
EmilyD wrote:
Trying to think up all these different names for the weather must be tiring. 🙄
For them, yes... For us, we know what it is...Ahhh, to be so confused over something so naturally occurring..🤦🏻♀️
Kevyn wrote:
These i***ts are complacent with sh!ting in their own nest for one of two reasons. Either they are not long for the world and don’t want to be inconvenienced in any way or they think they are days or weeks from being raptured to the heavens.
Or just maybe we see the foolishness in your actions. .... rapture or not long for this world matters not.
Either way.....the dumbass and ignorance is visible to everyone but tye dumbasses and ignorant.
Youve picked your side....... duly noted as to where you chose
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
