RandyBrian Loc: Texas

This is an excellent history of the origins of the c***d19 p******c, and the protecting of China and the scientific community by the MSM and the deep state. For those who dismiss the message because you don't like the messenger, this is from Tucker Carlson of Fox News. No conclusions are made, but there are still a lot of questions. Like man-made g****l w*****g and the s****n e******n theories, the stance of the left is that 'this is a settled issue so no more discussion is required.'
No. There are still a lot of questions with few satisfying answers. I believe in seeking and facing the t***h, even if it is unpleasant. The political model used by WHO, the UN, and now the current Washington administration and, in my opinion, the courts, is to look at all the possible results of an investigation, and then manipulate, hide information, and lie to get the result most beneficial to the manipulators. In other words, the end justifies the means.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-why-the-media-scientific-community-and-who-wont-investigate-c***d-origins

peg w

I like to get my news from a source that is fact cheaked, and Tucker is not an accurate source. See FactCheak.org. They are a non partisan group.
Were the C***d19 v***s came from is still an open question. It is most likely to have come from a mutation in bats that was natural. Remember the British varrent has 2 base pair mutation. The bat C***d has the same number. Mutations in RNA v***s are common. Why should China make a v***s that made their ecomony shut down for three mounths?
Trump lied aprox 30, 000 times during his presidency. Why do you think he told the t***h about his big loss? His ego couldn't stand the fact v**ers turned against him.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

You clearly did not bother to read the article, which is no big surprise. The bat theory is discussed, but the article is addressing the actions that WHO and others took to protect China and others.....it is not about the v***s, but about the lack of proper scientific investigations into it's origin. Read the article. i promise it will not compromise your l*****t thinking, but might help you realize that there are still questions that have been deliberately obfuscated.
As to your opinions about Tucker Carlson, Factcheck.org, and President Trump's supposed lies.....duly noted.

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

" See FactCheak.org" No such organization Peg - just like the quality of your fact checker!

kemmer

The same Tucker Carlson who pushed the lie about a s****n e******n for months? The Same Tucker Carlson who is largely responsible for Fox's $1.6 billion lawsuit by D******n?

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Peg, I corrected your spelling. Your fact checker is called "Fact Check.org". Here is what Wikipedia says about them:

"FactCheck.org is a nonprofit website that describes itself as a "consumer advocate for v**ers that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics". It is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania, and is funded primarily by the Annenberg Foundation." Wikipedia

And here is the relevant information on the Annenberg Foundation:

The Annenberg Foundation was originally founded by Walter J. Annenberg, a conservative who supported Ronald Reagan. However, when Walter Annenberg died, his family took over the management of the foundation and it took a turn to the far left and has ties to radical left individuals such as Bill Ayers and his friend and fellow left wing radical collegue Barack Obama. How is factcheck.org associated with these people:

To start, Ayers was the key founder of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was a Chicago public school reform project from 1995 to 2001. Upon its start in 1995, Obama was appointed Board Chairman and President of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Geesh, that alone connects all three. Well, it branches out even more from there.

Ayers co-chaired the organization’s Collaborative, which set the education policies of the Challenge. Oddly enough, Obama was the one who was authorized to delegate to the Collaborative in regards to its programs and projects. In addition to that, Obama often times had to seek advice and assistance from the Ayer’s led Collaborative in regards to the programmatic aspects of grant proposals. Ayers even sat on the same board as Obama as an “ex officio member”. They both also sat together on the board of the CAC’s Governance Committee. Obama and Ayers were two parts of a group of four who were instructed to draft the bylaws that would govern the CAC. Keep in mind that the “A” in CAC is for Annenberg, the owners of FactCheck.org. The funding for Ayer’s projects and those of his cronies was approved by Board Chair, Barack Obama.

Still think this is a non-partisan organization?

http://theswash.com/liberty/who-fact-checks-factcheck-org

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

So don't read it. Like I said, some people ignore facts because they dislike the messenger. You privilege.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

Fantastic research ACP! Thanks for posting it.

kemmer

Under Trump we had 4 years of the administration ignoring facts.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

Uh huh.

kemmer

Why should I bother with a dumb article you introduced with the statement of how the “Deep State” (!) and the MSM were protecting China and the scientific community? There’s no deep state, just people s**k of Trump and glad he’s gone.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

You absolutely should NOT bother to read it. It would just confuse you.

Sicilianthing

>>>

Here maybe this will help you guys see it for what it really is...
this is from March of last year - HINT !
https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-177872-1.html

maryla

The t***h always does that!

Abel

Pipe Dream on, kemmer. You shouldn't bother reading. Keep your head up uras & locked and don't bother with reading anything, it might cause you to work up to a brain fart. Education takes effort, and you appear to be in somewhat short supply of effort, so don't over work yourself.