lindajoy wrote:
How do we know, the legal avenues failed to do their constitutional duty in shutting down vs addressing and putting to rest one way or the other what evidence was available but never seen??No, Lon, it was determined it was skirted away...
BTW I loveeee cottage cheese and fruit!!!
"legal avenues failed to do their constitutional duty"? "evidence was available but never seen"? I don't think so. To wit:
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20420186/order-granting-motion-to-dismiss-statement-of-contest-1.pdf"Having reviewed the full evidentiary record ..."
"... and having considered, without limitation, all evidence submitted ..."
"I. The E******n Results
"...Biden prevailed ... in the State of Nevada by 33,596 v**es."
"II. The Agilis Machine
"... [Clark County] acquired an Agilis B****t Sorting System (the 'Agilis machine') from Runbeck..."
"III. Electronic V****g Machines
"...A. In-Person V****g Technology
"... confirm the v**er's identity...
"37. The v****g machines are also audited against a paper trail that is generated...
"38. After each e******n, [the counties compare] the paper trail created by the printer against the results..."
"40. ... there were no discrepancies ..."
"IV. Previous Lawsuits
"A. Kraus v. Cegavske
"... use of the Agilis machine is permissible under Nevada law ...
"43. During a ten-hour evidentiary hearing ...
"...[n]o evidence was presented that the setting used by Clark County causes or has resulted in any fraudulent b****t being validated or any valid b****t invalidated.
"45. '[t]here is no evidence that any v**e that should lawfully not be counted has been or will be counted,' and ...'[t]here is no evidence that any e******n worker did anything outside of the law, policy, or procedures.'
"48. ...'[p]etitioners [] failed to prove' that Mr. Gloria 'has interfered with any right they or anyone else has as an observer' ...
"50. The Kraus petitioners subsequently dismissed the appeal..." (The people contesting the e******n dismissed their own appeal.)
"53. ... after conducting a hearing and concluding that use of the Agilis machine does not 'conflict [law]...and ... there was 'little to no evidence that the machine is not doing what it's supposed to do ... The Stokke plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their case. (This is another group of people contesting the e******n dismissing their own case.)
And so on.
Again, that link is:
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20420186/order-granting-motion-to-dismiss-statement-of-contest-1.pdf